From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Syed Mohammed Khasim <khasim@ti.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:07:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810140107.14647.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081014075950.GA22855@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Tuesday 14 October 2008, Russell King wrote:
> Since the OMAP updates I merged from Tony are already broken due to
> missing definitions, and I'm not getting any response from Tony on
> fixing those,
Probably has to do with his travel plans, which he mentioned
last week (Thursday?). I think he's back online in the next
day or two.
> I will be dropping the problematical updates so we can
> at least keep mainline OMAP in a buildable state. That seems to mean
> dropping the new OMAP3 support.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-14 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-14 2:27 linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-14 7:59 ` Russell King
2008-10-14 8:07 ` David Brownell [this message]
2008-10-14 20:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2008-10-14 20:30 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: Revert omap3 WDT changes to avoid merge conflict (Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree) Tony Lindgren
2008-10-14 20:40 ` Russell King
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-22 15:08 linux-next: Tree for Oct 22 Thierry Reding
2013-10-22 15:08 ` linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 15:20 ` Dmitry Kravkov
2008-08-25 1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-26 22:20 ` Russell King
2008-08-26 23:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-10 4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-10 6:29 ` pHilipp Zabel
2008-07-10 7:30 ` Russell King
2008-07-04 6:57 Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-07 9:12 ` Russell King
2008-07-07 10:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200810140107.14647.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=felipe.balbi@nokia.com \
--cc=khasim@ti.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r-woodruff2@ti.com \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).