From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:08:05 -0700 Message-ID: <20081014200805.GF8150@atomide.com> References: <20081014132745.051f6418.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081014075950.GA22855@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <200810140107.14647.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mho-01-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.178]:53204 "EHLO mho-01-bos.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751955AbYJNUIY (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:08:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200810140107.14647.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Brownell Cc: Russell King , Stephen Rothwell , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Richard Woodruff , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi , Wim Van Sebroeck , Syed Mohammed Khasim * David Brownell [081014 11:53]: > On Tuesday 14 October 2008, Russell King wrote: > > Since the OMAP updates I merged from Tony are already broken due to > > missing definitions, and I'm not getting any response from Tony on > > fixing those, I just sent you a fix for that few hours ago. > Probably has to do with his travel plans, which he mentioned > last week (Thursday?). I think he's back online in the next > day or two. >=20 >=20 > > I will be dropping the problematical updates so we can=20 > > at least keep mainline OMAP in a buildable state. =A0That seems to = mean > > dropping the new OMAP3 support. Yes, I'm back online. And please don't drop these patches, sounds like this is a trivial merge issue. Regards, Tony