From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:03:08 +1100 Message-ID: <20090328010308.9c41e94e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090327114035.d039243a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090327082859.6127990a@pedra.chehab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__28_Mar_2009_01_03_08_+1100_5XoMiaMuqN+ogbES" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:44029 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752373AbZC0ODS (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:03:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090327082859.6127990a@pedra.chehab.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Mike Isely --Signature=_Sat__28_Mar_2009_01_03_08_+1100_5XoMiaMuqN+ogbES Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mauro, On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:28:59 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > This was fixed by this patch: > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/14545/ >=20 > What's weird is that, after noticing it, I folded this patch together wit= h the > original one. Maybe I forgot to push it or I've pushed after your pull. > Probably you won't have problem on today's build. Thanks. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Sat__28_Mar_2009_01_03_08_+1100_5XoMiaMuqN+ogbES Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknM3JwACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wFkACePPaUiD4ZhVc7a2M8bTY2jN2u aCEAn2tTdFooDTIwbiOdm2P0UDK73H9w =Yo4i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__28_Mar_2009_01_03_08_+1100_5XoMiaMuqN+ogbES--