From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: comedi: Range_table and range_table_list Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:25:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20090427152557.GB23851@kroah.com> References: <87skjvf5o8.fsf@free.fr> <20090427023822.GA7060@kroah.com> <72cf3fb0904270137s4ac40211i8965ef0110fad7dd@mail.gmail.com> <20090427195620.41376d41.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:36798 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756241AbZD0Pbu (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:31:50 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090427195620.41376d41.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Alexis Berlemont , linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:56:20PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Also, are we going to have problems if the original developers of things > in the staging tree are unwilling to take updates back into their trees? > Or is this just a procedural thing i.e. do they only want things fed back > after they have been in the staging tree? Will this change if their work > ends up in the kernel proper? The upstream comedi tree should now be "dead" as everything is now fed into mainline and linux-next through staging. So everything should be good. thanks, greg k-h