From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 22:55:33 -0400 Message-ID: <20090505025532.GA7917@tuxdriver.com> References: <20090505115455.0b147aeb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:42219 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751368AbZEEDBG (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 23:01:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090505115455.0b147aeb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "Luis R. Rodriguez" On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:54:55AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi John, > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64_allmodconfig) failed like this: > > net/mac80211/mlme.c: In function 'ieee80211_enable_ht': > net/mac80211/mlme.c:126: error: 'IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_HT40PLUS' undeclared (first use in this function) > net/mac80211/mlme.c:131: error: 'IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_HT40MINUS' undeclared (first use in this function) > > Direct cause is commit b3afed6815165a62d20e4487ec2df0d12a2df20d > ("mac80211: check if HT40+/- is allowed before sending assoc"). > > I have used the wireless tree from next-20090504 for today. > > [You guys build this stuff, right? :-(] Ooops, sorry! I had to drop a few patches and I didn't get wireless-next-2.6 pushed back out correctly. It is fixed now. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.