From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: Next May 11 : BUG during scsi initialization Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:56:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20090512065601.GA19079@wotan.suse.de> References: <20090511161442.3e9d9cb9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A081002.4050802@in.ibm.com> <20090511115233.GB8112@parisc-linux.org> <4A081437.7000409@in.ibm.com> <20090511122135.GC8112@parisc-linux.org> <20090512045716.GC32535@wotan.suse.de> <20090512155613.881fa2ec.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090512055918.GF32535@wotan.suse.de> <20090512160352.4a97d2f4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090512165245.78b6bf83.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090512165245.78b6bf83.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Sachin Sant , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Pekka Enberg List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:52:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On Tue, 12 May 2009 16:03:52 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > This is what I have been getting for the last few days: > > bisected into the net changes, I will follow up there, sorry. No problem. Phew, yours was looking like a nasty one if it was indeed an SLQB bug ;) Thanks, Nick