From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 15 Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:36:36 +1000 Message-ID: <20090519093636.329c4708.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090515153733.4384db9f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090515130729.GA13026@aftab> <20090518000734.6fd3d652.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090518094822.GB4905@aftab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__19_May_2009_09_36_36_+1000_+eSWqH0akSo08nj." Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:50495 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751696AbZERXgl (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2009 19:36:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090518094822.GB4905@aftab> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Doug Thompson --Signature=_Tue__19_May_2009_09_36_36_+1000_+eSWqH0akSo08nj. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Boris, On Mon, 18 May 2009 11:48:22 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote: > > It is an EDAC module for AMD k8, Fam10h and Fam11h processors. OK, so I will call it edac-amd (in case we ever get a generic edac tree). > > If so, you are not listed as a maintainer of that code (Doug cc'd). >=20 > I'll send a patch to update that later. Thanks for all the info - I just had no idea where this was coming from. I will add the tree from today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__19_May_2009_09_36_36_+1000_+eSWqH0akSo08nj. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoR8QQACgkQjjKRsyhoI8y0WwCgiE+dbDfvztYEqNbJSbVism6Q GpMAnRNmSWzUCGiIsjcOUJ59asojy9gr =d2hV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__19_May_2009_09_36_36_+1000_+eSWqH0akSo08nj.--