From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: drbd tree build failure Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:32:50 +1000 Message-ID: <20090818153250.5ce293b5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090729152938.791a81c3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__18_Aug_2009_15_32_50_+1000_hPJQkj64O8=/s.mY" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Philipp Reisner , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Tue__18_Aug_2009_15_32_50_+1000_hPJQkj64O8=/s.mY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Martin, Jens, On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:47:48 -0400 "Martin K. Petersen" wrote: > > >>>>> "Stephen" =3D=3D Stephen Rothwell writes: >=20 > Stephen> drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c: In function > Stephen> 'drbd_setup_queue_param': drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c:707: > Stephen> error: implicit declaration of function > Stephen> 'blk_queue_stack_limits' >=20 > We've decided to keep blk_queue_stack_limits as a wrapper to ease the > transition. I sent Jens a patch earlier today that does this. I am still getting this error (3 weeks later) ... :-( Maybe my original patch should be applied to the drbd tree? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__18_Aug_2009_15_32_50_+1000_hPJQkj64O8=/s.mY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqKPQIACgkQjjKRsyhoI8z8JgCgp2ofV77nzlTBb2L/XSRstZZE eDYAnA6Rdm6rhTrf5ZqQVJBnpuLogZle =Zmer -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__18_Aug_2009_15_32_50_+1000_hPJQkj64O8=/s.mY--