From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joel Becker Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ocfs2 tree with Linus' tree Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:14:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20090923031450.GB29799@mail.oracle.com> References: <20090923104537.2885f67a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from rcsinet12.oracle.com ([148.87.113.124]:23741 "EHLO rgminet12.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753974AbZIWDQi (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:16:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090923104537.2885f67a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:45:37AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the ocfs2 tree got conflicts in > arch/x86/ia32/ia32entry.S, arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_32.h, > arch/x86/include/asm/unistd_64.h and arch/x86/kernel/syscall_table_32.S > between various commits from Linus' tree and commit > 25767b48501de19421ae86c406b2dd42df37baf3 ("fs: Add the reflink() > operation and reflinkat(2) system call") from the ocfs2 tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a short while. Given > the ongoing discussions about this patch with Linus, however, it may be > worth dropping for now? The syscall is dropping while it's reworked. I should have a tree up shortly without the syscall. Joel -- Life's Little Instruction Book #15 "Own a great stereo system." Joel Becker Principal Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com Phone: (650) 506-8127