From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:56:45 +1100 Message-ID: <20100111185645.a66c6c8a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20100111133109.a191ee64.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100110.225055.167520274.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__11_Jan_2010_18_56_45_+1100_FCvLUpN6y=Y5Iowp" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:51949 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751651Ab0AKH4w (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:56:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100110.225055.167520274.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hawk@comx.dk, hadi@cyberus.ca --Signature=_Mon__11_Jan_2010_18_56_45_+1100_FCvLUpN6y=Y5Iowp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave, On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:50:55 -0800 (PST) David Miller = wrote: > > That latter commit is specially in the net-next-2.6 tree not the > net-2.6 tree. What you call "net-next-2.6", I have always called "net". What you call "net-2.6", I have always called "net-current". Would you like me to change the names? > I'll merge net-2.6 into net-next-2.6 to resolve this, thanks! Thanks. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__11_Jan_2010_18_56_45_+1100_FCvLUpN6y=Y5Iowp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktK2b0ACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wb9gCgrW4lQuWPRFEo4l/rnS4PFr+G InEAnRtMnUgl/Fb3rOMv+sW/97DTvnsq =J45b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__11_Jan_2010_18_56_45_+1100_FCvLUpN6y=Y5Iowp--