From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:11:01 +1100 Message-ID: <20100226101101.136af742.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20100225141022.c5b3b7ce.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100225074757.GN1025@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__26_Feb_2010_10_11_01_+1100_=rTTqY6SNipC+2T=" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:48295 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934453Ab0BYXLJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:11:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100225074757.GN1025@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Alan D. Brunelle" --Signature=_Fri__26_Feb_2010_10_11_01_+1100_=rTTqY6SNipC+2T= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jens, On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:47:57 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote: > > I was, unfortunately I forgot to resolve the conflict yesterday. Your > fix confuses me a bit - I was expecting the first hunk, but what is the > second hunk doing? Conceptually good though, perhaps there are more > conflicts than I was expecting :-) The second hunk was not part of the conflict, but "git diff" gives us more than just the conflicted bit of the file. > I'll update here as well so it disappears next time you pull. Thanks. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__26_Feb_2010_10_11_01_+1100_=rTTqY6SNipC+2T= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuHA4UACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wqMQCfWDdZKat8w83QhL2lKMSUAaH+ fCQAoI538OmFRIFPtIaulSWtkXHPvR63 =4tSU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__26_Feb_2010_10_11_01_+1100_=rTTqY6SNipC+2T=--