From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext3 tree Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:36:34 +1100 Message-ID: <20100302113634.2c7f5e03.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__2_Mar_2010_11_36_34_+1100_7e.1yNpQWT63jmxs" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:37583 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751694Ab0CBAgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:36:40 -0500 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig --Signature=_Tue__2_Mar_2010_11_36_34_+1100_7e.1yNpQWT63jmxs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jan, After merging the ext3 tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c: In function 'xtSplitRoot': fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c:1256: error: 'rec' undeclared (first use in this functio= n) Caused by commit bff3333e868578990f6fe794a7cba0c74bd433ac ("dquot: cleanup space allocation / freeing routines"). This is annoying ... this file system could be build tested on any architecture, so why wasn't it? I have used the version of the ext3 tree from next-20100301 for today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__2_Mar_2010_11_36_34_+1100_7e.1yNpQWT63jmxs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuMXZIACgkQjjKRsyhoI8zB6gCfQiUurYdliX+mQor1kI0inL4p HTwAoI/zvGpzfkiUJKTBSoG1kZx8ZGmh =nOQU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__2_Mar_2010_11_36_34_+1100_7e.1yNpQWT63jmxs--