From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Also export the weak version of perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:20:43 +1100 Message-ID: <20100312172043.aa034ede.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20100312150003.afd9b59a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100312055043.GB5014@nowhere> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__12_Mar_2010_17_20_43_+1100_IAFj4Vxo/Hfc3fXG" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:33737 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753110Ab0CLGUu (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:20:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100312055043.GB5014@nowhere> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Fri__12_Mar_2010_17_20_43_+1100_IAFj4Vxo/Hfc3fXG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Frederic, On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:50:44 +0100 Frederic Weisbecker = wrote: > > Does that fixes the issue? Sorry I can not test for now... I can't test it right now, sorry, but I have heard that EXPORT_SYMBOL's for weak symbols must be in a different file from the actual symbol definition. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__12_Mar_2010_17_20_43_+1100_IAFj4Vxo/Hfc3fXG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuZ3TsACgkQjjKRsyhoI8xDvQCeLSlUTlelHntXFYNIDrHf+tNj tgsAoJ8pSI1n8z93eWXL8hOi7X878fLM =0AnT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__12_Mar_2010_17_20_43_+1100_IAFj4Vxo/Hfc3fXG--