From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 02:51:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20100528015145.GI31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20100528114539.012ff1d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:57802 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755132Ab0E1Bvs (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 21:51:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100528114539.012ff1d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Josef Bacik , Chris Mason , Nick Piggin On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:45:39AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Al, > > After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c:1852: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before 'int' > arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/file.c:1871: error: 'spufs_mfc_fsync' undeclared here (not in a function) Tpyo in fsync patch (missing comma in line 1852 there) > Caused by commit 05b2fc7d1f1046fef1199e1a4d2f63df998ef3aa ("drop unused > dentry argument to ->fsync"). > My merge of the vfs tree was also bad because commit > facd07b07d2a7988f5ce849558838cc953847637 ("direct-io: add a hook for the > fs to provide its own submit_bio function") that entered Linus' tree in > the past 24 hours changed the prototype of __blockdev_direct_IO() and > that probably needs reflecting in the new __blockdev_direct_IO_newtrunc(). OK, I'll rebase that stuff.