Hi All,

On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:52:08 +0100 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> JFYI:
> I pulled in patches from linux-2.6-block#for-next (up to commit
> 6573422f81efa3bd71848dc584c35d4318d3de0b):
> "Merge branch 'for-2.6.38/core' into for-next"
> ...into linux-next (next-20110107) and now I get:
> 
> $ grep block build_linux-next_next20110107.dileks.2.log
> 30886 blocks
>   CC      fs/block_dev.o
>   CC      mm/memblock.o
>   CC      kernel/power/block_io.o
> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i386_none/kernel/trace/blktrace.c:999:2:
> warning: passing argument 1 of ‘register_trace_block_bio_complete’
> from incompatible pointer type
> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i386_none/include/trace/events/block.h:240:1:
> note: expected ‘void (*)(void *, struct request_queue *, struct bio *,
> int)’ but argument is of type ‘void (*)(void *, struct request_queue
> *, struct bio *)’
> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i386_none/kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1038:2:
> warning: passing argument 1 of ‘unregister_trace_block_bio_complete’
> from incompatible pointer type
> /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i386_none/include/trace/events/block.h:240:1:
> note: expected ‘void (*)(void *, struct request_queue *, struct bio *,
> int)’ but argument is of type ‘void (*)(void *, struct request_queue
> *, struct bio *)’

I reported that separately today and Mathieu Desnoyers (cc'd) has said
that he will supply a patch.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/