From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: fix 88pm8607.c printk format warning Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 09:05:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20110526090522.5d8c684b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20110518145412.f6cba4ef.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110518100722.76bd6fb6.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20110518194311.GB5077@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1305978663.3317.7.camel@odin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1305978663.3317.7.camel@odin> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Liam Girdwood Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Stephen Rothwell , Haojian Zhuang , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Mark Brown List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 21 May 2011 12:51:03 +0100 Liam Girdwood wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:43 -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 10:07:22AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > From: Randy Dunlap > > > > > > Fix printk format warning (seen on x86_64) and change to unsigned > > > output format: > > > > > > drivers/regulator/88pm8607.c:417: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'resource_size_t' > > > > Acked-by: Mark Brown > > -- > > Samuel, this doesn't apply against regulator-next. Iirc, the patches > this is against went via mfd-next ? If, so any chance you could take > this ? > > Thanks ! > > Liam Samuel, Do you need this patch resent to you? thanks, --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***