From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:47:05 +1000 Message-ID: <20110620144705.c9a5513b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__20_Jun_2011_14_47_05_+1000_1QboXMiol9YMg_sE" Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Mon__20_Jun_2011_14_47_05_+1000_1QboXMiol9YMg_sE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Paul, Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got conflicts in kernel/rcutree.c and kernel/rcutree_plugin.h between various commits from the tip tree and various commits from the rcu tree. I can't easily resolve these, so I have dropped the rcu tree for today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__20_Jun_2011_14_47_05_+1000_1QboXMiol9YMg_sE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN/tDJAAoJEDMEi1NhKgbsQsUIAImC8bzTGHGr7mIq3+97L7Po aCAJH0q1QFyJGDhMtwd03pc8y8H19OYaIJBzXOVGhJUxknl3Xxtm9BOCgtkplXP+ 0njNhJ/cfDgne8NnSNKiumVXfr+brwJiC/BM8Q1TpB3awniNbrI3I+9w2y8+ybYK AWV2cUihdWv6deu+enGXttcYDYrimAQhUiWERvXB/sRtMcCe4Hmkjg+WSx5Iy1MD f0Ln9Z3SHZomLiJ5aXllw9W1nymZ9jd0K6B2EpvbCvVh09hy/mdm82FnvBjlREId xznBxGS+rCykKxMJqzDCM64PEYdSMkR2Qk3vvNcbbtWU/YBWYvwprmMD173n6oM= =dPFc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__20_Jun_2011_14_47_05_+1000_1QboXMiol9YMg_sE--