From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:17:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20110620151722.GA2933@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20110620144705.c9a5513b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:48767 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751276Ab1FTPSY (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:18:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110620144705.c9a5513b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 02:47:05PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got conflicts in > kernel/rcutree.c and kernel/rcutree_plugin.h between various commits from > the tip tree and various commits from the rcu tree. > > I can't easily resolve these, so I have dropped the rcu tree for today. I will be resolving these shortly, please accept my apologies for the hassle. Thanx, Paul