From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the
 staging.current tree
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:43:48 -0700
Message-ID: <20110628144348.GA9290@kroah.com>
References: <20110609165804.2e96bb77.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20110609184206.GC2760@kroah.com>
 <20110609205111.GB32526@kroah.com>
 <DE6BB9BF2B09415FACB0F74F3CF4CF5C@Main>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:52208 "EHLO
	out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758322Ab1F1On6 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:43:58 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DE6BB9BF2B09415FACB0F74F3CF4CF5C@Main>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Arjan Mels <arjan.mels@gmx.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matt mooney <mfm@muteddisk.com>

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 04:07:25PM +0200, Arjan Mels wrote:
> Greg, Stephen,
> 
> Below mentioned patch does not seem to have made it into the
> linux-next tree (and other stable branches).

What do you mean by "other stable branches"?

> What do I need to do to correct this?

I don't understand what you are wanting to correct, please be explicit
as I am totally confused.

greg k-h