From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 15 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:03:26 +0100 Message-ID: <201111152203.26186.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20111115131742.f9ebaf818fd152ef779f4d19@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:40958 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755562Ab1KOVAn (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:00:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111115131742.f9ebaf818fd152ef779f4d19@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Tejun Heo On Tuesday, November 15, 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The patch is still absent from kernel.org. > > Changes since 20111114: > > The m86knommu tree lost 2 conflicts. > > The pm tree still had its build failures for which I reverted a commit > and applied a patch. Hmm. If that was the patch you sent yestarday, it definitely is there in my tree. The "kill unused set_freezable_with_signal()" commit still has to be reverted, unfortunately, but Tejun is working on a fix (AFAICS). I'm going to drop pm-freezer from my linux-next branch for now. Thanks, Rafael