From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:14:04 -0500 Message-ID: <20111116001404.GD12453@fieldses.org> References: <20111116102952.d653d19f69ca5a7fad8a0291@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:57554 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757629Ab1KPAOG (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:14:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111116102952.d653d19f69ca5a7fad8a0291@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:29:52AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:4446:5: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before 'void' > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c: In function 'nfsd_forget_locks': > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:4468:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'nfsd_release_n_owners' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > Caused by commit 16bfdaafa2c6 ("nfsd4: share open and lock owner hash > tables"). Please build test *before* releasing code ... :-( I do--so what happened? Aie, sorry, I see: we added a CONFIG_NFSD_FAULT_INJECTION recently, but I didn't add that to my configs.... OK, I've fixed up my test scripts, and I'll push out a fix soon. --b. > > I have used the nfsd tree from next-20111115 for today. > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au > http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/