From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with Linus' tree Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:55:03 +0000 Message-ID: <201111241555.03715.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20111124115805.d2b5cdc699b9d6ed300b9c09@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:64030 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754742Ab1KXP5l (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:57:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111124115805.d2b5cdc699b9d6ed300b9c09@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jamie Iles On Thursday 24 November 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/Kconfig between commit eccab1ec87d0 > ("net/cadence: enable by default NET_ATMEL") from Linus' tree and commit > f75ba50bdc2b ("macb: initial support for Cadence GEM") from the arm-soc > tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Yes, looks good. Thanks, Arnd