From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:30:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20111128113056.2099e4c3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20111116113007.5656a7b4823ba085a46c57ae@canb.auug.org.au> <20111125124913.405fc8360a185f3116adb5ec@canb.auug.org.au> <20111125103011.18e167cd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20111128135317.a99880b234c6c060a622fa31@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:53235 "EHLO earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752213Ab1K1L3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 06:29:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111128135317.a99880b234c6c060a622fa31@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dave Airlie , Dave Airlie , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:53:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:34:19 +0000 Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > I just pushed jbarnes patch into my tree for now, at pushed out the > > mainline gma500 code with it. > > And it is a mess (see my linux-next reports). Well its very hard to sort stuff out when you are juggling a cross tree set of dependancies and someone pointlessly stops one of them being visible in next for ten days. Whatever. I'm onto it, but I think blocking -next merges for staging breakage is broken to the point that -next needs fixing, or we should kill staging off. Alan