From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:18:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20111128131847.48bffb93@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20111116113007.5656a7b4823ba085a46c57ae@canb.auug.org.au> <20111125124913.405fc8360a185f3116adb5ec@canb.auug.org.au> <20111125103011.18e167cd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20111128135317.a99880b234c6c060a622fa31@canb.auug.org.au> <20111128113056.2099e4c3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20111129001353.399142710ab77822b29552f0@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:53799 "EHLO earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751013Ab1K1NRX (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 08:17:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111129001353.399142710ab77822b29552f0@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dave Airlie , Dave Airlie , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes > > Well its very hard to sort stuff out when you are juggling a cross tree > > set of dependancies and someone pointlessly stops one of them being > > visible in next for ten days. > > The mess in the drm tree has nothing to do with the staging tree. I would suggest you re-read the paragraph above, and the mails I sent you about marking the staging gma500 tree broken (which given nothing happened in response to any of them I imagine you didn't). And if you still think that blocking the DRM tree from -next for ten days thus stopping all sorts of other integration work and forcing people's hands on moving from staging and the like didn't cause the problems and is the right policy then we'll just have to agree to differ. Alan