From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [GIT PULL/NEXT] sched/arch: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler callback Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:50:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20120313095020.GA13220@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120313110840.7b444deb6b1bb902c15f3cdf@canb.auug.org.au> <20120313061622.GA24357@elte.hu> <20120313083310.GA27560@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120313083630.GA10131@elte.hu> <20120313084713.GB27560@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120313085628.GB6991@elte.hu> <20120313090040.GE27560@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120313092649.GA15406@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:52719 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759774Ab2CMJul (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 05:50:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120313092649.GA15406@elte.hu> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Peter Zijlstra On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:26:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > As I said it in my first mail, doing that is unnecessary - but > if you insist on being difficult then Catalin, feel free to pull > the patch from tip:sched/arch: Nope, I'm not taking the tree anymore, you've refused to behave in a reasonable way. Your problem to sort out now. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: