From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:20:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20120620.012037.783895812206310043.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20120620133348.a9ff31a72ffd11818f574fe3@canb.auug.org.au> <4FE18502.6040409@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FE18502.6040409@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: viresh.kumar2@arm.com Cc: bhupesh.sharma@st.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, federico.vaga@gmail.com, giancarlo.asnaghi@st.com, wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, spear-devel@list.st.com List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org From: viresh kumar Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:08:34 +0100 > Please see following patchset from me, that got applied in linux-next > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/24/154 > > Please check if this patchset is present in your build repo. I believe it should be > there. If it is, then you shouldn't get these errors. Well, then Stephen shouldn't get those errors either. But obviously he did. But all of this talk about changes existing only in linux-next is entirely moot. Because The damn thing MUST build independently inside of net-next which doesn't have those clock layer changes. Someone send me a clean fix for net-next now.