From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:26:04 +1000 Message-ID: <20120620202604.407af721f746045ae00c8268@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20120620133348.a9ff31a72ffd11818f574fe3@canb.auug.org.au> <4FE18502.6040409@arm.com> <20120620.012037.783895812206310043.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA256"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__20_Jun_2012_20_26_04_+1000_Pt2R0QMfCktuvVXA" Return-path: Received: from haggis.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.10]:54992 "EHLO members.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753093Ab2FTK0R (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:26:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120620.012037.783895812206310043.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: viresh.kumar2@arm.com, bhupesh.sharma@st.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, federico.vaga@gmail.com, giancarlo.asnaghi@st.com, wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, spear-devel@list.st.com, Andrew Morton --Signature=_Wed__20_Jun_2012_20_26_04_+1000_Pt2R0QMfCktuvVXA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 01:20:37 -0700 (PDT) David Miller = wrote: > > From: viresh kumar > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:08:34 +0100 >=20 > > Please see following patchset from me, that got applied in linux-next > >=20 > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/24/154 > >=20 > > Please check if this patchset is present in your build repo. I believe = it should be > > there. If it is, then you shouldn't get these errors. >=20 > Well, then Stephen shouldn't get those errors either. >=20 > But obviously he did. >=20 > But all of this talk about changes existing only in linux-next is > entirely moot. Because The damn thing MUST build independently inside > of net-next which doesn't have those clock layer changes. >=20 > Someone send me a clean fix for net-next now. I get those errors because those patches are in the akpm tree which is merged after everything else ... One possibility is to put those changes in another (stable) tree and merge that into the net-next tree (and any other tree that needs it). --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au --Signature=_Wed__20_Jun_2012_20_26_04_+1000_Pt2R0QMfCktuvVXA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP4aU8AAoJEECxmPOUX5FESSkQAKpF+Pf7CDj+K4cG37IdcOeE GZ7vji+MG9baDypNtp2CAPQOS2aYZeO4YBbBDg1UIDmDfltdi8iEpwpfPkIZDEzt yIfUN2O4RgvQ/reoxtp9aJ8DKbdOK+eO+zA4h1fdDRzsLMGZO7aWQOv0LbnC0Prz VX6nJHyloHsOWD3kX3e5j4Fq241EPR+sTC4DRnqMNI5esu1rwuNCx1TAPqVEO8xq AlVpKoBV+MTICylBAwspdv8cr6o2hsz99szPHMRgRPZ30qvbkdx2to7xCvSj4wgb 76+Tj5gUZZ4aQMMRKKpGIp151NTZ1aD9Hlg24GcwmKJz21XAi8PTmWa/fptZ1EfO HeE6RCwxsoDMhL+EKXd1gmunmzQTvzMqAQsJEHVGVEAYA/70M4+K8g0tlZmleM22 WuUITytjY/gWQDRo3dauRAvb2LlkbEGFPw8b+zyqj5I0VFEH6K+v7NSscuOmPsYV RUuxwqMu+LHgjhp43n/i53eGxks4WDMSOz1uOc/3y7vVG5yNg5TxW/s+CX3NTq7p rUqG91VC2I0Wym40lrQmVo/L5E2qEQioOzy+YROBQO5LPJzzVmCtjZImyc32jOzj n/qXtP3gkjux3yQncUN70NH3Unm2eSVtUI6SxaABEjqXbQkNvuKO38YRFnhtU3Ol 2WfQVOxHGTEnwgzwnS+2 =keoq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__20_Jun_2012_20_26_04_+1000_Pt2R0QMfCktuvVXA--