From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the omap_dss2 tree Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:43:39 +0000 Message-ID: <201209241243.39462.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20120924195305.588277e94ce701abc5e5a6c5@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:55580 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754612Ab2IXMnu (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:43:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120924195305.588277e94ce701abc5e5a6c5@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomi Valkeinen On Monday 24 September 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in > drivers/video/omap/lcd_ams_delta.c between commit 9586778de558 ("OMAPFB1: > remove unnecessary includes") from the tree and commit e27e35ec735f > ("ARM: OMAP1: Move board-ams-delta.h from plat to mach") from the arm-soc > tree. > > The latter removed a superset of the former (as far as include files is > concerned), so I used that and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). > Hi Stephen, I looked at all your reports and your fixes are looking good to me. I'm already building all ARM defconfigs now and have fixup patches for the instances that went wrong or introduced new warnings, I'll do that again on top of today's linux-next tree. The merge window is going to be fun with all those conflicts, but I don't have a better idea either. Arnd