From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:51:34 +0200 Message-ID: <201209251351.35007.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20120925143034.f7bda6d8a5a11e87f2e60ef3@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([193.178.161.156]:43447 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755818Ab2IYLpB (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:45:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120925143034.f7bda6d8a5a11e87f2e60ef3@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Andre Przywara On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > failed like this: > > drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: In function 'transition_frequency_pstate': > drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:991:19: error: 'HW_PSTATE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) > drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:991:19: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:992:19: error: 'struct powernow_k8_data' has no member named 'max_hw_pstate' > drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:995:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_khz_freq_from_pstate' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:996:8: error: 'struct powernow_k8_data' has no member named 'currpstate' > drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1004:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'transition_pstate' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: At top level: > drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:981:12: warning: 'transition_frequency_pstate' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > > The code causing this was removed by commit e1f0b8e9b04a ("cpufreq: > Remove support for hardware P-state chips from powernow-k8") but > reintroduced (presumably incorrectly) by commit d20801be3c11 ("Merge > branch 'master' into linux-next"). > > I have used the pm tree from next-20120924 for today. It looks like I got the merge wrong. Sorry about that, I'll fix it up later today. Thanks, Rafael