From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the thermal tree Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:11:03 -0700 Message-ID: <20120925151103.GB18777@kroah.com> References: <20120925161355.06cfe875c78bc163b050ed8c@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:44195 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753351Ab2IYPLG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:11:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120925161355.06cfe875c78bc163b050ed8c@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eduardo Valentin , Durgadoss R , Zhang Rui On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 04:13:55PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/omap-thermal/omap-thermal-common.c between commit > 82d3a76a88cd ("Thermal: Pass zone parameters as argument to > tzd_register") from the thermal tree and commit 765a1939a364 ("staging: > omap-thermal: fix polling period settings") from the staging tree. > > I just used the thermal tree version and can carry the fix as necessary > (no action is required). That sounds correct to me, thanks. greg k-h