From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the workqueues tree Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:39:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20120925223934.GC6282@kroah.com> References: <20120924163609.4f274e6340b92cea66eceb40@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:41959 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750911Ab2IYWjg (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:39:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120924163609.4f274e6340b92cea66eceb40@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Sourav Poddar On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:36:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got a conflict in > drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c between commit 43829731dd37 ("workqueue: > deprecate flush[_delayed]_work_sync()") from the workqueues tree and > commit ac57e7f38ea6 ("serial: omap: Remove unnecessary checks from > suspend/resume") from the tty tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Looks fine to me, thanks. greg k-h