From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:37:42 -0800 Message-ID: <20121113213742.292f3ace.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20121114163042.64f0c0495663331b9c2d60d6@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:58821 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750906Ab2KNFhr (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:37:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121114163042.64f0c0495663331b9c2d60d6@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus , Ingo Molnar , Hugh Dickins On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:30:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > News: next-20121115 (i.e. tomorrow) will be the last release until > next-20121126 (which should be just be after -rc7, I guess - assuming > that Linus does not release v3.7 before then), so if you want something > in linux-next for a reasonable amount of testing, it should probably be > committed tomorrow. It would help if the old sched/numa code wasn't in -next while you're away. That would give me a clean run at 3.7 and will make it easier for others to integrate and test the four(!) different autoschednumacore implementations on top of linux-next. Pretty please? Also, I need to get a fresh mmotm into -next tomorrow. Don't do anything until I've pulled that rabbit out of the hat :)