Hi James,

Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got a conflict in
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c between commit a7f2a366f623 ("ima:
fallback to MODULE_SIG_ENFORCE for existing kernel module syscall") from
Linus' tree and commit 750943a30714 ("ima: remove enforce checking
duplication") from the security tree.

I think I fixed it up (see below).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index dba965d,cd00ba3..0000000
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@@ -291,18 -275,10 +275,18 @@@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ima_file_check)
   */
  int ima_module_check(struct file *file)
  {
- 	int rc = 0;
- 
 -	if (!file)
 +	if (!file) {
 +		if (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES) {
 +#ifndef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE
- 			rc = -EACCES;	/* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
++			return -EACCES;	/* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
++#else
++			return 0;
 +#endif
 +		}
- 	} else
- 		rc = process_measurement(file, file->f_dentry->d_name.name,
- 					 MAY_EXEC, MODULE_CHECK);
- 	return (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE) ? rc : 0;
+ 		return -EACCES;	/* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */
++	}
+ 	return process_measurement(file, file->f_dentry->d_name.name,
+ 				   MAY_EXEC, MODULE_CHECK);
  }
  
  static int __init init_ima(void)