From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the virtio tree with the rr-fixes tree Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:59:35 +0530 Message-ID: <20130402052935.GB15084@amit.redhat.com> References: <20130402141739.0d0b45f519be505a7da471ac@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7766 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759996Ab3DBF3o (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:29:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130402141739.0d0b45f519be505a7da471ac@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Rusty Russell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (Tue) 02 Apr 2013 [14:17:39], Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rusty, > > Today's linux-next merge of the virtio tree got a conflict in > drivers/char/virtio_console.c between commit 9ba5c80b1aea ("virtio: > console: add locking around c_ovq operations") from the rr-fixes tree and > commit 6797999d9958 ("virtio_console: use simplified virtqueue > accessors") from the virtio tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Looks OK, just a context change. Thanks, Amit