* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2013-04-18 1:34 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-04-18 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Al Viro, Alex Elder, Yan, Zheng
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2146 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/addr.c between commit 496ad9aa8ef4 ("new helper: file_inode
(file)") from Linus' tree and commit 42f94fe2cf50 ("ceph: revert commit
22cddde104") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ceph/addr.c
index a60ea97,068d2c8..0000000
--- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
@@@ -1066,29 -1104,10 +1104,10 @@@ static int ceph_write_begin(struct fil
loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
struct page **pagep, void **fsdata)
{
- struct inode *inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
+ struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
- struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
- struct ceph_file_info *fi = file->private_data;
struct page *page;
pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
- int r, want, got = 0;
-
- if (fi->fmode & CEPH_FILE_MODE_LAZY)
- want = CEPH_CAP_FILE_BUFFER | CEPH_CAP_FILE_LAZYIO;
- else
- want = CEPH_CAP_FILE_BUFFER;
-
- dout("write_begin %p %llx.%llx %llu~%u getting caps. i_size %llu\n",
- inode, ceph_vinop(inode), pos, len, inode->i_size);
- r = ceph_get_caps(ci, CEPH_CAP_FILE_WR, want, &got, pos+len);
- if (r < 0)
- return r;
- dout("write_begin %p %llx.%llx %llu~%u got cap refs on %s\n",
- inode, ceph_vinop(inode), pos, len, ceph_cap_string(got));
- if (!(got & (CEPH_CAP_FILE_BUFFER|CEPH_CAP_FILE_LAZYIO))) {
- ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, got);
- return -EAGAIN;
- }
+ int r;
do {
/* get a page */
@@@ -1124,8 -1134,7 +1134,7 @@@ static int ceph_write_end(struct file *
loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned copied,
struct page *page, void *fsdata)
{
- struct inode *inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
+ struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
- struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
struct ceph_fs_client *fsc = ceph_inode_to_client(inode);
struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc = fsc->mdsc;
unsigned from = pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1);
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2013-07-10 1:24 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2013-07-10 3:57 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2013-07-10 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Sage Weil, linux-next, linux-kernel, Linus
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got conflicts in
> drivers/block/rbd.c and net/ceph/osd_client.c because the ceph tree was
> rebased before being sent to Linus and it looks like one patch
> was dropped and several more added.
>
> I just used the upstream version of the cpeh tree for today - please
> clean up.
Fixed, thanks!
sage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2013-07-10 1:24 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-10 3:57 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-07-10 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Linus
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 403 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got conflicts in
drivers/block/rbd.c and net/ceph/osd_client.c because the ceph tree was
rebased before being sent to Linus and it looks like one patch
was dropped and several more added.
I just used the upstream version of the cpeh tree for today - please
clean up.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2013-06-19 1:22 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-06-19 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Alex Elder, Al Viro
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1058 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
drivers/block/rbd.c between commit db2a144bedd5
("block_device_operations->release() should return void") from Linus'
tree and commit 87f11b7221f7 ("rbd: don't hold ctl_mutex to get/put
device") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
BTW, Sage, there is no Signed-off-by for you in the ceph tree commit (and
several others - even though you committed them).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/block/rbd.c
index 3063452,f24e241..0000000
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@@ -507,9 -505,9 +505,7 @@@ static void rbd_release(struct gendisk
spin_unlock_irq(&rbd_dev->lock);
rbd_assert(open_count_before > 0);
- mutex_lock_nested(&ctl_mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
put_device(&rbd_dev->dev);
- mutex_unlock(&ctl_mutex);
-
- return 0;
}
static const struct block_device_operations rbd_bd_ops = {
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2012-07-31 1:58 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-07-31 1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Alex Elder
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 442 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
net/ceph/messenger.c between commit 5bdca4e0768d ("libceph: fix messenger
retry") from Linus' tree and commit ab166d5aa3bc ("libceph: separate
banner and connect writes") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (removed the calls to ceph_con_out_kvec_reset()) and can
carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2012-07-21 23:16 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-07-21 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Alex Elder
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1828 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
net/ceph/messenger.c between commit 5bdca4e0768d ("libceph: fix messenger
retry") from Linus' tree and commit e22004235a90 ("libceph: rename
kvec_reset and kvec_add functions") from the ceph tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc net/ceph/messenger.c
index 10255e8,23073cf..0000000
--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@@ -1450,11 -1530,11 +1530,11 @@@ static int process_connect(struct ceph_
* If we sent a smaller connect_seq than the peer has, try
* again with a larger value.
*/
- dout("process_connect got RETRY my seq = %u, peer_seq = %u\n",
+ dout("process_connect got RETRY_SESSION my seq %u, peer %u\n",
le32_to_cpu(con->out_connect.connect_seq),
- le32_to_cpu(con->in_connect.connect_seq));
- con->connect_seq = le32_to_cpu(con->in_connect.connect_seq);
+ le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.connect_seq));
+ con->connect_seq = le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.connect_seq);
- ceph_con_out_kvec_reset(con);
+ con_out_kvec_reset(con);
ret = prepare_write_connect(con);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@@ -1468,10 -1548,10 +1548,10 @@@
*/
dout("process_connect got RETRY_GLOBAL my %u peer_gseq %u\n",
con->peer_global_seq,
- le32_to_cpu(con->in_connect.global_seq));
+ le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.global_seq));
get_global_seq(con->msgr,
- le32_to_cpu(con->in_connect.global_seq));
+ le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.global_seq));
- ceph_con_out_kvec_reset(con);
+ con_out_kvec_reset(con);
ret = prepare_write_connect(con);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2012-05-22 1:45 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-05-22 3:58 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2012-05-22 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Eric Dumazet, David S. Miller, elder
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
> net/ceph/messenger.c between commit 95c961747284 ("net: cleanup unsigned
> to unsigned int") from Linus' tree and commit 57dac9d16209 ("ceph:
> messenger: use read_partial() in read_partial_message()") from the ceph
> tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
Thanks, Stephen! If there's an easier way to carry this in our tree, just
let me know.
sage
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc net/ceph/messenger.c
> index 36fa6bf,1a80907..0000000
> --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> @@@ -695,12 -698,12 +698,12 @@@ static void prepare_write_banner(struc
> set_bit(WRITE_PENDING, &con->state);
> }
>
> - static int prepare_write_connect(struct ceph_messenger *msgr,
> - struct ceph_connection *con,
> - int include_banner)
> + static int prepare_write_connect(struct ceph_connection *con)
> {
> - unsigned global_seq = get_global_seq(con->msgr, 0);
> + unsigned int global_seq = get_global_seq(con->msgr, 0);
> int proto;
> + int auth_proto;
> + struct ceph_auth_handshake *auth;
>
> switch (con->peer_name.type) {
> case CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_MON:
> @@@ -1627,9 -1663,10 +1663,10 @@@ static int read_partial_message_bio(str
> static int read_partial_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
> {
> struct ceph_msg *m = con->in_msg;
> + int size;
> + int end;
> int ret;
> - int to, left;
> - unsigned front_len, middle_len, data_len;
> + unsigned int front_len, middle_len, data_len;
> bool do_datacrc = !con->msgr->nocrc;
> int skip;
> u64 seq;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2012-05-22 1:45 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-22 3:58 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-05-22 1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Eric Dumazet, David S. Miller
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1562 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
net/ceph/messenger.c between commit 95c961747284 ("net: cleanup unsigned
to unsigned int") from Linus' tree and commit 57dac9d16209 ("ceph:
messenger: use read_partial() in read_partial_message()") from the ceph
tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc net/ceph/messenger.c
index 36fa6bf,1a80907..0000000
--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@@ -695,12 -698,12 +698,12 @@@ static void prepare_write_banner(struc
set_bit(WRITE_PENDING, &con->state);
}
- static int prepare_write_connect(struct ceph_messenger *msgr,
- struct ceph_connection *con,
- int include_banner)
+ static int prepare_write_connect(struct ceph_connection *con)
{
- unsigned global_seq = get_global_seq(con->msgr, 0);
+ unsigned int global_seq = get_global_seq(con->msgr, 0);
int proto;
+ int auth_proto;
+ struct ceph_auth_handshake *auth;
switch (con->peer_name.type) {
case CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_MON:
@@@ -1627,9 -1663,10 +1663,10 @@@ static int read_partial_message_bio(str
static int read_partial_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
{
struct ceph_msg *m = con->in_msg;
+ int size;
+ int end;
int ret;
- int to, left;
- unsigned front_len, middle_len, data_len;
+ unsigned int front_len, middle_len, data_len;
bool do_datacrc = !con->msgr->nocrc;
int skip;
u64 seq;
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2012-03-21 1:23 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-21 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Alex Elder
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2497 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/xattr.c between commit 83eb26af0db7 ("ceph: ensure prealloc_blob
is in place when removing xattr") from Linus' tree and commit
15226d16c19c ("ceph: make ceph_setxattr() and ceph_removexattr() more
alike") from the ceph tree.
I used the resolution provided by Alex (thanks) (see below) and I can
carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ceph/xattr.c
index a76f697,a3c1f9b..0000000
--- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
@@@ -816,11 -883,10 +883,11 @@@ static int ceph_send_removexattr(struc
int ceph_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name)
{
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
+ struct ceph_vxattr *vxattr;
struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
- struct ceph_vxattr_cb *vxattrs = ceph_inode_vxattrs(inode);
int issued;
int err;
+ int required_blob_size;
int dirty;
if (ceph_snap(inode) != CEPH_NOSNAP)
@@@ -829,42 -895,19 +896,39 @@@
if (!ceph_is_valid_xattr(name))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (vxattrs) {
- struct ceph_vxattr_cb *vxattr =
- ceph_match_vxattr(vxattrs, name);
- if (vxattr && vxattr->readonly)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
+ vxattr = ceph_match_vxattr(inode, name);
+ if (vxattr && vxattr->readonly)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ err = -ENOMEM;
spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
- __build_xattrs(inode);
+retry:
issued = __ceph_caps_issued(ci, NULL);
dout("removexattr %p issued %s\n", inode, ceph_cap_string(issued));
-
if (!(issued & CEPH_CAP_XATTR_EXCL))
goto do_sync;
+ __build_xattrs(inode);
+ required_blob_size = __get_required_blob_size(ci, 0, 0);
+
+ if (!ci->i_xattrs.prealloc_blob ||
+ required_blob_size > ci->i_xattrs.prealloc_blob->alloc_len) {
+ struct ceph_buffer *blob;
+
+ spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
+ dout(" preaallocating new blob size=%d\n", required_blob_size);
+ blob = ceph_buffer_new(required_blob_size, GFP_NOFS);
+ if (!blob)
+ goto out;
+ spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
+ if (ci->i_xattrs.prealloc_blob)
+ ceph_buffer_put(ci->i_xattrs.prealloc_blob);
+ ci->i_xattrs.prealloc_blob = blob;
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
err = __remove_xattr_by_name(ceph_inode(inode), name);
+
dirty = __ceph_mark_dirty_caps(ci, CEPH_CAP_XATTR_EXCL);
ci->i_xattrs.dirty = true;
inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2012-01-11 1:35 ` Sage Weil
2012-01-11 1:49 ` Al Viro
@ 2012-01-11 3:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-11 3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Al Viro, linux-next, linux-kernel, Alex Elder
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 337 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:35:36 -0800 (PST) Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> wrote:
>
> BTW, should I let Linus resolve this, or merge his master back into my
> tree, or rebase onto his master?
Let Linus resolve it (giving him a hint if necessary).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2012-01-11 1:31 ` Al Viro
2012-01-11 1:35 ` Sage Weil
@ 2012-01-11 2:10 ` Alex Elder
1 sibling, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Alex Elder @ 2012-01-11 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Sage Weil, linux-next, linux-kernel
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 01:31 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:27:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Sage,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
> > fs/ceph/super.c between commit 3c5184ef1216 ("ceph: d_alloc_root() may
> > fail") from Linus' tree and commit 26d913cdd955 ("ceph: always initialize
> > the dentry in open_root_dentry()") from the ceph tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>
> Ahem...
>
> > + root = d_obtain_alias(inode);
> > + }
> > + ceph_init_dentry(root);
>
> What will happen if dentry returned by d_obtain_alias() had already existed?
I had *exactly* the same reaction, and maybe the code would
have been a little less surprising if the null check were
in the caller (here) rather than in ceph_init_dentry().
-Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2012-01-11 1:35 ` Sage Weil
@ 2012-01-11 1:49 ` Al Viro
2012-01-11 3:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2012-01-11 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Alex Elder
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:35:36PM -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:27:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Sage,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
> > > fs/ceph/super.c between commit 3c5184ef1216 ("ceph: d_alloc_root() may
> > > fail") from Linus' tree and commit 26d913cdd955 ("ceph: always initialize
> > > the dentry in open_root_dentry()") from the ceph tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> >
> > Ahem...
> >
> > > + root = d_obtain_alias(inode);
> > > + }
> > > + ceph_init_dentry(root);
> >
> > What will happen if dentry returned by d_obtain_alias() had already existed?
>
> ceph_init_dentry() bails out immediately if d_fsdata is non-NULL.
Right.
> BTW, should I let Linus resolve this, or merge his master back into my
> tree, or rebase onto his master?
My fault - I should've checked your tree for conflicts and feed that fix to
you since it turned out to have them. I thought for some reason that ceph
pull had already happened...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2012-01-11 1:31 ` Al Viro
@ 2012-01-11 1:35 ` Sage Weil
2012-01-11 1:49 ` Al Viro
2012-01-11 3:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-11 2:10 ` Alex Elder
1 sibling, 2 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2012-01-11 1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Alex Elder
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:27:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Sage,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
> > fs/ceph/super.c between commit 3c5184ef1216 ("ceph: d_alloc_root() may
> > fail") from Linus' tree and commit 26d913cdd955 ("ceph: always initialize
> > the dentry in open_root_dentry()") from the ceph tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>
> Ahem...
>
> > + root = d_obtain_alias(inode);
> > + }
> > + ceph_init_dentry(root);
>
> What will happen if dentry returned by d_obtain_alias() had already existed?
ceph_init_dentry() bails out immediately if d_fsdata is non-NULL.
BTW, should I let Linus resolve this, or merge his master back into my
tree, or rebase onto his master?
sage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2012-01-11 1:27 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-01-11 1:31 ` Al Viro
2012-01-11 1:35 ` Sage Weil
2012-01-11 2:10 ` Alex Elder
0 siblings, 2 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2012-01-11 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Sage Weil, linux-next, linux-kernel, Alex Elder
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:27:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
> fs/ceph/super.c between commit 3c5184ef1216 ("ceph: d_alloc_root() may
> fail") from Linus' tree and commit 26d913cdd955 ("ceph: always initialize
> the dentry in open_root_dentry()") from the ceph tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Ahem...
> + root = d_obtain_alias(inode);
> + }
> + ceph_init_dentry(root);
What will happen if dentry returned by d_obtain_alias() had already existed?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2012-01-11 1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-11 1:31 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-11 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Alex Elder, Al Viro
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1473 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/super.c between commit 3c5184ef1216 ("ceph: d_alloc_root() may
fail") from Linus' tree and commit 26d913cdd955 ("ceph: always initialize
the dentry in open_root_dentry()") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ceph/super.c
index 48f61a1,ec74313..0000000
--- a/fs/ceph/super.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/super.c
@@@ -636,21 -636,14 +636,21 @@@ static struct dentry *open_root_dentry(
req->r_num_caps = 2;
err = ceph_mdsc_do_request(mdsc, NULL, req);
if (err == 0) {
+ struct inode *inode = req->r_target_inode;
+ req->r_target_inode = NULL;
dout("open_root_inode success\n");
- if (ceph_ino(req->r_target_inode) == CEPH_INO_ROOT &&
- fsc->sb->s_root == NULL)
- root = d_alloc_root(req->r_target_inode);
- else
- root = d_obtain_alias(req->r_target_inode);
+ if (ceph_ino(inode) == CEPH_INO_ROOT &&
+ fsc->sb->s_root == NULL) {
+ root = d_alloc_root(inode);
+ if (!root) {
+ iput(inode);
+ root = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ goto out;
+ }
- ceph_init_dentry(root);
+ } else {
+ root = d_obtain_alias(inode);
+ }
+ ceph_init_dentry(root);
- req->r_target_inode = NULL;
dout("open_root_inode success, root dentry is %p\n", root);
} else {
root = ERR_PTR(err);
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-12-15 0:14 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-12-15 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Herb Shiu
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/mds_client.c between commit
25933abdd8c562182ca6dc9f8c4c2cc8265c3a80 ("ceph: Handle file locks in
replies from the MDS") from Linus' tree and commit
cba1a66d511d46c426ea02c322293b48f3b88cf2 ("ceph: implement DIRLAYOUTHASH
feature to get dir layout from MDS") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (hopefully correctly, see below) and can carry this fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ceph/mds_client.c
index 38800ea,bb9ff98..0000000
--- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
@@@ -202,38 -212,6 +211,38 @@@ out_bad
}
/*
+ * parse fcntl F_GETLK results
+ */
+static int parse_reply_info_filelock(void **p, void *end,
+ struct ceph_mds_reply_info_parsed *info)
+{
+ if (*p + sizeof(*info->filelock_reply) > end)
+ goto bad;
+
+ info->filelock_reply = *p;
+ *p += sizeof(*info->filelock_reply);
+
+ if (unlikely(*p != end))
+ goto bad;
+ return 0;
+
+bad:
+ return -EIO;
+}
+
+/*
+ * parse extra results
+ */
+static int parse_reply_info_extra(void **p, void *end,
- struct ceph_mds_reply_info_parsed *info)
++ struct ceph_mds_reply_info_parsed *info, int features)
+{
+ if (info->head->op == CEPH_MDS_OP_GETFILELOCK)
+ return parse_reply_info_filelock(p, end, info);
+ else
- return parse_reply_info_dir(p, end, info);
++ return parse_reply_info_dir(p, end, info, features);
+}
+
+/*
* parse entire mds reply
*/
static int parse_reply_info(struct ceph_msg *msg,
@@@ -255,10 -234,10 +265,10 @@@
goto out_bad;
}
- /* dir content */
+ /* extra */
ceph_decode_32_safe(&p, end, len, bad);
if (len > 0) {
- err = parse_reply_info_extra(&p, p+len, info);
- err = parse_reply_info_dir(&p, p+len, info, features);
++ err = parse_reply_info_extra(&p, p+len, info, features);
if (err < 0)
goto out_bad;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2010-09-23 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-09-23 3:36 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2010-09-23 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
Thanks, Stephen.
I've rebased my for-next on the latest upstream (now that lock_flocks() is
in place), so these should all go away the next time around.
sage
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
> fs/ceph/Kconfig between commit be4f104dfd3b5e3ae262bff607965cfc38027dec
> ("ceph: select CRYPTO") from Linus' tree and commit
> 49dde0c8bee346a349862c4a3eddcd58e0d0ae90 ("ceph: factor out libceph from
> Ceph file system") from the ceph tree.
>
> Just overlapping additions. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the
> fix for a while. (though the adding of "default n" is, I think,
> redundant as that is the default anyway).
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc fs/ceph/Kconfig
> index 0fcd264,73a7b31..0000000
> --- a/fs/ceph/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ceph/Kconfig
> @@@ -1,9 -1,10 +1,11 @@@
> config CEPH_FS
> tristate "Ceph distributed file system (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> depends on INET && EXPERIMENTAL
> + select CEPH_LIB
> select LIBCRC32C
> select CRYPTO_AES
> + select CRYPTO
> + default n
> help
> Choose Y or M here to include support for mounting the
> experimental Ceph distributed file system. Ceph is an extremely
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-09-23 1:04 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-09-23 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Yehuda Sadeh
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 585 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/pagelist.c between commit
3d4401d9d0aef5c40706350685ddea3df6708496 ("ceph: fix pagelist kunmap
tail") from Linus' tree and commit
49dde0c8bee346a349862c4a3eddcd58e0d0ae90 ("ceph: factor out libceph from
Ceph file system") from the ceph tree.
The latter moved the file to net/ceph/pagelist.c, and the former patch
has been applied there, so I just removed the fs/ceph version of the file.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-09-23 0:56 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-09-23 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Greg Farnum
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/mds_client.c between commit
3612abbd5df6baa9ca3e0777c6c8646e202d3f66 ("ceph: fix reconnect encoding
for old servers") from Linus' tree and commit
20d5970378f075f8f567b92bd2c16373fbe09b72 ("ceph: preallocate flock state
without locks held") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix for a while.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ceph/mds_client.c
index fad95f8,9c648ed..0000000
--- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
@@@ -2361,21 -2365,35 +2365,37 @@@ static int encode_caps_cb(struct inode
if (recon_state->flock) {
int num_fcntl_locks, num_flock_locks;
-
- lock_kernel();
- ceph_count_locks(inode, &num_fcntl_locks, &num_flock_locks);
- rec.v2.flock_len = (2*sizeof(u32) +
- (num_fcntl_locks+num_flock_locks) *
- sizeof(struct ceph_filelock));
-
- err = ceph_pagelist_append(pagelist, &rec, reclen);
- if (!err)
- err = ceph_encode_locks(inode, pagelist,
- num_fcntl_locks,
- num_flock_locks);
- unlock_kernel();
+ struct ceph_pagelist_cursor trunc_point;
+
+ ceph_pagelist_set_cursor(pagelist, &trunc_point);
+ do {
+ lock_kernel();
+ ceph_count_locks(inode, &num_fcntl_locks,
+ &num_flock_locks);
+ rec.v2.flock_len = (2*sizeof(u32) +
+ (num_fcntl_locks+num_flock_locks) *
+ sizeof(struct ceph_filelock));
+ unlock_kernel();
+
+ /* pre-alloc pagelist */
+ ceph_pagelist_truncate(pagelist, &trunc_point);
+ err = ceph_pagelist_append(pagelist, &rec, reclen);
+ if (!err)
+ err = ceph_pagelist_reserve(pagelist,
+ rec.v2.flock_len);
+
+ /* encode locks */
+ if (!err) {
+ lock_kernel();
+ err = ceph_encode_locks(inode,
+ pagelist,
+ num_fcntl_locks,
+ num_flock_locks);
+ unlock_kernel();
+ }
+ } while (err == -ENOSPC);
+ } else {
+ err = ceph_pagelist_append(pagelist, &rec, reclen);
}
out_free:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-09-23 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-23 3:36 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-09-23 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/Kconfig between commit be4f104dfd3b5e3ae262bff607965cfc38027dec
("ceph: select CRYPTO") from Linus' tree and commit
49dde0c8bee346a349862c4a3eddcd58e0d0ae90 ("ceph: factor out libceph from
Ceph file system") from the ceph tree.
Just overlapping additions. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the
fix for a while. (though the adding of "default n" is, I think,
redundant as that is the default anyway).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ceph/Kconfig
index 0fcd264,73a7b31..0000000
--- a/fs/ceph/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/ceph/Kconfig
@@@ -1,9 -1,10 +1,11 @@@
config CEPH_FS
tristate "Ceph distributed file system (EXPERIMENTAL)"
depends on INET && EXPERIMENTAL
+ select CEPH_LIB
select LIBCRC32C
select CRYPTO_AES
+ select CRYPTO
+ default n
help
Choose Y or M here to include support for mounting the
experimental Ceph distributed file system. Ceph is an extremely
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-08-13 0:28 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-08-13 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Wang Lei, David Howells, Steve French
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in net/Makefile
between commit 1a4240f4764ac78adbf4b0ebb49b3bd8c72ffa11 ("DNS: Separate
out CIFS DNS Resolver code") from Linus' tree and commit
28419a6b287727e879aa94f2f8662a3810d14182 ("ceph: factor out libceph from
Ceph file system") from the ceph tree.
Just overlapping additions. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the
fix for a while.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc net/Makefile
index ea60fbc,873c2ae..0000000
--- a/net/Makefile
+++ b/net/Makefile
@@@ -67,4 -67,4 +67,5 @@@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_NET),y
obj-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += sysctl_net.o
endif
obj-$(CONFIG_WIMAX) += wimax/
+obj-$(CONFIG_DNS_RESOLVER) += dns_resolver/
+ obj-$(CONFIG_CEPH_LIB) += ceph/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2010-05-14 4:25 ` Sage Weil
@ 2010-05-14 6:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-05-14 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Cheng Renquan
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 393 bytes --]
Hi Sage,
On Thu, 13 May 2010 21:25:45 -0700 (PDT) Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> wrote:
>
> Aie, sorry... I rebased everything queued for the next window yesterday
> but forgot to update the for-next tag. These conflicts should all
> disappear next time around.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
2010-05-14 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-05-14 4:25 ` Sage Weil
2010-05-14 6:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2010-05-14 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Cheng Renquan
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, 14 May 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
> fs/ceph/super.c between commit 5dfc589a8467470226feccdc50f1b32713318e7b
> ("ceph: unregister bdi before kill_anon_super releases device name") from
> Linus' tree and commits 9f2a2a1faa0fd990d4930605583a67d7dff28bff ("ceph:
> use ceph_sb_to_client instead of ceph_client") and
> c72b09ba224e6f2c00bcf810a0a62059fcf405f7 ("ceph: name bdi ceph-%d instead
> of major:minor") from the ceph tree.
Aie, sorry... I rebased everything queued for the next window yesterday
but forgot to update the for-next tag. These conflicts should all
disappear next time around.
Thanks!
sage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-05-14 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-05-14 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/messenger.c between commit
45c6ceb547ad2d98215351974a4686bf8cb13e14 ("ceph: zero unused message
header, footer fields") from Linus' tree and commit
c46c4a323cad3fb2678a6b9ffd200b7640b0dc61 ("ceph: simplify ceph_msg_new")
from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix for a while.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ceph/messenger.c
index cd4fadb,402d9ee..0000000
--- a/fs/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/messenger.c
@@@ -1406,15 -1380,12 +1408,13 @@@ static int read_partial_message(struct
con->in_base_pos = -front_len - middle_len - data_len -
sizeof(m->footer);
con->in_tag = CEPH_MSGR_TAG_READY;
+ con->in_seq++;
return 0;
}
- if (IS_ERR(con->in_msg)) {
- ret = PTR_ERR(con->in_msg);
- con->in_msg = NULL;
+ if (!con->in_msg) {
con->error_msg =
"error allocating memory for incoming message";
- return ret;
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
m = con->in_msg;
m->front.iov_len = 0; /* haven't read it yet */
@@@ -2094,15 -2061,12 +2093,15 @@@ struct ceph_msg *ceph_msg_new(int type
kref_init(&m->kref);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&m->list_head);
+ m->hdr.tid = 0;
m->hdr.type = cpu_to_le16(type);
+ m->hdr.priority = cpu_to_le16(CEPH_MSG_PRIO_DEFAULT);
+ m->hdr.version = 0;
m->hdr.front_len = cpu_to_le32(front_len);
m->hdr.middle_len = 0;
- m->hdr.data_len = cpu_to_le32(page_len);
- m->hdr.data_off = cpu_to_le16(page_off);
+ m->hdr.data_len = 0;
+ m->hdr.data_off = 0;
- m->hdr.priority = cpu_to_le16(CEPH_MSG_PRIO_DEFAULT);
+ m->hdr.reserved = 0;
m->footer.front_crc = 0;
m->footer.middle_crc = 0;
m->footer.data_crc = 0;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-05-14 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-05-14 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Cheng Renquan
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/caps.c between commit f818a73674c5d197f66b636a46d7d578d7258129
("ceph: fix cap removal races") from Linus' tree and commit
9f2a2a1faa0fd990d4930605583a67d7dff28bff ("ceph: use ceph_sb_to_client
instead of ceph_client") from the ceph tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix
for a while.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ceph/caps.c
index d940053,1747db0..0000000
--- a/fs/ceph/caps.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c
@@@ -867,8 -864,8 +867,9 @@@ void __ceph_remove_cap(struct ceph_cap
{
struct ceph_mds_session *session = cap->session;
struct ceph_inode_info *ci = cap->ci;
- struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc = &ceph_client(ci->vfs_inode.i_sb)->mdsc;
+ struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc =
+ &ceph_sb_to_client(ci->vfs_inode.i_sb)->mdsc;
+ int removed = 0;
dout("__ceph_remove_cap %p from %p\n", cap, &ci->vfs_inode);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-05-14 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-14 4:25 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-05-14 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Cheng Renquan
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
fs/ceph/super.c between commit 5dfc589a8467470226feccdc50f1b32713318e7b
("ceph: unregister bdi before kill_anon_super releases device name") from
Linus' tree and commits 9f2a2a1faa0fd990d4930605583a67d7dff28bff ("ceph:
use ceph_sb_to_client instead of ceph_client") and
c72b09ba224e6f2c00bcf810a0a62059fcf405f7 ("ceph: name bdi ceph-%d instead
of major:minor") from the ceph tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for a while.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/ceph/super.c
index 110857b,30fa891..0000000
--- a/fs/ceph/super.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/super.c
@@@ -8,14 -8,10 +8,11 @@@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/parser.h>
- #include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/statfs.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
- #include <linux/version.h>
- #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include "decode.h"
#include "super.h"
@@@ -893,9 -910,8 +921,10 @@@ static int ceph_register_bdi(struct sup
client->backing_dev_info.ra_pages =
(client->mount_args->rsize + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1)
>> PAGE_SHIFT;
- err = bdi_register_dev(&client->backing_dev_info, sb->s_dev);
+ err = bdi_register(&client->backing_dev_info, NULL, "ceph-%d",
+ atomic_long_inc_return(&bdi_seq));
+ if (!err)
+ sb->s_bdi = &client->backing_dev_info;
return err;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
* linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
@ 2010-01-12 0:09 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-01-12 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Randy Dunlap
Hi Sage,
Today's linux-next merge of the ceph tree got a conflict in
Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt between commit
cb5a8b2c92febbed57126e1b8416dfd7607ff03d ("docs: large update to
ioctl-number.txt") from Linus' tree and commit
8f4e91dee2a245e4be6942f4a8d83a769e13a47d ("ceph: ioctls") from the ceph
tree.
Just overlapping additions - not a big deal. I fixed it up (see below)
and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
diff --cc Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt
index 35cf64d,91cfdd7..0000000
--- a/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt
+++ b/Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt
@@@ -289,9 -181,8 +289,10 @@@ Code Seq#(hex) Include File Comment
0x8C 00-3F WiNRADiO driver
<http://www.proximity.com.au/~brian/winradio/>
0x90 00 drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.h
+0x92 00-0F drivers/usb/mon/mon_bin.c
0x93 60-7F linux/auto_fs.h
+0x94 all fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
+ 0x97 00-7F fs/ceph/ioctl.h Ceph file system
0x99 00-0F 537-Addinboard driver
<mailto:buk@buks.ipn.de>
0xA0 all linux/sdp/sdp.h Industrial Device Project
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-10 3:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-04-18 1:34 linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-10 1:24 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-10 3:57 ` Sage Weil
2013-06-19 1:22 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-31 1:58 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-21 23:16 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-22 1:45 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-22 3:58 ` Sage Weil
2012-03-21 1:23 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-11 1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-11 1:31 ` Al Viro
2012-01-11 1:35 ` Sage Weil
2012-01-11 1:49 ` Al Viro
2012-01-11 3:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-11 2:10 ` Alex Elder
2010-12-15 0:14 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-23 1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-23 0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-23 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-23 3:36 ` Sage Weil
2010-08-13 0:28 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-14 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-14 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-14 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-14 4:25 ` Sage Weil
2010-05-14 6:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-12 0:09 Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).