linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	nanditad@google.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:41:42 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130422.204142.498231678158708544.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130422130324.43b4521c6b4719ed7a96ef00@canb.auug.org.au>

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:03:24 +1000

> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c between commit 12fb3dd9dc3c ("tcp: call
> tcp_replace_ts_recent() from tcp_ack()") from Linus' tree and commit
> 9b717a8d2450 ("tcp: TLP loss detection") from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

I took care of this during the net --> net-next merge, thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-23  0:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-22  3:03 linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-23  0:41 ` David Miller [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-14 23:52 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-16 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-16 23:18 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-27 23:28 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-28  6:53 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-09-21  1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-21  4:40 ` Colin Foster
2022-07-15  2:01 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-15  1:48 Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-23  2:32 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-29  0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-29  0:48 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-29  0:43 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-21  0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-15 20:31 Mark Brown
2019-09-15 20:24 Mark Brown
2019-06-17  1:44 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-04  0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-04  0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-02 22:56 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-20  1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-06  4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-04 22:59 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-09 23:31 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-10  4:37 ` Cong Wang
2017-11-10  4:39 ` David Miller
2017-10-30 17:24 Mark Brown
2017-10-30 17:08 Mark Brown
2017-10-30 17:02 Mark Brown
2017-10-30 17:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-30 18:10   ` Mark Brown
2017-06-30  0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-03  1:07 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-03  4:08 ` David Miller
2017-03-24  0:05 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-24  0:10 ` David Miller
2017-03-24  1:24   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-02-02  1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-02  8:40 ` Yotam Gigi
2016-10-02 22:37 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-02 22:32 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-30  1:01 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-03  3:15 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-15  0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-15  8:53 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-14  1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-14  8:23 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-05-28  4:17 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-28 13:34 ` Tom Lendacky
2015-02-12  1:05 Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-12  2:01 Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-05  3:13 Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-05  3:26 ` KY Srinivasan
2013-12-18  1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-18  1:56 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-12-18  2:19   ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-05  5:23 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-05  5:19 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-05  7:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-09-02  3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17  2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17  2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-22  3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-23  0:42 ` David Miller
2013-04-22  2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-22  2:43 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-23  0:41 ` David Miller
2013-03-27  0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-27  4:54 ` David Miller
2013-03-12  0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-12 10:49 ` David Miller
2012-11-08 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-10 23:34 ` David Miller
2012-10-02  1:51 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-26  1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-19  1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-19  1:18 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-02-27  1:11 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-27  4:05 ` David Miller
2012-02-29  3:21   ` Ben Hutchings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130422.204142.498231678158708544.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nanditad@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).