From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Yann E. MORIN" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1 (media/usb/stk1160) Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 21:28:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20130501192845.GA18811@free.fr> References: <20130501183734.7ad1efca2d06e75432edabbd@canb.auug.org.au> <518157EB.3010700@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <518157EB.3010700@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/01/13 01:37, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included > > branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. > > > > Changes since 20130430: > > > > > When CONFIG_SND=m and CONFIG_SND_AC97_CODEC=m and > CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160=y > CONFIG_VIDEO_STK1160_AC97=y > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register': > (.text+0x122706): undefined reference to `snd_card_create' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register': > (.text+0x1227b2): undefined reference to `snd_ac97_bus' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register': > (.text+0x1227cd): undefined reference to `snd_card_free' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register': > (.text+0x12281b): undefined reference to `snd_ac97_mixer' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_register': > (.text+0x122832): undefined reference to `snd_card_register' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `stk1160_ac97_unregister': > (.text+0x12285e): undefined reference to `snd_card_free' > > > This kconfig fragment: > config VIDEO_STK1160_AC97 > bool "STK1160 AC97 codec support" > depends on VIDEO_STK1160 && SND > select SND_AC97_CODEC > > is unreliable (doesn't do what some people expect) when SND=m and SND_AC97_CODEC=m, > since VIDEO_STK1160_AC97 is a bool. I'm not sure to understand what you want, here. I find it valid that a 'bool' can 'select' a 'tristate', to force it to 'y'. Do you mean there is an issue with Kconfig, the parser? -> should Kconfig warn or error out in such a case? Or do you mean the structure above is wrong, and should be ammended? -> change the 'select' to a 'depends on'? -> change the symbol to a tristate? Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'