From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: comment on the xen-two tree
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:48:18 -0400
Message-ID: <20130513134818.GN6811@phenom.dumpdata.com>
References: <20130513095244.60176cad5e302c1156788096@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130513095244.60176cad5e302c1156788096@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:52:44AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> Since the xen-two tree
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git
> linux-next) seems to only consist of merges commits and some old (pre
> v3.9) stuff, it might be a good time to reset it to be just v3.10-rc1 (or
> rebase onto that) so you can start with a nice clean tree again.

Done!

> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au