From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget tree with the usb.current tree Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:50:05 +0300 Message-ID: <20130730055005.GC9155@radagast> References: <20130730140810.a61155d064e33248faef323b@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130730140810.a61155d064e33248faef323b@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Felipe Balbi , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rong Wang , Greg KH List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:08:10PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Felipe, >=20 > Today's linux-next merge of the usb-gadget tree got a conflict in > drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c between commit 1894870eb424 ("usb: gadget: > udc-core: fix the typo of udc state attribute") from the usb.current tree > and commit 5702f75375aa ("usb: gadget: udc-core: move sysfs_notify() to a > workqueue") from the usb-gadget tree. >=20 > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). >=20 > --=20 > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au >=20 > diff --cc drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c > index 13e25f8,3122ab9..0000000 > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc-core.c > @@@ -105,6 -106,13 +106,13 @@@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_gadget_unmap_requ > =20 > /* --------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- */ > =20 > + static void usb_gadget_state_work(struct work_struct *work) > + { > + struct usb_gadget *gadget =3D work_to_gadget(work); > +=20 > - sysfs_notify(&gadget->dev.kobj, NULL, "status"); > ++ sysfs_notify(&gadget->dev.kobj, NULL, "state"); > + } this is the same fix used in my master branch, looks good. :-) Thanks --=20 balbi --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR91QNAAoJEIaOsuA1yqREROkQAKnC1pyaFkwCtAyDP9quNUR1 dHyR22skd2ArROXm3X2uIjUnLDflKsKOx655T0Xpy5pMBTLccBf8/4GZUUwIdY/Y QUpSPqFETl8hDV7tbXETBeHTmy/gjuivMD+30QFNLeU1tD59KCYb19+KJDndLCW2 1deIMu/J1eoKwoKrWjpkj94LfeVc6Nv+6dBfB5rU/4aNbOfPHqEk5fXm9DqFueEn RWmTVQPiaO8PjH02RBvQUtR18RH8JSilVyIP2b8UPlvzcrZ0nmIal+70ynb0g4lW Y6I9S5+mh/jl4B1xgBRefEDH89T5+yWErJRL+3iSgDMWmqARdQOXmqRSIqerbJHp qe6VWsj2FwjcU3tveC9AJYs0G7fzPLLuTW45Nar6TGbtnIYOCtG4FCbQ1t3WEB8b pUkL1CLluNKteWdv/ao4ZxPCI7hir4TlgaARH0QYqe5ttN4sm3O4INe+YZAxCszJ wbFDeomrb6AXUs9USY18YRzAq8cKh2TZeB2O7Ii/yFnD13bbxXDugcagbzvMWelA FlbKi9B8i+WIJ2hn+oWRqAaySWW5StsqcECjTfIr046DbnV9/fkZlUOXIUDACNfN Ecqkqjxt4NAwpLja6RpCi95AfADNPG+MNonJqK6f3RksMVhTgUW+8klzbTc3HMTc Z+pgaP2tmfZTrFXyXfQJ =Vx7L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL--