From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:59:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20130910225934.GF13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20130910143807.4c32d548e08d2184061f52cb@canb.auug.org.au> <20130910152753.662599171456233c5f91edb4@linux-foundation.org> <20130910222924.GB13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130910153520.14e49cd32feb16d45eb8abac@linux-foundation.org> <20130910223624.GC13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20130910154116.cc4afe048213a779040ea3cc@linux-foundation.org> <20130910224823.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:59359 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751230Ab3IJW7m (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:59:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130910224823.GE13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Dave Chinner , Glauber Costa On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:41:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Obtained from where? There are a whole pile of fixes resulting from > > review and linux-next testing. Are they included? > > -next and yes. The trivial ones - folded into the commits they are fixing > (I mean, ones directly following the commit being fixed). The rest included > as individual commits. > > I'm looking through the DCACHE_LRU_LIST mess right now... It's not that bad, actually; I think the variant I've pushed right now (vfs.git#for-next, head at f5e1dd34561e0fb06400b378d595198918833021) should be doing the right thing. It ought to cover everything in your branch in -next from "fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long" on to the end of queue.