From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Padovan Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with the wireless tree Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 12:08:54 -0300 Message-ID: <20130927150854.GA13211@joana> References: <20130927132644.3aca01f917f0bf569a0a6942@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qe0-f43.google.com ([209.85.128.43]:52163 "EHLO mail-qe0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752398Ab3I0PJA (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:09:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130927132644.3aca01f917f0bf569a0a6942@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hedberg , "John W. Linville" , Marcel Holtmann Hi Stephen, 2013-09-27 Stephen Rothwell : > Hi Gustavo, > > Today's linux-next merge of the bluetooth tree got a conflict in > net/bluetooth/hci_core.c between commit 5e130367d43f ("Bluetooth: > Introduce a new HCI_RFKILLED flag") from the wireless tree and commit > 0736cfa8e5bb ("Bluetooth: Introduce user channel flag for HCI devices") > from the bluetooth tree. Thanks for reporting, I knew about it about but didn't had any time to fix it yesterday. I just merged bluetooth.git on bluetooth-next.git and fixed this. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). > > P.S. that closing brace is badly indented :-( Yeah, it is now fixed on bluetooth-next at least. Gustavo