From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Horman Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:08:18 -0400 Message-ID: <20131018130818.GA4019@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <20131018125814.GL2443@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:37756 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753295Ab3JRNIe (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:08:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131018125814.GL2443@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Brown Cc: Vlad Yasevich , "David S. Miller" , Joe Perches , Thierry Reding , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 01:58:14PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the next-next tree got a conflict in > include/net/dst.h between e87b3998d (net: dst: provide accessor function > to dst->xfrm) in the net tree and a4023dd01 (dst.h: Remove extern from > function prototypes) in net-next. > > I've fixed up as below and can carry as required. > > diff --cc include/net/dst.h > index 3c4c944,211dcf1..0000000 > --- a/include/net/dst.h > +++ b/include/net/dst.h > @@@ -479,22 -478,10 +478,22 @@@ static inline struct dst_entry *xfrm_lo > { > return dst_orig; > } > + > +static inline struct xfrm_state *dst_xfrm(const struct dst_entry *dst) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > + > #else > - extern struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig, > - const struct flowi *fl, struct sock *sk, > - int flags); > + struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig, > + const struct flowi *fl, struct sock *sk, > + int flags); > + > +/* skb attached with this dst needs transformation if dst->xfrm is valid */ > +static inline struct xfrm_state *dst_xfrm(const struct dst_entry *dst) > +{ > + return dst->xfrm; > +} > #endif > > #endif /* _NET_DST_H */ Looks correct to me. Thanks! Neil