From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:01:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20131025210130.GA31451@roeck-us.net> References: <1382713426-2680-1-git-send-email-treding@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:48914 "EHLO mail-pa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755364Ab3JYVBi (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:01:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1382713426-2680-1-git-send-email-treding@nvidia.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:03:45PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > Hi all, > > I've uploaded today's linux-next tree to the master branch of the > repository below: > > git://gitorious.org/thierryreding/linux-next.git > > A next-20131025 tag is also provided for convenience. > > One new trivial conflicts and a new build failure caused by an incorrect > use of the genpool allocator. > > Upon a request from Olof Johansson I've only included fixes for build > breakage as a result of interactions between the various trees. But > since I've fixed many of the other build failures already, I've pushed > those to a separate tag (next-20131025-fixes). That builds fine on x86 > 32-bit and 64-bit allmodconfigs as well as ARM and x86 default > configurations. Most of the PowerPC build errors have also been fixed. > Hi Thierry, You are making a good point for your previous approach, but maybe it is necessary to show people the real status of the -next tree. total: 110 pass: 4 skipped: 4 fail: 102 All ten qemu tests fail as well, though I didn't check if all are build failures or if there are some runtime failures. This is with " v3.12-rc5-8053-g9e11bce". Guenter