From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:40:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131026084033.GA14237@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131025132553.GE9999@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
* Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:03:42PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in
> >
> > tools/perf/config/Makefile
> > tools/perf/config/feature-tests.mak
> >
> > caused by commits 405ffbd (perf tools: Check libunwind for availability of
> > dwarf parsing feature) and mostly 308e1e7 (tools/perf/build: Clean up the
> > libunwind logic in config/Makefile) as well as various follow-up patches.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below). Please verify that the resolution looks good.
> > Also note that this isn't really a trivial resolution of a conflict, but
> > required modifying various other files. That causes rerere magic not to
> > work and needs part of conflict to be resolved manually. Perhaps a good
> > idea would be to rebase Jean's patch on top of the cleanups going on in
> > the tip tree? Perhaps even carry the patch in the tip tree?
>
> These came via my tree (arm perf) after discussion here:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/203077.html
>
> Now that they've been pulled by rmk, we can't back them out with
> ugly reverts, so I'm not sure what we can do to resolve in the ARM
> tree; it looks like the perf Makefile has changed significantly in
> -tip.
I realize that it was acked by Arnaldo, but for workflow reasons I'd
really prefer it if non-trivial perf tooling patches went to Arnaldo
as a pull request so that he can resolve any such conflicts. perf is
in constant development so it's less work for you that way.
(Kernel side changes can go that route as well, as long as they are
perf related.)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-26 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-24 16:31 linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 Thierry Reding
2013-10-24 20:02 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 (xilinx_uartps) Randy Dunlap
2013-10-25 5:02 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 24 Guenter Roeck
2013-10-25 8:35 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:16 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-25 13:24 ` Mark Brown
2013-10-25 13:33 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-25 15:45 ` Mark Brown
2013-10-25 13:35 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:43 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-25 14:17 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 15:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-25 15:17 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 17:17 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-25 18:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-10-25 13:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the c6x tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the h8300-remove tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:35 ` Mark Salter
2013-10-25 15:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-25 13:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the mfd-lj tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:25 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-26 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-10-26 14:01 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-27 7:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-10-27 10:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-28 7:47 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-28 8:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-25 13:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-10-25 13:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 13:22 ` linux-next: manual merge of the c6x tree Mark Salter
2013-10-25 13:36 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-26 13:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-28 7:34 ` Thierry Reding
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-17 21:23 linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree Mark Brown
2013-10-17 21:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-16 18:51 linux-next: Tree for Oct 16 Thierry Reding
2013-10-16 18:51 ` linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-16 20:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 20:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 20:31 ` NeilBrown
2013-10-16 20:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 20:51 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-16 21:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-16 20:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 1:28 ` NeilBrown
2013-10-17 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-22 2:09 ` NeilBrown
2013-10-16 20:40 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-16 20:44 ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-16 21:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-10-17 1:29 ` NeilBrown
2013-09-30 11:26 linux-next: manual merge of the bcon tree Thierry Reding
2013-09-30 11:26 ` linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131026084033.GA14237@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).