linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 17:59:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131026165937.GA6362@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526AF150.1030004@infradead.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 470 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:31:44PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> That's unfortunate.  The fixes should be part of the tree IMO.

What Stephen does (which does seem like a good policy) is to keep the
tree at the previous day's version instead of taking a new version if it
introduces breakages on the architectures he tests.  That seems to
strike a good balance between keeping things working for users and
providing pushback to get things fixed before they go to Linus.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-26 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-25 15:03 linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 15:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the block tree Thierry Reding
2013-10-25 19:46 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (powercap_sys.c) Randy Dunlap
2013-10-25 22:17   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-10-25 22:30     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-10-25 21:01 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 Guenter Roeck
2013-10-25 21:12 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (of_gpio.h) Randy Dunlap
2013-10-25 22:31 ` linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 Randy Dunlap
2013-10-26 16:59   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2013-10-28  8:01   ` Thierry Reding
2013-10-28 16:53     ` Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-25  5:37 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-25  4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-25  9:49 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-25 22:11 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-26  1:28   ` Ming Lei
2021-10-26  8:40     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2021-10-27 11:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-27 12:54   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-10-28  1:51   ` Xianting Tian
2021-10-28  4:51     ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-28  7:59       ` Xianting Tian
2021-10-28 12:48         ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-28 12:54           ` Xianting Tian
2019-10-25  5:45 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-25  3:31 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-26  1:09 ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-10-27  6:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2012-10-25  4:01 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-25  9:36 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-25  9:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-25 10:42 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131026165937.GA6362@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).