From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the imx-mxs tree Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:17:41 +0800 Message-ID: <20131104131739.GC24970@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <20131104152739.92ae486e7d418221c6a48a1e@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from co9ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.27]:37463 "EHLO co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751782Ab3KDNRL (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:17:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131104152739.92ae486e7d418221c6a48a1e@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Rob Herring , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rostislav Lisovy , Silvio F On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 03:27:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Today's linux-next merge of the dt-rh tree got a conflict in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt between commit > 064d7f6c985a ("ARM: dts: Add vendor prefix for Voipac Technologies > s.r.o") from the imx-mxs tree and commit d6c3073e7fb5 ("DT: sort > vendor-prefixes.txt") from the dt-rh tree. Hi Rob, Would you like to apply the patch "ARM: dts: Add vendor prefix for Voipac Technologies s.r.o" on your tree, so that we can save this conflict? If so, I will drop the patch from my tree. Just let me know. Shawn