linux-next: manual merge of the jdelvare-hwmon tree with Linus' tree

linux-next: manual merge of the jdelvare-hwmon tree with Linus' tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 449 bytes --]

Hi Jean,

Today's linux-next merge of the jdelvare-hwmon tree got a conflict in
drivers/hwmon/lm90.c between commits from Linus' tree and commits from
the jdelvare-hwmon tree.

It looks like the jdelvare-hwmon patch series has been reset back
(unintentionally?) to stuff that has already been merged into Linus'
tree ... so I just used the version from Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jdelvare-hwmon tree with Linus' tree

[Jean Delvare]

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:57:33 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the jdelvare-hwmon tree got a conflict in
> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c between commits from Linus' tree and commits from
> the jdelvare-hwmon tree.
> 
> It looks like the jdelvare-hwmon patch series has been reset back
> (unintentionally?) to stuff that has already been merged into Linus'
> tree ... so I just used the version from Linus' tree.

Oops. Yes, that was totally unintentional.

I had my ISP change some settings for my web hosting, and all my data
was deleted in the process. I kind of expected that, so I made a
complete backup before asking for the change. Unfortunately I did not
expect them to take so long to acknowledge my request and act upon it,
so when I restored my backup, my web space indeed went back in time by
several weeks.

I manually updated everything I remembered having touched during that
time frame, but as you spotted rightly, I forgot my kernel patch series.

This is all fixed now, sorry for the noise and thanks for letting me
know.

-- 
Jean Delvare

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jdelvare-hwmon tree with Linus' tree

[Jean Delvare]

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:42:57 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the jdelvare-hwmon tree got a conflict in
> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c between commit
> 0bf41d9f414a5cf558aff234a0ff486257537574 ("drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c:
> enable the Intel Atom") from Linus' tree and commit
> af663ff4d88e09c4e45661251e3c1eeff147ffc1 ("hwmon: (coretemp) Add support
> for Atom CPUs") from the jdelvare-hwmon tree.
> 
> I used the version from the jdelvare-hwmon for today.

Thanks for the heads up. Apparently someone managed to sneak in broken
Atom support into coretemp, while I have a working version in my hwmon
tree, which I intend to push to Linus today. I'll rebase my patch on
upstream so that it applies again, and I'll send it quickly.

-- 
Jean Delvare

linux-next: manual merge of the jdelvare-hwmon tree with Linus' tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 532 bytes --]

Hi Jean,

Today's linux-next merge of the jdelvare-hwmon tree got a conflict in
drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c between commit
0bf41d9f414a5cf558aff234a0ff486257537574 ("drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c:
enable the Intel Atom") from Linus' tree and commit
af663ff4d88e09c4e45661251e3c1eeff147ffc1 ("hwmon: (coretemp) Add support
for Atom CPUs") from the jdelvare-hwmon tree.

I used the version from the jdelvare-hwmon for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]