From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:06:55 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20131218.120655.881363015739010955.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20131217.213033.1019416869378407851.davem@davemloft.net>
	<CAMuHMdUi4GQYR2p7enikEkTq1s-5YwirTzmo_tS0JwiE=dVmYw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20131218101523.GP13532@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131218101523.GP13532@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ffusco@redhat.com, dborkman@redhat.com, tgraf@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:15:23 +0100

> So unless there's a sane and easy way to keep it sorted; I'm going to
> ignore that rule.

Me too, it's unreasonable and of dubious value.