linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2014-01-05 23:20 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-01-05 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Christian Daudt, ebastian Hesselbarth

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1454 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commit 753d12434da3 ("ARM: 7932/1: bcm:
Add DEBUG_LL console support") from the arm tree and commit caad0b41de69
("ARM: add Marvell Berlin UART0 lowlevel debug") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
index 9afabbb5e798,bda94e46e8d6..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
@@@ -106,17 -94,14 +106,25 @@@ choic
  		depends on ARCH_BCM2835
  		select DEBUG_UART_PL01X
  
 +	config DEBUG_BCM_KONA_UART
 +		bool "Kernel low-level debugging messages via BCM KONA UART"
 +		depends on ARCH_BCM
 +		select DEBUG_UART_8250
 +		help
 +		  Say Y here if you want kernel low-level debugging support
 +		  on Broadcom SoC platforms.
 +		  This low level debug works for Broadcom
 +		  mobile SoCs in the Kona family of chips (e.g. bcm28155,
 +		  bcm11351, etc...)
 +
+ 	config DEBUG_BERLIN_UART
+ 		bool "Marvell Berlin SoC Debug UART"
+ 		depends on ARCH_BERLIN
+ 		select DEBUG_UART_8250
+ 		help
+ 		  Say Y here if you want kernel low-level debugging support
+ 		  on Marvell Berlin SoC based platforms.
+ 
  	config DEBUG_CLPS711X_UART1
  		bool "Kernel low-level debugging messages via UART1"
  		depends on ARCH_CLPS711X

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2022-02-28  0:16 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2022-02-28  0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Russell King
  Cc: Ard Biesheuvel, Linus Walleij, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1213 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/Kconfig

between commit:

  54f481a2308e ("ARM: remove old-style irq entry")

from the arm tree and commit:

  00ba9357d189 ("ARM: ixp4xx: Drop custom DMA coherency and bouncing")

from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig
index 72150cb8db02,d9142ad18c52..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@@ -389,10 -379,10 +386,9 @@@ config ARCH_IOP32
  config ARCH_IXP4XX
  	bool "IXP4xx-based"
  	depends on MMU
- 	select ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK
  	select ARCH_SUPPORTS_BIG_ENDIAN
+ 	select ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
  	select CPU_XSCALE
- 	select DMABOUNCE if PCI
 -	select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
  	select GPIO_IXP4XX
  	select GPIOLIB
  	select HAVE_PCI

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2021-02-14 22:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
  2021-02-20 19:45   ` Alain Volmat
@ 2021-02-21 22:03   ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-02-21 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ARM, Russell King
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, Alain VOLMAT,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4334 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:14:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:01:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > 
> > between commits:
> > 
> >   9ca4efec0aba ("ARM: 9040/1: use DEBUG_UART_PHYS and DEBUG_UART_VIRT for sti LL_UART")
> >   6e959ad8bb90 ("ARM: 9041/1: sti LL_UART: add STiH418 SBC UART0 support")
> > 
> > from the arm tree and commits:
> > 
> >   f3a732843acc ("ARM: remove sirf prima2/atlas platforms")
> >   89d4f98ae90d ("ARM: remove zte zx platform")
> > 
> > from the arm-soc tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > index 7a8697a97c98,c36c5d4c6e9c..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > @@@ -1623,10 -1546,7 +1550,9 @@@ config DEBUG_LL_INCLUD
> >   	default "debug/renesas-scif.S" if DEBUG_RMOBILE_SCIFA4
> >   	default "debug/s3c24xx.S" if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART
> >   	default "debug/s5pv210.S" if DEBUG_S5PV210_UART
> > - 	default "debug/sirf.S" if DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART
> >  -	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STI_UART
> >  +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2
> >  +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1
> >  +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
> >   	default "debug/stm32.S" if DEBUG_STM32_UART
> >   	default "debug/tegra.S" if DEBUG_TEGRA_UART
> >   	default "debug/ux500.S" if DEBUG_UX500_UART
> > @@@ -1659,8 -1579,6 +1585,7 @@@ config DEBUG_UART_PHY
> >   	default 0x02531000 if DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART1
> >   	default 0x03010fe0 if ARCH_RPC
> >   	default 0x07000000 if DEBUG_SUN9I_UART0
> > - 	default 0x09405000 if DEBUG_ZTE_ZX
> >  +	default 0x09530000 if DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
> >   	default 0x10009000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_STD_PORT || \
> >   				DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CA9
> >   	default 0x1010c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
> > @@@ -1789,10 -1698,8 +1707,10 @@@
> >   		DEBUG_RMOBILE_SCIFA4 || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
> >   		DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART || \
> >   		DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART || \
> > - 		DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART || DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> > + 		DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> >  -		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART
> >  +		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART || \
> >  +		DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2 || DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1 || \
> >  +		DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
> >   
> >   config DEBUG_UART_VIRT
> >   	hex "Virtual base address of debug UART"
> > @@@ -1854,12 -1760,9 +1772,11 @@@
> >   	default 0xfb020000 if DEBUG_OMAP3UART3
> >   	default 0xfb042000 if DEBUG_OMAP3UART4
> >   	default 0xfb10c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
> > - 	default 0xfc705000 if DEBUG_ZTE_ZX
> >   	default 0xfcfe8600 if DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART
> >   	default 0xfd000000 if DEBUG_SPEAR3XX || DEBUG_SPEAR13XX
> >  +	default 0xfd531000 if DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1
> >   	default 0xfd883000 if DEBUG_ALPINE_UART0
> >  +	default 0xfdd32000 if DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2
> >   	default 0xfe010000 if STM32MP1_DEBUG_UART
> >   	default 0xfe017000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART2
> >   	default 0xfe018000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART3
> > @@@ -1904,10 -1802,8 +1816,10 @@@
> >   		DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
> >   		DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART || \
> >   		DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART || \
> > - 		DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART || DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> > + 		DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> >  -		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART
> >  +		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART || \
> >  +		DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2 || DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1 || \
> >  +		DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
> >   
> >   config DEBUG_UART_8250_SHIFT
> >   	int "Register offset shift for the 8250 debug UART"  
> 
> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> conflict still exists.

This is now a conflict between the arm tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2021-02-20 19:45   ` Alain Volmat
@ 2021-02-21  0:28     ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-02-21  0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alain Volmat
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Russell King,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 300 bytes --]

Hi Alain,

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:45:25 +0100 Alain Volmat <avolmat@me.com> wrote:
>
> sorry for the delay, is there anything I should do concerning this issue
> ?

No, it should be taken care of my the maintainers when they get Linus
to merge their trees.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2021-02-14 22:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-02-20 19:45   ` Alain Volmat
  2021-02-21  0:28     ` Stephen Rothwell
  2021-02-21 22:03   ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Alain Volmat @ 2021-02-20 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Russell King,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

Hi Stephen,

sorry for the delay, is there anything I should do concerning this issue
?

Cheers,
Alain

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:14:44AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:01:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > 
> > between commits:
> > 
> >   9ca4efec0aba ("ARM: 9040/1: use DEBUG_UART_PHYS and DEBUG_UART_VIRT for sti LL_UART")
> >   6e959ad8bb90 ("ARM: 9041/1: sti LL_UART: add STiH418 SBC UART0 support")
> > 
> > from the arm tree and commits:
> > 
> >   f3a732843acc ("ARM: remove sirf prima2/atlas platforms")
> >   89d4f98ae90d ("ARM: remove zte zx platform")
> > 
> > from the arm-soc tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > index 7a8697a97c98,c36c5d4c6e9c..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > @@@ -1623,10 -1546,7 +1550,9 @@@ config DEBUG_LL_INCLUD
> >   	default "debug/renesas-scif.S" if DEBUG_RMOBILE_SCIFA4
> >   	default "debug/s3c24xx.S" if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART
> >   	default "debug/s5pv210.S" if DEBUG_S5PV210_UART
> > - 	default "debug/sirf.S" if DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART
> >  -	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STI_UART
> >  +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2
> >  +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1
> >  +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
> >   	default "debug/stm32.S" if DEBUG_STM32_UART
> >   	default "debug/tegra.S" if DEBUG_TEGRA_UART
> >   	default "debug/ux500.S" if DEBUG_UX500_UART
> > @@@ -1659,8 -1579,6 +1585,7 @@@ config DEBUG_UART_PHY
> >   	default 0x02531000 if DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART1
> >   	default 0x03010fe0 if ARCH_RPC
> >   	default 0x07000000 if DEBUG_SUN9I_UART0
> > - 	default 0x09405000 if DEBUG_ZTE_ZX
> >  +	default 0x09530000 if DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
> >   	default 0x10009000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_STD_PORT || \
> >   				DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CA9
> >   	default 0x1010c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
> > @@@ -1789,10 -1698,8 +1707,10 @@@
> >   		DEBUG_RMOBILE_SCIFA4 || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
> >   		DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART || \
> >   		DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART || \
> > - 		DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART || DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> > + 		DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> >  -		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART
> >  +		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART || \
> >  +		DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2 || DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1 || \
> >  +		DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
> >   
> >   config DEBUG_UART_VIRT
> >   	hex "Virtual base address of debug UART"
> > @@@ -1854,12 -1760,9 +1772,11 @@@
> >   	default 0xfb020000 if DEBUG_OMAP3UART3
> >   	default 0xfb042000 if DEBUG_OMAP3UART4
> >   	default 0xfb10c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
> > - 	default 0xfc705000 if DEBUG_ZTE_ZX
> >   	default 0xfcfe8600 if DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART
> >   	default 0xfd000000 if DEBUG_SPEAR3XX || DEBUG_SPEAR13XX
> >  +	default 0xfd531000 if DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1
> >   	default 0xfd883000 if DEBUG_ALPINE_UART0
> >  +	default 0xfdd32000 if DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2
> >   	default 0xfe010000 if STM32MP1_DEBUG_UART
> >   	default 0xfe017000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART2
> >   	default 0xfe018000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART3
> > @@@ -1904,10 -1802,8 +1816,10 @@@
> >   		DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
> >   		DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART || \
> >   		DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART || \
> > - 		DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART || DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> > + 		DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> >  -		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART
> >  +		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART || \
> >  +		DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2 || DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1 || \
> >  +		DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
> >   
> >   config DEBUG_UART_8250_SHIFT
> >   	int "Register offset shift for the 8250 debug UART"
> 
> With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> conflict still exists.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2021-02-01 22:01 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-02-14 22:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
  2021-02-20 19:45   ` Alain Volmat
  2021-02-21 22:03   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-02-14 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Russell King
  Cc: Alain VOLMAT, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3998 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:01:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   9ca4efec0aba ("ARM: 9040/1: use DEBUG_UART_PHYS and DEBUG_UART_VIRT for sti LL_UART")
>   6e959ad8bb90 ("ARM: 9041/1: sti LL_UART: add STiH418 SBC UART0 support")
> 
> from the arm tree and commits:
> 
>   f3a732843acc ("ARM: remove sirf prima2/atlas platforms")
>   89d4f98ae90d ("ARM: remove zte zx platform")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> index 7a8697a97c98,c36c5d4c6e9c..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> @@@ -1623,10 -1546,7 +1550,9 @@@ config DEBUG_LL_INCLUD
>   	default "debug/renesas-scif.S" if DEBUG_RMOBILE_SCIFA4
>   	default "debug/s3c24xx.S" if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART
>   	default "debug/s5pv210.S" if DEBUG_S5PV210_UART
> - 	default "debug/sirf.S" if DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART
>  -	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STI_UART
>  +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2
>  +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1
>  +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
>   	default "debug/stm32.S" if DEBUG_STM32_UART
>   	default "debug/tegra.S" if DEBUG_TEGRA_UART
>   	default "debug/ux500.S" if DEBUG_UX500_UART
> @@@ -1659,8 -1579,6 +1585,7 @@@ config DEBUG_UART_PHY
>   	default 0x02531000 if DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART1
>   	default 0x03010fe0 if ARCH_RPC
>   	default 0x07000000 if DEBUG_SUN9I_UART0
> - 	default 0x09405000 if DEBUG_ZTE_ZX
>  +	default 0x09530000 if DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
>   	default 0x10009000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_STD_PORT || \
>   				DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CA9
>   	default 0x1010c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
> @@@ -1789,10 -1698,8 +1707,10 @@@
>   		DEBUG_RMOBILE_SCIFA4 || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
>   		DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART || \
>   		DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART || \
> - 		DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART || DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> + 		DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
>  -		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART
>  +		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART || \
>  +		DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2 || DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1 || \
>  +		DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
>   
>   config DEBUG_UART_VIRT
>   	hex "Virtual base address of debug UART"
> @@@ -1854,12 -1760,9 +1772,11 @@@
>   	default 0xfb020000 if DEBUG_OMAP3UART3
>   	default 0xfb042000 if DEBUG_OMAP3UART4
>   	default 0xfb10c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
> - 	default 0xfc705000 if DEBUG_ZTE_ZX
>   	default 0xfcfe8600 if DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART
>   	default 0xfd000000 if DEBUG_SPEAR3XX || DEBUG_SPEAR13XX
>  +	default 0xfd531000 if DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1
>   	default 0xfd883000 if DEBUG_ALPINE_UART0
>  +	default 0xfdd32000 if DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2
>   	default 0xfe010000 if STM32MP1_DEBUG_UART
>   	default 0xfe017000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART2
>   	default 0xfe018000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART3
> @@@ -1904,10 -1802,8 +1816,10 @@@
>   		DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
>   		DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART || \
>   		DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART || \
> - 		DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART || DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
> + 		DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
>  -		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART
>  +		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART || \
>  +		DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2 || DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1 || \
>  +		DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
>   
>   config DEBUG_UART_8250_SHIFT
>   	int "Register offset shift for the 8250 debug UART"

With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2021-02-01 22:01 Stephen Rothwell
  2021-02-14 22:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-02-01 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Russell King
  Cc: Alain VOLMAT, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3646 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/Kconfig.debug

between commits:

  9ca4efec0aba ("ARM: 9040/1: use DEBUG_UART_PHYS and DEBUG_UART_VIRT for sti LL_UART")
  6e959ad8bb90 ("ARM: 9041/1: sti LL_UART: add STiH418 SBC UART0 support")

from the arm tree and commits:

  f3a732843acc ("ARM: remove sirf prima2/atlas platforms")
  89d4f98ae90d ("ARM: remove zte zx platform")

from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
index 7a8697a97c98,c36c5d4c6e9c..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
@@@ -1623,10 -1546,7 +1550,9 @@@ config DEBUG_LL_INCLUD
  	default "debug/renesas-scif.S" if DEBUG_RMOBILE_SCIFA4
  	default "debug/s3c24xx.S" if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART
  	default "debug/s5pv210.S" if DEBUG_S5PV210_UART
- 	default "debug/sirf.S" if DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART
 -	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STI_UART
 +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2
 +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1
 +	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
  	default "debug/stm32.S" if DEBUG_STM32_UART
  	default "debug/tegra.S" if DEBUG_TEGRA_UART
  	default "debug/ux500.S" if DEBUG_UX500_UART
@@@ -1659,8 -1579,6 +1585,7 @@@ config DEBUG_UART_PHY
  	default 0x02531000 if DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART1
  	default 0x03010fe0 if ARCH_RPC
  	default 0x07000000 if DEBUG_SUN9I_UART0
- 	default 0x09405000 if DEBUG_ZTE_ZX
 +	default 0x09530000 if DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
  	default 0x10009000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_STD_PORT || \
  				DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CA9
  	default 0x1010c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
@@@ -1789,10 -1698,8 +1707,10 @@@
  		DEBUG_RMOBILE_SCIFA4 || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
  		DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART || \
  		DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART || \
- 		DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART || DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
+ 		DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
 -		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART
 +		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART || \
 +		DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2 || DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1 || \
 +		DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
  
  config DEBUG_UART_VIRT
  	hex "Virtual base address of debug UART"
@@@ -1854,12 -1760,9 +1772,11 @@@
  	default 0xfb020000 if DEBUG_OMAP3UART3
  	default 0xfb042000 if DEBUG_OMAP3UART4
  	default 0xfb10c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
- 	default 0xfc705000 if DEBUG_ZTE_ZX
  	default 0xfcfe8600 if DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART
  	default 0xfd000000 if DEBUG_SPEAR3XX || DEBUG_SPEAR13XX
 +	default 0xfd531000 if DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1
  	default 0xfd883000 if DEBUG_ALPINE_UART0
 +	default 0xfdd32000 if DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2
  	default 0xfe010000 if STM32MP1_DEBUG_UART
  	default 0xfe017000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART2
  	default 0xfe018000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART3
@@@ -1904,10 -1802,8 +1816,10 @@@
  		DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
  		DEBUG_S3C64XX_UART || \
  		DEBUG_BCM63XX_UART || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART || \
- 		DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART || DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
+ 		DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0 || \
 -		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART
 +		DEBUG_AT91_UART || DEBUG_STM32_UART || \
 +		DEBUG_STIH41X_ASC2 || DEBUG_STIH41X_SBC_ASC1 || \
 +		DEBUG_STIH418_SBC_ASC0
  
  config DEBUG_UART_8250_SHIFT
  	int "Register offset shift for the 8250 debug UART"

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2019-08-29 23:27 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2019-08-30 12:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2019-08-30 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, ARM, Russell King, Linux Next Mailing List,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, Nathan Chancellor

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:27 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/arm/mach-iop13xx/pci.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   4af014984273 ("ARM: 8871/1: iop13xx: Simplify iop13xx_atu{e,x}_pci_status checks")
>
> from the arm tree and commit:
>
>   59d3ae9a5bf6 ("ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support")
>
> from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter removed the file, so I did that) and can
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Yes, that's good. Russell, you could drop the patch from your tree if
you like, or let Linus handle the trivial conflict.

       Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2019-08-29 23:27 Stephen Rothwell
  2019-08-30 12:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-08-29 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Russell King
  Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Nathan Chancellor

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 786 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/mach-iop13xx/pci.c

between commit:

  4af014984273 ("ARM: 8871/1: iop13xx: Simplify iop13xx_atu{e,x}_pci_status checks")

from the arm tree and commit:

  59d3ae9a5bf6 ("ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support")

from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (the latter removed the file, so I did that) and can
carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2018-05-29 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2018-05-29 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Russell King
  Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Florian Fainelli, Doug Berger

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1679 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h

between commit:

  1067a8130b17 ("ARM: add more CPU part numbers for Cortex and Brahma B15 CPUs")

from the arm tree and commits:

  9e35ddc962a6 ("ARM: add Broadcom Brahma-B53 main ID definition")
  842fa17d6c95 ("ARM: add Broadcom Brahma-B15 main ID definition")

from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h
index 26021980504d,d1b62ee69f3b..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h
@@@ -77,15 -75,11 +75,16 @@@
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A12		0x4100c0d0
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A17		0x4100c0e0
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15		0x4100c0f0
 +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A53		0x4100d030
 +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A57		0x4100d070
 +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A72		0x4100d080
 +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A73		0x4100d090
 +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A75		0x4100d0a0
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_MASK		0xff00fff0
  
- /* Broadcom cores */
+ /* Broadcom implemented processors */
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_BRAHMA_B15		0x420000f0
+ #define ARM_CPU_PART_BRAHMA_B53		0x42001000
  
  /* DEC implemented cores */
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_SA1100		0x4400a110

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2018-05-23 12:25 Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2018-05-23 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, Russell King, Florian Fainelli,
	Doug Berger
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Linux-Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1522 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h

between commit:

  b2ccaa851e9882c10 ("ARM: add CPU part numbers for Cortex A73, A75 and Brahma B15")

from the arm tree and several commits from the arm-soc tree:

  842fa17d6c95368d7 ("ARM: add Broadcom Brahma-B15 main ID definition")
  9e35ddc962a656bf4 ("ARM: add Broadcom Brahma-B53 main ID definition")

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h
index adc4a3eef815,d1b62ee69f3b..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h
@@@ -77,12 -75,11 +75,13 @@@
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A12		0x4100c0d0
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A17		0x4100c0e0
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15		0x4100c0f0
 +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A73		0x4100d090
 +#define ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A75		0x4100d0a0
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_MASK		0xff00fff0
  
 -/* Broadcom implemented processors */
 +/* Broadcom cores */
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_BRAHMA_B15		0x420000f0
+ #define ARM_CPU_PART_BRAHMA_B53		0x42001000
  
  /* DEC implemented cores */
  #define ARM_CPU_PART_SA1100		0x4400a110

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2017-01-17 22:49 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2017-01-17 22:53 ` Florian Fainelli
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2017-01-17 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Russell King
  Cc: Linus Walleij, linux-next, linux-kernel

On 01/17/2017 02:49 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/mach-ux500/platsmp.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   6996cbb23721 ("ARM: 8641/1: treewide: Replace uses of virt_to_phys with __pa_symbol")
> 
> from the arm tree and commit:
> 
>   9e634cae7256 ("ARM: ux500: simplify secondary boot")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Your resolution looks correct, thanks Stephen!
-- 
Florian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2017-01-17 22:49 Stephen Rothwell
  2017-01-17 22:53 ` Florian Fainelli
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2017-01-17 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, ARM, Russell King
  Cc: Florian Fainelli, Linus Walleij, linux-next, linux-kernel

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/mach-ux500/platsmp.c

between commit:

  6996cbb23721 ("ARM: 8641/1: treewide: Replace uses of virt_to_phys with __pa_symbol")

from the arm tree and commit:

  9e634cae7256 ("ARM: ux500: simplify secondary boot")

from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-ux500/platsmp.c
index 8c8f26389067,e0ee139fdebf..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/platsmp.c
@@@ -92,7 -73,19 +73,19 @@@ static void __init ux500_smp_prepare_cp
  
  static int ux500_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
  {
- 	wakeup_secondary();
+ 	/*
+ 	 * write the address of secondary startup into the backup ram register
+ 	 * at offset 0x1FF4, then write the magic number 0xA1FEED01 to the
+ 	 * backup ram register at offset 0x1FF0, which is what boot rom code
+ 	 * is waiting for. This will wake up the secondary core from WFE.
+ 	 */
 -	writel(virt_to_phys(secondary_startup),
++	writel(__pa_symbol(secondary_startup),
+ 	       backupram + UX500_CPU1_JUMPADDR_OFFSET);
+ 	writel(0xA1FEED01,
+ 	       backupram + UX500_CPU1_WAKEMAGIC_OFFSET);
+ 
+ 	/* make sure write buffer is drained */
+ 	mb();
  	arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu));
  	return 0;
  }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2015-08-11 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
  2015-08-11 23:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
@ 2015-09-02  0:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2015-09-02  0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Mark Rutland, Will Deacon, Nicolas Pitre

Hi Russell,

On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:48:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/kernel/psci.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   be120397e770 ("ARM: migrate to common PSCI client code")
> 
> from the arm tree and commit:
> 
>   19c233b79d1a ("ARM: appropriate __init annotation for const data")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former removed the file, so I did that, then added
> the following patch) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

These fixups are now being applied to the merge of the arm tree as the
arm-soc commit above has been merged into Linus' tree.

> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:39:15 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix for PSCI code movement
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/psci.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> index a6956007dd38..42700f09a8c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ out_put_node:
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
> +static const struct of_device_id const psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
>  	{ .compatible = "arm,psci",	.data = psci_0_1_init},
>  	{ .compatible = "arm,psci-0.2",	.data = psci_0_2_init},
>  	{},
> -- 
> 2.5.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2015-08-11 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2015-08-11 23:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
  2015-09-02  0:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pitre @ 2015-08-11 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	linux-next, linux-kernel, Mark Rutland, Will Deacon

On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/kernel/psci.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   be120397e770 ("ARM: migrate to common PSCI client code")
> 
> from the arm tree and commit:
> 
>   19c233b79d1a ("ARM: appropriate __init annotation for const data")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former removed the file, so I did that, then added
> the following patch) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

The fix is correct, thanks.


> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:39:15 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix for PSCI code movement
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/psci.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> index a6956007dd38..42700f09a8c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ out_put_node:
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
> +static const struct of_device_id const psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
>  	{ .compatible = "arm,psci",	.data = psci_0_1_init},
>  	{ .compatible = "arm,psci-0.2",	.data = psci_0_2_init},
>  	{},
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2015-08-11 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
  2015-08-11 23:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
  2015-09-02  0:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2015-08-11 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Mark Rutland, Will Deacon, Nicolas Pitre

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:

  arch/arm/kernel/psci.c

between commit:

  be120397e770 ("ARM: migrate to common PSCI client code")

from the arm tree and commit:

  19c233b79d1a ("ARM: appropriate __init annotation for const data")

from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (the former removed the file, so I did that, then added
the following patch) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:39:15 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix for PSCI code movement

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/firmware/psci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
index a6956007dd38..42700f09a8c5 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ out_put_node:
 	return err;
 }
 
-static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
+static const struct of_device_id const psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
 	{ .compatible = "arm,psci",	.data = psci_0_1_init},
 	{ .compatible = "arm,psci-0.2",	.data = psci_0_2_init},
 	{},
-- 
2.5.0

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2015-06-01 22:47 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2015-06-01 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Dinh Nguyen

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 907 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/core.h between commit 02b4e2756e01 ("ARM: v7
setup function should invalidate L1 cache") from the arm tree and
commit 122694a0c712 ("ARM: socfpga: use of_iomap to map the SCU") from
the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-socfpga/core.h
index 767c09e954a0,5913bbb50036..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/core.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/core.h
@@@ -31,8 -31,8 +31,6 @@@
  
  #define RSTMGR_MPUMODRST_CPU1		0x2     /* CPU1 Reset */
  
- extern void __iomem *socfpga_scu_base_addr;
 -extern void socfpga_secondary_startup(void);
--
  extern void socfpga_init_clocks(void);
  extern void socfpga_sysmgr_init(void);
  

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2015-01-29 22:55 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2015-01-29 23:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2015-01-29 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Daniel Thompson, Guo Zeng, Barry Song,
	Baruch Siach

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 09:55:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commit 4d31e6641295 ("ARM: 8272/1: netx:
> Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared directory") from the  tree and
> commits 01ea63d99397 ("ARM: sirf: add two debug ports for CSRatlas7
> SoC") and e23814da8262 ("ARM: digicolor: add low level debug support")
> from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

Both of these conflict resolutions (the other one you sent after this)
look reasonable, thanks Stephen.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2015-01-29 22:55 Stephen Rothwell
  2015-01-29 23:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2015-01-29 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Daniel Thompson, Guo Zeng, Barry Song,
	Baruch Siach

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1785 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commit 4d31e6641295 ("ARM: 8272/1: netx:
Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared directory") from the  tree and
commits 01ea63d99397 ("ARM: sirf: add two debug ports for CSRatlas7
SoC") and e23814da8262 ("ARM: digicolor: add low level debug support")
from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
index a324ecdfeb21,b6a073de1559..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
@@@ -1448,17 -1461,15 +1517,19 @@@ config DEBUG_UART_VIR
  	default 0xfef00000 if ARCH_IXP4XX && !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
  	default 0xfef00003 if ARCH_IXP4XX && CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
  	default 0xfef36000 if DEBUG_HIGHBANK_UART
 +	default 0xfefb0000 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART1 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART1
 +	default 0xfefb0800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART2 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART2
 +	default 0xfefb9800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART3 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART3
  	default 0xfefff700 if ARCH_IOP33X
  	default 0xff003000 if DEBUG_U300_UART
+ 	default 0xffd01000 if DEBUG_HIP01_UART
  	default DEBUG_UART_PHYS if !MMU
  	depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_LL_UART_PL01X || \
  		DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X || DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO || \
 -		DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
 +		DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_NETX_UART || \
 +		DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
- 		DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART
+ 		DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX || DEBUG_ASM9260_UART || \
+ 		DEBUG_SIRFSOC_UART || DEBUG_DIGICOLOR_UA0
  
  config DEBUG_UART_8250_SHIFT
  	int "Register offset shift for the 8250 debug UART"

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2014-09-26  9:27   ` Daniel Thompson
@ 2014-09-26 13:52     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2014-09-26 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Thompson
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-next, linux-kernel, Carlo Caione,
	Krzysztof Hałasa, Florian Fainelli

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:27:49AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 26/09/14 09:18, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:23:44AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> >> arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commits 0889a9e35bd3 ("ARM: 8142/1:
> >> ks8695: Migrate debug_ll macros to shared directory"), e38c399ca584
> >> ("ARM: 8144/2: netx: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared directory"),
> >> 6741cacfa3f1 ("ARM: 8145/1: sa1100: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared
> >> directory") and debf843bf7ee ("ARM: 8146/1: Seperate DEBUG_UART_PHYS
> >> from DEBUG_LL on EP93XX") from the arm tree and commits d8a00916b303
> >> ("ARM: meson: debug: add debug UART for earlyprintk support"),
> >> b125170a39ea ("CNS3xxx: Fix debug UART") and b51312bebfa4 ("ARM:
> >> BCM63XX: add low-level UART debug support") from the arm-soc tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as
> >> necessary (no action is required).
> >>
> >> You may be able to clean some of this up by using intermediate config
> >> symbols that are selected by the low level symbols and depended upon by
> >> the higher level config symbols.
> > 
> > Actually, I'll drop the patch set I have.  I didn't spot this earlier,
> > but people seem to have a hard time sorting stuff numerically:
> > 
> >         default 0xffd82340 if ARCH_IOP13XX
> > +       default 0xfffb0000 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART1 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART1
> > +       default 0xfffb0800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART2 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART2
> > +       default 0xfffb9800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART3 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART3
> >         default 0xfff36000 if DEBUG_HIGHBANK_UART
> 
> Oops. This is disappointing from my point-of-view but there's no one to
> blame but me.
> 
> I have fixed this in my tree and will requeue for 3.19.

Okay, I've dropped 8141/1 onwards, so the only patches I have from your
series are:

ep93xx: Enable DEBUG_LL_UART_PL01X
versatile: Enable DEBUG_LL_UART_PL01X

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2014-09-26  8:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2014-09-26  9:27   ` Daniel Thompson
  2014-09-26 13:52     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Thompson @ 2014-09-26  9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King - ARM Linux, Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Carlo Caione, Krzysztof Hałasa,
	Florian Fainelli

On 26/09/14 09:18, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:23:44AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>> arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commits 0889a9e35bd3 ("ARM: 8142/1:
>> ks8695: Migrate debug_ll macros to shared directory"), e38c399ca584
>> ("ARM: 8144/2: netx: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared directory"),
>> 6741cacfa3f1 ("ARM: 8145/1: sa1100: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared
>> directory") and debf843bf7ee ("ARM: 8146/1: Seperate DEBUG_UART_PHYS
>> from DEBUG_LL on EP93XX") from the arm tree and commits d8a00916b303
>> ("ARM: meson: debug: add debug UART for earlyprintk support"),
>> b125170a39ea ("CNS3xxx: Fix debug UART") and b51312bebfa4 ("ARM:
>> BCM63XX: add low-level UART debug support") from the arm-soc tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as
>> necessary (no action is required).
>>
>> You may be able to clean some of this up by using intermediate config
>> symbols that are selected by the low level symbols and depended upon by
>> the higher level config symbols.
> 
> Actually, I'll drop the patch set I have.  I didn't spot this earlier,
> but people seem to have a hard time sorting stuff numerically:
> 
>         default 0xffd82340 if ARCH_IOP13XX
> +       default 0xfffb0000 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART1 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART1
> +       default 0xfffb0800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART2 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART2
> +       default 0xfffb9800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART3 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART3
>         default 0xfff36000 if DEBUG_HIGHBANK_UART

Oops. This is disappointing from my point-of-view but there's no one to
blame but me.

I have fixed this in my tree and will requeue for 3.19.


> It also looks like the same is true for arm-soc:
> 
>> @@@ -1174,9 -1133,7 +1213,10 @@@
>>   	default 0x50008000 if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART && (DEBUG_S3C_UART2 || \
>>   				DEBUG_S3C2410_UART2)
>>   	default 0x7c0003f8 if FOOTBRIDGE
>>  +	default 0x80010000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART1
>>  +	default 0x80030000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART2
>>  +	default 0x80050000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART3
>> + 	default 0x78000000 if DEBUG_CNS3XXX
> 
> Last time I checked, 0x78000000 comes before 0x7c0003f8.
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2014-09-26  8:19 ` Carlo Caione
@ 2014-09-26  8:39   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-09-26  8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Carlo Caione
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	linux-next, linux-kernel, Daniel Thompson, Krzysztof Hałasa,
	Florian Fainelli

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 459 bytes --]

Hi Carlo,

On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:19:43 +0200 Carlo Caione <carlo@caione.org> wrote:
>
> Am I going blind or these two lines are missing from d8a00916b303
> 
> +       default 0xc81004c0 if DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO
> ...
> +       default 0xf31004c0 if DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO

They are in the final version of arch/arm/Kconfig.debug, just not shown
in the conflict resolution above.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2014-09-26  1:23 Stephen Rothwell
  2014-09-26  8:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2014-09-26  8:19 ` Carlo Caione
  2014-09-26  8:39   ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Carlo Caione @ 2014-09-26  8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King,
	linux-next, linux-kernel, Daniel Thompson, Carlo Caione,
	Krzysztof Hałasa, Florian Fainelli

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commits 0889a9e35bd3 ("ARM: 8142/1:
> ks8695: Migrate debug_ll macros to shared directory"), e38c399ca584
> ("ARM: 8144/2: netx: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared directory"),
> 6741cacfa3f1 ("ARM: 8145/1: sa1100: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared
> directory") and debf843bf7ee ("ARM: 8146/1: Seperate DEBUG_UART_PHYS
> from DEBUG_LL on EP93XX") from the arm tree and commits d8a00916b303
> ("ARM: meson: debug: add debug UART for earlyprintk support"),
> b125170a39ea ("CNS3xxx: Fix debug UART") and b51312bebfa4 ("ARM:
> BCM63XX: add low-level UART debug support") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
>
> You may be able to clean some of this up by using intermediate config
> symbols that are selected by the low level symbols and depended upon by
> the higher level config symbols.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> index 4fcff7737dd1,0d714e10f0a2..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> @@@ -348,13 -365,13 +365,20 @@@ choic
>                   Say Y here if you want the debug print routines to direct
>                   their output to UART1 serial port on KEYSTONE2 devices.
>
>  +      config DEBUG_KS8695_UART
>  +              bool "KS8695 Debug UART"
>  +              depends on ARCH_KS8695
>  +              help
>  +                Say Y here if you want kernel low-level debugging support
>  +                on KS8695.
>  +
> +       config DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO
> +               bool "Kernel low-level debugging via Meson6 UARTAO"
> +               depends on ARCH_MESON
> +               help
> +                 Say Y here if you want kernel low-lever debugging support
> +                 on Amlogic Meson6 based platforms on the UARTAO.
> +
>         config DEBUG_MMP_UART2
>                 bool "Kernel low-level debugging message via MMP UART2"
>                 depends on ARCH_MMP
> @@@ -1136,9 -1091,12 +1170,13 @@@ config DEBUG_UART_825
>                 ARCH_IOP33X || ARCH_IXP4XX || \
>                 ARCH_LPC32XX || ARCH_MV78XX0 || ARCH_ORION5X || ARCH_RPC
>
> + # Compatibility options for BCM63xx
> + config DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
> +       def_bool ARCH_BCM_63XX
> +
>   config DEBUG_UART_PHYS
>         hex "Physical base address of debug UART"
>  +      default 0x00100a00 if DEBUG_NETX_UART
>         default 0x01c20000 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_DMx_UART0
>         default 0x01c28000 if DEBUG_SUNXI_UART0
>         default 0x01c28400 if DEBUG_SUNXI_UART1
> @@@ -1174,9 -1133,7 +1213,10 @@@
>         default 0x50008000 if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART && (DEBUG_S3C_UART2 || \
>                                 DEBUG_S3C2410_UART2)
>         default 0x7c0003f8 if FOOTBRIDGE
>  +      default 0x80010000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART1
>  +      default 0x80030000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART2
>  +      default 0x80050000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART3
> +       default 0x78000000 if DEBUG_CNS3XXX
>         default 0x80070000 if DEBUG_IMX23_UART
>         default 0x80074000 if DEBUG_IMX28_UART
>         default 0x80230000 if DEBUG_PICOXCELL_UART
> @@@ -1204,17 -1163,14 +1246,18 @@@
>         default 0xff690000 if DEBUG_RK32_UART2
>         default 0xffc02000 if DEBUG_SOCFPGA_UART
>         default 0xffd82340 if ARCH_IOP13XX
>  +      default 0xfffb0000 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART1 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART1
>  +      default 0xfffb0800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART2 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART2
>  +      default 0xfffb9800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART3 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART3
>         default 0xfff36000 if DEBUG_HIGHBANK_UART
> +       default 0xfffe8600 if DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
>         default 0xfffff700 if ARCH_IOP33X
>         depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_LL_UART_PL01X || \
>                 DEBUG_LL_UART_EFM32 || \
> -               DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X || \
> +               DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X || DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO || \
>  -              DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
>  -              DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
>  +              DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_NETX_UART || DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || \
>  +              DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_SA1100_UART || \
> -               ARCH_EP93XX
> ++              ARCH_EP93XX || DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
>
>   config DEBUG_UART_VIRT
>         hex "Virtual base address of debug UART"
> @@@ -1241,14 -1196,14 +1284,17 @@@
>         default 0xf7008000 if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART && (DEBUG_S3C_UART2 || \
>                                 DEBUG_S3C2410_UART2)
>         default 0xf7fc9000 if DEBUG_BERLIN_UART
> +       default 0xf8007000 if DEBUG_HIP04_UART
>         default 0xf8009000 if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CA9
>  +      default 0xf8010000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART1
>  +      default 0xf8030000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART2
>  +      default 0xf8050000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART3
>         default 0xf8090000 if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_RS1
>         default 0xfa71e000 if DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM
> +       default 0xfb002000 if DEBUG_CNS3XXX
>         default 0xfb009000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_STD_PORT
>         default 0xfb10c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
> +       default 0xfcfe8600 if DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
>         default 0xfd000000 if ARCH_SPEAR3XX || ARCH_SPEAR6XX
>         default 0xfd000000 if ARCH_SPEAR13XX
>         default 0xfd012000 if ARCH_MV78XX0
> @@@ -1288,9 -1241,9 +1335,9 @@@
>         default 0xff003000 if DEBUG_U300_UART
>         default DEBUG_UART_PHYS if !MMU
>         depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_LL_UART_PL01X || \
> -               DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X || \
> +               DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X || DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO || \
>  -              DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
>  -              DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
>  +              DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_NETX_UART || DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || \
> -               DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_SA1100_UART
> ++              DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_SA1100_UART || DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
>
>   config DEBUG_UART_8250_SHIFT
>         int "Register offset shift for the 8250 debug UART"

Hi Stephen,
Am I going blind or these two lines are missing from d8a00916b303

+       default 0xc81004c0 if DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO
...
+       default 0xf31004c0 if DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO

Thanks,

-- 
Carlo Caione

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2014-09-26  1:23 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2014-09-26  8:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2014-09-26  9:27   ` Daniel Thompson
  2014-09-26  8:19 ` Carlo Caione
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2014-09-26  8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Daniel Thompson, Carlo Caione,
	Krzysztof Hałasa, Florian Fainelli

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:23:44AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commits 0889a9e35bd3 ("ARM: 8142/1:
> ks8695: Migrate debug_ll macros to shared directory"), e38c399ca584
> ("ARM: 8144/2: netx: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared directory"),
> 6741cacfa3f1 ("ARM: 8145/1: sa1100: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared
> directory") and debf843bf7ee ("ARM: 8146/1: Seperate DEBUG_UART_PHYS
> from DEBUG_LL on EP93XX") from the arm tree and commits d8a00916b303
> ("ARM: meson: debug: add debug UART for earlyprintk support"),
> b125170a39ea ("CNS3xxx: Fix debug UART") and b51312bebfa4 ("ARM:
> BCM63XX: add low-level UART debug support") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary (no action is required).
> 
> You may be able to clean some of this up by using intermediate config
> symbols that are selected by the low level symbols and depended upon by
> the higher level config symbols.

Actually, I'll drop the patch set I have.  I didn't spot this earlier,
but people seem to have a hard time sorting stuff numerically:

        default 0xffd82340 if ARCH_IOP13XX
+       default 0xfffb0000 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART1 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART1
+       default 0xfffb0800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART2 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART2
+       default 0xfffb9800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART3 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART3
        default 0xfff36000 if DEBUG_HIGHBANK_UART

It also looks like the same is true for arm-soc:

> @@@ -1174,9 -1133,7 +1213,10 @@@
>   	default 0x50008000 if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART && (DEBUG_S3C_UART2 || \
>   				DEBUG_S3C2410_UART2)
>   	default 0x7c0003f8 if FOOTBRIDGE
>  +	default 0x80010000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART1
>  +	default 0x80030000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART2
>  +	default 0x80050000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART3
> + 	default 0x78000000 if DEBUG_CNS3XXX

Last time I checked, 0x78000000 comes before 0x7c0003f8.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2014-09-26  1:23 Stephen Rothwell
  2014-09-26  8:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2014-09-26  8:19 ` Carlo Caione
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-09-26  1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Daniel Thompson, Carlo Caione,
	Krzysztof Hałasa, Florian Fainelli

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5400 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/Kconfig.debug between commits 0889a9e35bd3 ("ARM: 8142/1:
ks8695: Migrate debug_ll macros to shared directory"), e38c399ca584
("ARM: 8144/2: netx: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared directory"),
6741cacfa3f1 ("ARM: 8145/1: sa1100: Migrate DEBUG_LL macros to shared
directory") and debf843bf7ee ("ARM: 8146/1: Seperate DEBUG_UART_PHYS
from DEBUG_LL on EP93XX") from the arm tree and commits d8a00916b303
("ARM: meson: debug: add debug UART for earlyprintk support"),
b125170a39ea ("CNS3xxx: Fix debug UART") and b51312bebfa4 ("ARM:
BCM63XX: add low-level UART debug support") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).

You may be able to clean some of this up by using intermediate config
symbols that are selected by the low level symbols and depended upon by
the higher level config symbols.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
index 4fcff7737dd1,0d714e10f0a2..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
@@@ -348,13 -365,13 +365,20 @@@ choic
  		  Say Y here if you want the debug print routines to direct
  		  their output to UART1 serial port on KEYSTONE2 devices.
  
 +	config DEBUG_KS8695_UART
 +		bool "KS8695 Debug UART"
 +		depends on ARCH_KS8695
 +		help
 +		  Say Y here if you want kernel low-level debugging support
 +		  on KS8695.
 +
+ 	config DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO
+ 		bool "Kernel low-level debugging via Meson6 UARTAO"
+ 		depends on ARCH_MESON
+ 		help
+ 		  Say Y here if you want kernel low-lever debugging support
+ 		  on Amlogic Meson6 based platforms on the UARTAO.
+ 
  	config DEBUG_MMP_UART2
  		bool "Kernel low-level debugging message via MMP UART2"
  		depends on ARCH_MMP
@@@ -1136,9 -1091,12 +1170,13 @@@ config DEBUG_UART_825
  		ARCH_IOP33X || ARCH_IXP4XX || \
  		ARCH_LPC32XX || ARCH_MV78XX0 || ARCH_ORION5X || ARCH_RPC
  
+ # Compatibility options for BCM63xx
+ config DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
+ 	def_bool ARCH_BCM_63XX
+ 
  config DEBUG_UART_PHYS
  	hex "Physical base address of debug UART"
 +	default 0x00100a00 if DEBUG_NETX_UART
  	default 0x01c20000 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_DMx_UART0
  	default 0x01c28000 if DEBUG_SUNXI_UART0
  	default 0x01c28400 if DEBUG_SUNXI_UART1
@@@ -1174,9 -1133,7 +1213,10 @@@
  	default 0x50008000 if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART && (DEBUG_S3C_UART2 || \
  				DEBUG_S3C2410_UART2)
  	default 0x7c0003f8 if FOOTBRIDGE
 +	default 0x80010000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART1
 +	default 0x80030000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART2
 +	default 0x80050000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART3
+ 	default 0x78000000 if DEBUG_CNS3XXX
  	default 0x80070000 if DEBUG_IMX23_UART
  	default 0x80074000 if DEBUG_IMX28_UART
  	default 0x80230000 if DEBUG_PICOXCELL_UART
@@@ -1204,17 -1163,14 +1246,18 @@@
  	default 0xff690000 if DEBUG_RK32_UART2
  	default 0xffc02000 if DEBUG_SOCFPGA_UART
  	default 0xffd82340 if ARCH_IOP13XX
 +	default 0xfffb0000 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART1 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART1
 +	default 0xfffb0800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART2 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART2
 +	default 0xfffb9800 if DEBUG_OMAP1UART3 || DEBUG_OMAP7XXUART3
  	default 0xfff36000 if DEBUG_HIGHBANK_UART
+ 	default 0xfffe8600 if DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
  	default 0xfffff700 if ARCH_IOP33X
  	depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_LL_UART_PL01X || \
  		DEBUG_LL_UART_EFM32 || \
- 		DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X || \
+ 		DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X || DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO || \
 -		DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
 -		DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
 +		DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_NETX_UART || DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || \
 +		DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_SA1100_UART || \
- 		ARCH_EP93XX
++		ARCH_EP93XX || DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
  
  config DEBUG_UART_VIRT
  	hex "Virtual base address of debug UART"
@@@ -1241,14 -1196,14 +1284,17 @@@
  	default 0xf7008000 if DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART && (DEBUG_S3C_UART2 || \
  				DEBUG_S3C2410_UART2)
  	default 0xf7fc9000 if DEBUG_BERLIN_UART
+ 	default 0xf8007000 if DEBUG_HIP04_UART
  	default 0xf8009000 if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CA9
 +	default 0xf8010000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART1
 +	default 0xf8030000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART2
 +	default 0xf8050000 if DEBUG_SA1100_UART3
  	default 0xf8090000 if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_RS1
  	default 0xfa71e000 if DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM
+ 	default 0xfb002000 if DEBUG_CNS3XXX
  	default 0xfb009000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_STD_PORT
  	default 0xfb10c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
+ 	default 0xfcfe8600 if DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
  	default 0xfd000000 if ARCH_SPEAR3XX || ARCH_SPEAR6XX
  	default 0xfd000000 if ARCH_SPEAR13XX
  	default 0xfd012000 if ARCH_MV78XX0
@@@ -1288,9 -1241,9 +1335,9 @@@
  	default 0xff003000 if DEBUG_U300_UART
  	default DEBUG_UART_PHYS if !MMU
  	depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_LL_UART_PL01X || \
- 		DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X || \
+ 		DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X || DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO || \
 -		DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || \
 -		DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
 +		DEBUG_MSM_UART || DEBUG_NETX_UART || DEBUG_QCOM_UARTDM || \
- 		DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_SA1100_UART
++		DEBUG_S3C24XX_UART || DEBUG_SA1100_UART || DEBUG_UART_BCM63XX
  
  config DEBUG_UART_8250_SHIFT
  	int "Register offset shift for the 8250 debug UART"

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2014-07-25  0:13 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-07-25  0:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Uwe Kleine-König, Linus Walleij

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 533 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-integrator/include/mach/memory.h between commit
3ae4e9812941 ("ARM: 8113/1: remove remaining definitions of
PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET from <mach/memory.h>") from the arm tree and commit
e6dc195c1c69 ("ARM: integrator: get rid of <mach/memory.h>") from the
arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2014-06-02  0:49 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2014-06-02  3:28 ` Olof Johansson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Olof Johansson @ 2014-06-02  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King, linux-next, linux-kernel

On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c between commits dfbdd3d55403 ("ARM: l2c:
> exynos: remove cache size override"), 25a9ef63cd2b ("ARM: l2c: exynos:
> convert to common l2c310 early resume functionality") and 15b0bc4041ba
> ("ARM: l2c: exynos: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation (and
> thereby fix it)") from the arm tree and commit b5b9324a6296 ("ARM:
> exynos: don't run exynos4 l2x0 setup on other platforms") from the
> arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removes the code updated by the latter) and
> can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

Looks good. Thanks.


-Olof

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2014-06-02  0:49 Stephen Rothwell
  2014-06-02  3:28 ` Olof Johansson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-06-02  0:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1735 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c between commits dfbdd3d55403 ("ARM: l2c:
exynos: remove cache size override"), 25a9ef63cd2b ("ARM: l2c: exynos:
convert to common l2c310 early resume functionality") and 15b0bc4041ba
("ARM: l2c: exynos: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation (and
thereby fix it)") from the arm tree and commit b5b9324a6296 ("ARM:
exynos: don't run exynos4 l2x0 setup on other platforms") from the
arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (the former removes the code updated by the latter) and
can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index a763c0862da9,bc43e22693b7..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@@ -305,17 -246,25 +243,6 @@@ void __init exynos_init_io(void
  	exynos_map_io();
  }
  
- struct bus_type exynos_subsys = {
- 	.name		= "exynos-core",
- 	.dev_name	= "exynos-core",
- };
- 
- static int __init exynos_core_init(void)
 -static int __init exynos4_l2x0_cache_init(void)
--{
- 	return subsys_system_register(&exynos_subsys, NULL);
 -	int ret;
 -
 -	if (!soc_is_exynos4())
 -		return 0;
 -
 -	ret = l2x0_of_init(L2_AUX_VAL, L2_AUX_MASK);
 -	if (ret)
 -		return ret;
 -
 -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_S5P_SLEEP)) {
 -		l2x0_regs_phys = virt_to_phys(&l2x0_saved_regs);
 -		clean_dcache_area(&l2x0_regs_phys, sizeof(unsigned long));
 -	}
 -	return 0;
--}
- core_initcall(exynos_core_init);
 -early_initcall(exynos4_l2x0_cache_init);
--
  static void __init exynos_dt_machine_init(void)
  {
  	struct device_node *i2c_np;

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2014-05-27  0:52 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-05-27  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Michal Simek

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2069 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c between commit e1e4ccb5b1b6 ("ARM: l2c:
zynq: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation") from the arm tree and
commit 00f7dc636366 ("ARM: zynq: Add support for SOC_BUS") from the
arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
index d1e992e6403e,edbd9d83f407..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
@@@ -66,8 -105,43 +105,38 @@@ static int __init zynq_get_revision(voi
  static void __init zynq_init_machine(void)
  {
  	struct platform_device_info devinfo = { .name = "cpufreq-cpu0", };
+ 	struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
+ 	struct soc_device *soc_dev;
+ 	struct device *parent = NULL;
+ 
 -	/*
 -	 * 64KB way size, 8-way associativity, parity disabled
 -	 */
 -	l2x0_of_init(0x02060000, 0xF0F0FFFF);
 -
+ 	soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
+ 	if (!soc_dev_attr)
+ 		goto out;
+ 
+ 	system_rev = zynq_get_revision();
+ 
+ 	soc_dev_attr->family = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "Xilinx Zynq");
+ 	soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "0x%x", system_rev);
+ 	soc_dev_attr->soc_id = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "0x%x",
+ 					 zynq_slcr_get_device_id());
+ 
+ 	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
+ 	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
+ 		kfree(soc_dev_attr->family);
+ 		kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
+ 		kfree(soc_dev_attr->soc_id);
+ 		kfree(soc_dev_attr);
+ 		goto out;
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	parent = soc_device_to_device(soc_dev);
  
- 	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
+ out:
+ 	/*
+ 	 * Finished with the static registrations now; fill in the missing
+ 	 * devices
+ 	 */
+ 	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, parent);
  
  	platform_device_register(&zynq_cpuidle_device);
  	platform_device_register_full(&devinfo);

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2014-05-27  0:48 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-05-27  0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Heiko Stübner

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1002 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rockchip.c between commit fc2553457ccd ("ARM:
l2c: rockchip: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation") from the arm
tree and commit 26ab69cb4c1f ("ARM: rockchip: convert smp bringup to
CPU_METHOD_OF_DECLARE") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rockchip.c
index 138b9975313a,4499b0a31a27..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rockchip.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rockchip.c
@@@ -33,8 -39,6 +33,7 @@@ static const char * const rockchip_boar
  };
  
  DT_MACHINE_START(ROCKCHIP_DT, "Rockchip Cortex-A9 (Device Tree)")
 -	.init_machine	= rockchip_dt_init,
 +	.l2c_aux_val	= 0,
 +	.l2c_aux_mask	= ~0,
- 	.smp		= smp_ops(rockchip_smp_ops),
  	.dt_compat	= rockchip_board_dt_compat,
  MACHINE_END

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2014-05-23  0:45 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2014-05-23 13:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Gregory CLEMENT @ 2014-05-23 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann,
	linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: Thomas Petazzoni, linux-next, linux-kernel, Jason Cooper

Hi Stephen,

On 23/05/2014 02:45, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c between commit 8ae2473d96f1 ("ARM: l2c:
> mvebu: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation") from the arm tree and
> commit 5686a1e5aa43 ("bus: mvebu: pass the coherency availability
> information at init time") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
> 

This fix seems to be the good thing to do.

Thanks,

Gregory


> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2014-05-23  0:53 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-05-23  0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Pawel Moll

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3149 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c between commit 86cb8830d957 ("ARM: l2c:
vexpress: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation") from the arm tree
and commits 3b9334ac835b ("mfd: vexpress: Convert custom func API to
regmap") and d2606f81d563 ("ARM: vexpress: Simplify SMP operations for
DT-powered system") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
index b2fea70d412d,38f4f6f37770..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
@@@ -369,70 -370,10 +370,9 @@@ MACHINE_START(VEXPRESS, "ARM-Versatile 
  	.init_machine	= v2m_init,
  MACHINE_END
  
- static struct map_desc v2m_rs1_io_desc __initdata = {
- 	.virtual	= V2M_PERIPH,
- 	.pfn		= __phys_to_pfn(0x1c000000),
- 	.length		= SZ_2M,
- 	.type		= MT_DEVICE,
- };
- 
- static int __init v2m_dt_scan_memory_map(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
- 		int depth, void *data)
- {
- 	const char **map = data;
- 
- 	if (strcmp(uname, "motherboard") != 0)
- 		return 0;
- 
- 	*map = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "arm,v2m-memory-map", NULL);
- 
- 	return 1;
- }
- 
- void __init v2m_dt_map_io(void)
- {
- 	const char *map = NULL;
- 
- 	of_scan_flat_dt(v2m_dt_scan_memory_map, &map);
- 
- 	if (map && strcmp(map, "rs1") == 0)
- 		iotable_init(&v2m_rs1_io_desc, 1);
- 	else
- 		iotable_init(v2m_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(v2m_io_desc));
- 
- #if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
- 	vexpress_dt_smp_map_io();
- #endif
- }
- 
- void __init v2m_dt_init_early(void)
- {
- 	u32 dt_hbi;
- 
- 	vexpress_sysreg_of_early_init();
- 
- 	/* Confirm board type against DT property, if available */
- 	if (of_property_read_u32(of_allnodes, "arm,hbi", &dt_hbi) == 0) {
- 		u32 hbi = vexpress_get_hbi(VEXPRESS_SITE_MASTER);
- 
- 		if (WARN_ON(dt_hbi != hbi))
- 			pr_warning("vexpress: DT HBI (%x) is not matching "
- 					"hardware (%x)!\n", dt_hbi, hbi);
- 	}
- 
- 	versatile_sched_clock_init(vexpress_get_24mhz_clock_base(), 24000000);
- }
- 
- static const struct of_device_id v2m_dt_bus_match[] __initconst = {
- 	{ .compatible = "simple-bus", },
- 	{ .compatible = "arm,amba-bus", },
- 	{ .compatible = "arm,vexpress,config-bus", },
- 	{}
- };
- 
  static void __init v2m_dt_init(void)
  {
- 	of_platform_populate(NULL, v2m_dt_bus_match, NULL, NULL);
 -	l2x0_of_init(0x00400000, 0xfe0fffff);
+ 	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
  }
  
  static const char * const v2m_dt_match[] __initconst = {
@@@ -442,11 -383,7 +382,9 @@@
  
  DT_MACHINE_START(VEXPRESS_DT, "ARM-Versatile Express")
  	.dt_compat	= v2m_dt_match,
 +	.l2c_aux_val	= 0x00400000,
 +	.l2c_aux_mask	= 0xfe0fffff,
- 	.smp		= smp_ops(vexpress_smp_ops),
+ 	.smp		= smp_ops(vexpress_smp_dt_ops),
  	.smp_init	= smp_init_ops(vexpress_smp_init_ops),
- 	.map_io		= v2m_dt_map_io,
- 	.init_early	= v2m_dt_init_early,
  	.init_machine	= v2m_dt_init,
  MACHINE_END

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2014-05-23  0:45 Stephen Rothwell
  2014-05-23 13:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2014-05-23  0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Thomas Petazzoni, Jason Cooper

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1443 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c between commit 8ae2473d96f1 ("ARM: l2c:
mvebu: convert to generic l2c OF initialisation") from the arm tree and
commit 5686a1e5aa43 ("bus: mvebu: pass the coherency availability
information at init time") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c
index 48169caa56ea,01cfce6ac20b..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/board-v7.c
@@@ -57,8 -75,10 +75,9 @@@ static void __init mvebu_timer_and_clk_
  {
  	of_clk_init(NULL);
  	clocksource_of_init();
+ 	mvebu_scu_enable();
  	coherency_init();
- 	BUG_ON(mvebu_mbus_dt_init());
+ 	BUG_ON(mvebu_mbus_dt_init(coherency_available()));
 -	l2x0_of_init(0, ~0UL);
  
  	if (of_machine_is_compatible("marvell,armada375"))
  		hook_fault_code(16 + 6, armada_375_external_abort_wa, SIGBUS, 0,
@@@ -121,9 -195,8 +196,10 @@@ static const char * const armada_375_dt
  };
  
  DT_MACHINE_START(ARMADA_375_DT, "Marvell Armada 375 (Device Tree)")
 +	.l2c_aux_val	= 0,
 +	.l2c_aux_mask	= ~0,
  	.init_time	= mvebu_timer_and_clk_init,
+ 	.init_machine	= mvebu_dt_init,
  	.restart	= mvebu_restart,
  	.dt_compat	= armada_375_dt_compat,
  MACHINE_END

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2013-08-15  4:36 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-08-15  4:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9060 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/include/debug/highbank.S between commits df917c8c18b4 ("ARM:
debug: provide PL01x debug uart phys/virt address configuration options")
and 5e33abe38413 ("ARM: debug: move PL01X debug include into
arch/arm/include/debug/") from the arm tree and commit 0af6614cb0dd
("ARM: highbank: fix debug uart virtual address for LPAE") from the
arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (the former removed the file, so I did and see below) and
can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
index 2d57da3,1533783..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
@@@ -879,165 -775,41 +879,170 @@@ config DEBUG_LL_INCLUD
  				 DEBUG_IMX53_UART ||\
  				 DEBUG_IMX6Q_UART || \
  				 DEBUG_IMX6SL_UART
 -	default "debug/keystone.S" if DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART0 || \
 -				      DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART1
+ 	default "debug/msm.S" if DEBUG_MSM_UART1 || \
+ 				 DEBUG_MSM_UART2 || \
+ 				 DEBUG_MSM_UART3 || \
+ 				 DEBUG_MSM8660_UART || \
+ 				 DEBUG_MSM8960_UART
 -	default "debug/mvebu.S" if DEBUG_MVEBU_UART || \
 -				   DEBUG_MVEBU_UART_ALTERNATE
 -	default "debug/mxs.S" if DEBUG_IMX23_UART || DEBUG_IMX28_UART
 -	default "debug/nomadik.S" if DEBUG_NOMADIK_UART
 -	default "debug/nspire.S" if 	DEBUG_NSPIRE_CX_UART || \
 -					DEBUG_NSPIRE_CLASSIC_UART
  	default "debug/omap2plus.S" if DEBUG_OMAP2PLUS_UART
 -	default "debug/picoxcell.S" if DEBUG_PICOXCELL_UART
 -	default "debug/pxa.S" if DEBUG_PXA_UART1 || DEBUG_MMP_UART2 || \
 -				 DEBUG_MMP_UART3
 -	default "debug/rockchip.S" if DEBUG_ROCKCHIP_UART
  	default "debug/sirf.S" if DEBUG_SIRFPRIMA2_UART1 || DEBUG_SIRFMARCO_UART1
 -	default "debug/socfpga.S" if DEBUG_SOCFPGA_UART
  	default "debug/sti.S" if DEBUG_STI_UART
 -	default "debug/sunxi.S" if DEBUG_SUNXI_UART0 || DEBUG_SUNXI_UART1
  	default "debug/tegra.S" if DEBUG_TEGRA_UART
 -	default "debug/u300.S" if DEBUG_U300_UART
  	default "debug/ux500.S" if DEBUG_UX500_UART
 -	default "debug/vexpress.S" if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_DETECT || \
 -		DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CA9 || DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_RS1 || \
 -		DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CRX
 +	default "debug/vexpress.S" if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_DETECT
  	default "debug/vt8500.S" if DEBUG_VT8500_UART0
  	default "debug/zynq.S" if DEBUG_ZYNQ_UART0 || DEBUG_ZYNQ_UART1
  	default "mach/debug-macro.S"
  
 +# Compatibility options for PL01x
 +config DEBUG_UART_PL01X
 +	def_bool ARCH_EP93XX || \
 +		ARCH_INTEGRATOR || \
 +		ARCH_SPEAR3XX || \
 +		ARCH_SPEAR6XX || \
 +		ARCH_SPEAR13XX || \
 +		ARCH_VERSATILE
 +
 +# Compatibility options for 8250
 +config DEBUG_UART_8250
 +	def_bool ARCH_DOVE || ARCH_EBSA110 || \
 +		(FOOTBRIDGE && !DEBUG_DC21285_PORT) || \
 +		ARCH_GEMINI || ARCH_IOP13XX || ARCH_IOP32X || \
 +		ARCH_IOP33X || ARCH_IXP4XX || ARCH_KIRKWOOD || \
 +		ARCH_LPC32XX || ARCH_MV78XX0 || ARCH_ORION5X || ARCH_RPC
 +
 +config DEBUG_UART_PHYS
 +	hex "Physical base address of debug UART"
 +	default 0x01c20000 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_DMx_UART0
 +	default 0x01c28000 if DEBUG_SUNXI_UART0
 +	default 0x01c28400 if DEBUG_SUNXI_UART1
 +	default 0x01d0c000 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART1
 +	default 0x01d0d000 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART2
 +	default 0x02530c00 if DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART0
 +	default 0x02531000 if DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART1
 +	default 0x03010fe0 if ARCH_RPC
 +	default 0x08108300 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_TNETV107X_UART1
 +	default 0x10009000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_STD_PORT || DEBUG_CNS3XXX || \
 +				DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CA9
 +	default 0x1010c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
 +	default 0x10124000 if DEBUG_RK3X_UART0
 +	default 0x10126000 if DEBUG_RK3X_UART1
 +	default 0x101f1000 if ARCH_VERSATILE
 +	default 0x101fb000 if DEBUG_NOMADIK_UART
 +	default 0x16000000 if ARCH_INTEGRATOR
 +	default 0x1c090000 if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_RS1
 +	default 0x20060000 if DEBUG_RK29_UART0
 +	default 0x20064000 if DEBUG_RK29_UART1 || DEBUG_RK3X_UART2
 +	default 0x20068000 if DEBUG_RK29_UART2 || DEBUG_RK3X_UART3
 +	default 0x20201000 if DEBUG_BCM2835
 +	default 0x40090000 if ARCH_LPC32XX
 +	default 0x40100000 if DEBUG_PXA_UART1
 +	default 0x42000000 if ARCH_GEMINI
 +	default 0x7c0003f8 if FOOTBRIDGE
 +	default 0x80230000 if DEBUG_PICOXCELL_UART
 +	default 0x80070000 if DEBUG_IMX23_UART
 +	default 0x80074000 if DEBUG_IMX28_UART
 +	default 0x808c0000 if ARCH_EP93XX
 +	default 0x90020000 if DEBUG_NSPIRE_CLASSIC_UART || DEBUG_NSPIRE_CX_UART
 +	default 0xb0090000 if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CRX
 +	default 0xc0013000 if DEBUG_U300_UART
 +	default 0xc8000000 if ARCH_IXP4XX && !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
 +	default 0xc8000003 if ARCH_IXP4XX && CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
 +	default 0xd0000000 if ARCH_SPEAR3XX || ARCH_SPEAR6XX
 +	default 0xd0012000 if DEBUG_MVEBU_UART
 +	default 0xd4017000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART2
 +	default 0xd4018000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART3
 +	default 0xe0000000 if ARCH_SPEAR13XX
 +	default 0xf0000be0 if ARCH_EBSA110
 +	default 0xf1012000 if DEBUG_MVEBU_UART_ALTERNATE
 +	default 0xf1012000 if ARCH_DOVE || ARCH_KIRKWOOD || ARCH_MV78XX0 || \
 +				ARCH_ORION5X
 +	default 0xfe800000 if ARCH_IOP32X
 +	default 0xffc02000 if DEBUG_SOCFPGA_UART
 +	default 0xffd82340 if ARCH_IOP13XX
 +	default 0xfff36000 if DEBUG_HIGHBANK_UART
 +	default 0xfffff700 if ARCH_IOP33X
 +	depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_LL_UART_PL01X || \
 +		DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X
 +
 +config DEBUG_UART_VIRT
 +	hex "Virtual base address of debug UART"
 +	default 0xe0010fe0 if ARCH_RPC
 +	default 0xf0000be0 if ARCH_EBSA110
 +	default 0xf0009000 if DEBUG_CNS3XXX
 +	default 0xf01fb000 if DEBUG_NOMADIK_UART
 +	default 0xf0201000 if DEBUG_BCM2835
 +	default 0xf11f1000 if ARCH_VERSATILE
 +	default 0xf1600000 if ARCH_INTEGRATOR
 +	default 0xf1c28000 if DEBUG_SUNXI_UART0
 +	default 0xf1c28400 if DEBUG_SUNXI_UART1
 +	default 0xf2100000 if DEBUG_PXA_UART1
 +	default 0xf4090000 if ARCH_LPC32XX
 +	default 0xf4200000 if ARCH_GEMINI
 +	default 0xf8009000 if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_CA9
 +	default 0xf8090000 if DEBUG_VEXPRESS_UART0_RS1
 +	default 0xfb009000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_STD_PORT
 +	default 0xfb10c000 if DEBUG_REALVIEW_PB1176_PORT
 +	default 0xfd000000 if ARCH_SPEAR3XX || ARCH_SPEAR6XX
 +	default 0xfd000000 if ARCH_SPEAR13XX
 +	default 0xfd012000 if ARCH_MV78XX0
 +	default 0xfde12000 if ARCH_DOVE
 +	default 0xfe012000 if ARCH_ORION5X
 +	default 0xfe017000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART2
 +	default 0xfe018000 if DEBUG_MMP_UART3
 +	default 0xfe100000 if DEBUG_IMX23_UART || DEBUG_IMX28_UART
 +	default 0xfe230000 if DEBUG_PICOXCELL_UART
 +	default 0xfe800000 if ARCH_IOP32X
 +	default 0xfeb24000 if DEBUG_RK3X_UART0
 +	default 0xfeb26000 if DEBUG_RK3X_UART1
 +	default 0xfeb30c00 if DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART0
 +	default 0xfeb31000 if DEBUG_KEYSTONE_UART1
 +	default 0xfec12000 if DEBUG_MVEBU_UART || DEBUG_MVEBU_UART_ALTERNATE
 +	default 0xfed60000 if DEBUG_RK29_UART0
 +	default 0xfed64000 if DEBUG_RK29_UART1 || DEBUG_RK3X_UART2
 +	default 0xfed68000 if DEBUG_RK29_UART2 || DEBUG_RK3X_UART3
 +	default 0xfec02000 if DEBUG_SOCFPGA_UART
 +	default 0xfec20000 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_DMx_UART0
 +	default 0xfed0c000 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART1
 +	default 0xfed0d000 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART2
 +	default 0xfed12000 if ARCH_KIRKWOOD
 +	default 0xfedc0000 if ARCH_EP93XX
 +	default 0xfee003f8 if FOOTBRIDGE
 +	default 0xfee08300 if DEBUG_DAVINCI_TNETV107X_UART1
 +	default 0xfee20000 if DEBUG_NSPIRE_CLASSIC_UART || DEBUG_NSPIRE_CX_UART
- 	default 0xfee36000 if DEBUG_HIGHBANK_UART
++	default 0xfef36000 if DEBUG_HIGHBANK_UART
 +	default 0xfee82340 if ARCH_IOP13XX
 +	default 0xfef00000 if ARCH_IXP4XX && !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
 +	default 0xfef00003 if ARCH_IXP4XX && CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
 +	default 0xfefff700 if ARCH_IOP33X
 +	default 0xff003000 if DEBUG_U300_UART
 +	default DEBUG_UART_PHYS if !MMU
 +	depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_LL_UART_PL01X || \
 +		DEBUG_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_PL01X
 +
 +config DEBUG_UART_8250_SHIFT
 +	int "Register offset shift for the 8250 debug UART"
 +	depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_8250
 +	default 0 if FOOTBRIDGE || ARCH_IOP32X
 +	default 2
 +
 +config DEBUG_UART_8250_WORD
 +	bool "Use 32-bit accesses for 8250 UART"
 +	depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_8250
 +	depends on DEBUG_UART_8250_SHIFT >= 2
 +	default y if DEBUG_PICOXCELL_UART || DEBUG_SOCFPGA_UART || \
 +		ARCH_KEYSTONE || \
 +		DEBUG_DAVINCI_DMx_UART0 || DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART1 || \
 +		DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART2 || DEBUG_DAVINCI_TNETV107X_UART1
 +
 +config DEBUG_UART_8250_FLOW_CONTROL
 +	bool "Enable flow control for 8250 UART"
 +	depends on DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_8250
 +	default y if ARCH_EBSA110 || FOOTBRIDGE || ARCH_GEMINI || ARCH_RPC
 +
  config DEBUG_UNCOMPRESS
  	bool
- 	depends on ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM
+ 	depends on ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM || ARCH_MSM
  	default y if DEBUG_LL && !DEBUG_OMAP2PLUS_UART && \
  		     !DEBUG_TEGRA_UART
  	help

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2013-05-01  6:44 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2013-05-01  6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Hiroshi Doyu, Stephen Warren, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1923 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-tegra/hotplug.c between commit da2265b130f6 ("ARM: tegra:
remove tegra specific cpu_disable()") from the arm tree and commit
7469688e832e ("ARM: tegra: Unify tegra{20,30,114}_init_early()") from the
arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-tegra/hotplug.c
index e8323bc,8da9f78..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/hotplug.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/hotplug.c
@@@ -12,8 -11,10 +11,9 @@@
  #include <linux/smp.h>
  #include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
  
 -#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
  #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
  
+ #include "fuse.h"
  #include "sleep.h"
  
  static void (*tegra_hotplug_shutdown)(void);
@@@ -46,18 -47,22 +46,13 @@@ void __ref tegra_cpu_die(unsigned int c
  	BUG();
  }
  
- #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
- extern void tegra20_hotplug_shutdown(void);
- void __init tegra20_hotplug_init(void)
 -int tegra_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu)
 -{
 -	/*
 -	 * we don't allow CPU 0 to be shutdown (it is still too special
 -	 * e.g. clock tick interrupts)
 -	 */
 -	return cpu == 0 ? -EPERM : 0;
 -}
 -
+ void __init tegra_hotplug_init(void)
  {
- 	tegra_hotplug_shutdown = tegra20_hotplug_shutdown;
- }
- #endif
+ 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU))
+ 		return;
  
- #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC
- extern void tegra30_hotplug_shutdown(void);
- void __init tegra30_hotplug_init(void)
- {
- 	tegra_hotplug_shutdown = tegra30_hotplug_shutdown;
+ 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC) && tegra_chip_id == TEGRA20)
+ 		tegra_hotplug_shutdown = tegra20_hotplug_shutdown;
+ 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC) && tegra_chip_id == TEGRA30)
+ 		tegra_hotplug_shutdown = tegra30_hotplug_shutdown;
  }
- #endif

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-11-26 10:31 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-11-26 10:39 ` Nicolas Ferre
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Ferre @ 2012-11-26 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, linux-kernel, Russell King

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/26/2012 11:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in 
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c between commit 95e629b761ce 
> ("ARM/AVR32: get rid of serial_at91.h") from the arm tree and
> commit bcd2360c1ff9 ("arm: at91: move platfarm_data to 
> include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> action is required).

Yes, good fix that has to be carried...

Thanks, bye,
- -- 
Nicolas Ferre
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQs0buAAoJEAf03oE53VmQMPgH/0Gynlb5BBImnjSU75mh/dPC
ob/lTJv3w/2gUKPqbOgyxTSmMc9ckFcDELAhFYt+df9hKfOMBzZAUPHLEclZolZ+
AqpnIjGq88TYWMgaREUZ2bigTrzuWKqHiIWV/AoNcz2slhWC//CHK6z9SHE7hZOI
zZFwf326v0dRkm4g785cqalg7pNxQDpE6iMZXuifb8zPWePgKBxqHyPRCbhP1dwu
T4XQ3IgnrvzWcqz/V4mr8kppJXzHNfDEsVZ2XfndhUKVFY4qMGZhFBoTlI6LhNWO
Nu2mD7TaENoKRijLYrdMfidJ65uwAGtEWA6UxEfV1VWVddSsi/D8OuniBta+Ewg=
=zF93
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-11-26 10:31 Stephen Rothwell
  2012-11-26 10:39 ` Nicolas Ferre
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-11-26 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1053 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c between commit 95e629b761ce
("ARM/AVR32: get rid of serial_at91.h") from the arm tree and commit
bcd2360c1ff9 ("arm: at91: move platfarm_data to
include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
index 1a8a271,5660ec2..0000000
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
@@@ -39,13 -39,13 +39,12 @@@
  #include <linux/atmel_pdc.h>
  #include <linux/atmel_serial.h>
  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
+ #include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h>
  
  #include <asm/io.h>
  #include <asm/ioctls.h>
  
- #include <mach/board.h>
- 
 -#include <asm/mach/serial_at91.h>
 -
  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
  #include <mach/cpu.h>
  #include <asm/gpio.h>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-09-27  5:48 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-09-27  5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Jonathan Austin, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1076 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/include/asm/timex.h between commit 56942fec06ef ("ARM: 7538/1:
delay: add registration mechanism for delay timer sources") from the arm
tree and commit 387798b37c8d ("ARM: initial multiplatform support") from
the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/include/asm/timex.h
index 9acc135,963342a..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/timex.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/timex.h
@@@ -12,9 -12,19 +12,13 @@@
  #ifndef _ASMARM_TIMEX_H
  #define _ASMARM_TIMEX_H
  
 -#include <asm/arch_timer.h>
+ #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM
+ #define CLOCK_TICK_RATE 1000000
+ #else
  #include <mach/timex.h>
+ #endif
  
  typedef unsigned long cycles_t;
 -
 -#ifdef ARCH_HAS_READ_CURRENT_TIMER
  #define get_cycles()	({ cycles_t c; read_current_timer(&c) ? 0 : c; })
 -#else
 -#define get_cycles()	(0)
 -#endif
  
  #endif

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-09-20  6:03 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-09-20  7:04 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-09-20  7:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Russell King

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_cp.c between commit 73efd53012af
> ("ARM: 7519/1: integrator: convert platform devices to Device Tree") from
> the arm tree and commit b7a3f8db07c1 ("ARM: integrator: use __iomem
> pointers for MMIO") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

Looks correct!
Thanks.
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-09-20  6:03 Stephen Rothwell
  2012-09-20  7:04 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-09-20  6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Linus Walleij, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1266 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_cp.c between commit 73efd53012af
("ARM: 7519/1: integrator: convert platform devices to Device Tree") from
the arm tree and commit b7a3f8db07c1 ("ARM: integrator: use __iomem
pointers for MMIO") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_cp.c
index f51363e,3df5fc3..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_cp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-integrator/integrator_cp.c
@@@ -55,7 -52,14 +55,7 @@@
  
  #define INTCP_PA_CLCD_BASE		0xc0000000
  
- #define INTCP_VA_CTRL_BASE		IO_ADDRESS(INTEGRATOR_CP_CTL_BASE)
 -#define INTCP_VA_CIC_BASE		__io_address(INTEGRATOR_HDR_BASE + 0x40)
 -#define INTCP_VA_PIC_BASE		__io_address(INTEGRATOR_IC_BASE)
 -#define INTCP_VA_SIC_BASE		__io_address(INTEGRATOR_CP_SIC_BASE)
 -
 -#define INTCP_ETH_SIZE			0x10
 -
+ #define INTCP_VA_CTRL_BASE		__io_address(INTEGRATOR_CP_CTL_BASE)
  #define INTCP_FLASHPROG			0x04
  #define CINTEGRATOR_FLASHPROG_FLVPPEN	(1 << 0)
  #define CINTEGRATOR_FLASHPROG_FLWREN	(1 << 1)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-05-16  8:50 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-05-16  9:36 ` Haojian Zhuang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Haojian Zhuang @ 2012-05-16  9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Russell King

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/Kconfig between commit 98fab064d321 ("ARM: Remove unnecessary
> selection of TICK_ONESHOT") from the arm tree and commit c24b31147a06
> ("ARM: mmp: support DT in irq") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig
> index b1a717c,852b12b..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@@ -627,6 -616,8 +611,7 @@@ config ARCH_MM
>        select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
>        select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>        select GPIO_PXA
> +       select IRQ_DOMAIN
>  -      select TICK_ONESHOT
>        select PLAT_PXA
>        select SPARSE_IRQ
>        select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR

Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-05-16  8:50 Stephen Rothwell
  2012-05-16  9:36 ` Haojian Zhuang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-05-16  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Haojian Zhuang, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 783 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/Kconfig between commit 98fab064d321 ("ARM: Remove unnecessary
selection of TICK_ONESHOT") from the arm tree and commit c24b31147a06
("ARM: mmp: support DT in irq") from the arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig
index b1a717c,852b12b..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@@ -627,6 -616,8 +611,7 @@@ config ARCH_MM
  	select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
  	select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
  	select GPIO_PXA
+ 	select IRQ_DOMAIN
 -	select TICK_ONESHOT
  	select PLAT_PXA
  	select SPARSE_IRQ
  	select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-05-14  8:39 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-05-14  8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Marc Zyngier, Russell King,
	Vaibhav Hiremath, Felipe Balbi, Tony Lindgren

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3419 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/plat-omap/counter_32k.c between commit bd0493eaaf5c ("ARM:
7413/1: move read_{boot,persistent}_clock to the architecture level")
from the arm tree and commit 1fe97c8f6a1d ("ARM: OMAP: Make OMAP
clocksource source selection using kernel param") from the arm-soc tree.

I attempted to fix it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/plat-omap/counter_32k.c
index 44ae077,b2f634b..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/counter_32k.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/counter_32k.c
@@@ -69,55 -69,40 +70,41 @@@ static void omap_read_persistent_clock(
  	*ts = *tsp;
  }
  
- int __init omap_init_clocksource_32k(void)
+ /**
+  * omap_init_clocksource_32k - setup and register counter 32k as a
+  * kernel clocksource
+  * @pbase: base addr of counter_32k module
+  * @size: size of counter_32k to map
+  *
+  * Returns 0 upon success or negative error code upon failure.
+  *
+  */
+ int __init omap_init_clocksource_32k(void __iomem *vbase)
  {
- 	static char err[] __initdata = KERN_ERR
- 			"%s: can't register clocksource!\n";
- 
- 	if (cpu_is_omap16xx() || cpu_class_is_omap2()) {
- 		u32 pbase;
- 		unsigned long size = SZ_4K;
- 		void __iomem *base;
- 		struct clk *sync_32k_ick;
- 
- 		if (cpu_is_omap16xx()) {
- 			pbase = OMAP16XX_TIMER_32K_SYNCHRONIZED;
- 			size = SZ_1K;
- 		} else if (cpu_is_omap2420())
- 			pbase = OMAP2420_32KSYNCT_BASE + 0x10;
- 		else if (cpu_is_omap2430())
- 			pbase = OMAP2430_32KSYNCT_BASE + 0x10;
- 		else if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
- 			pbase = OMAP3430_32KSYNCT_BASE + 0x10;
- 		else if (cpu_is_omap44xx())
- 			pbase = OMAP4430_32KSYNCT_BASE + 0x10;
- 		else
- 			return -ENODEV;
- 
- 		/* For this to work we must have a static mapping in io.c for this area */
- 		base = ioremap(pbase, size);
- 		if (!base)
- 			return -ENODEV;
- 
- 		sync_32k_ick = clk_get(NULL, "omap_32ksync_ick");
- 		if (!IS_ERR(sync_32k_ick))
- 			clk_enable(sync_32k_ick);
- 
- 		timer_32k_base = base;
- 
- 		/*
- 		 * 120000 rough estimate from the calculations in
- 		 * __clocksource_updatefreq_scale.
- 		 */
- 		clocks_calc_mult_shift(&persistent_mult, &persistent_shift,
- 				32768, NSEC_PER_SEC, 120000);
- 
- 		if (clocksource_mmio_init(base, "32k_counter", 32768, 250, 32,
- 					  clocksource_mmio_readl_up))
- 			printk(err, "32k_counter");
- 
- 		setup_sched_clock(omap_32k_read_sched_clock, 32, 32768);
- 		register_persistent_clock(NULL, omap_read_persistent_clock);
+ 	int ret;
+ 
+ 	/*
+ 	 * 32k sync Counter register offset is at 0x10
+ 	 */
+ 	sync32k_cnt_reg = vbase + OMAP2_32KSYNCNT_CR_OFF;
+ 
+ 	/*
+ 	 * 120000 rough estimate from the calculations in
+ 	 * __clocksource_updatefreq_scale.
+ 	 */
+ 	clocks_calc_mult_shift(&persistent_mult, &persistent_shift,
+ 			32768, NSEC_PER_SEC, 120000);
+ 
+ 	ret = clocksource_mmio_init(sync32k_cnt_reg, "32k_counter", 32768,
+ 				250, 32, clocksource_mmio_readl_up);
+ 	if (ret) {
+ 		pr_err("32k_counter: can't register clocksource\n");
+ 		return ret;
  	}
+ 
+ 	setup_sched_clock(omap_32k_read_sched_clock, 32, 32768);
++	register_persistent_clock(NULL, omap_read_persistent_clock);
+ 	pr_info("OMAP clocksource: 32k_counter at 32768 Hz\n");
+ 
  	return 0;
  }

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-05-03  5:35 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-05-03  5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 338 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got conflicts in
arch/arm/mach-ixp2000 and arch/arm/mach-ixp23xx between commits from the
arm tree and commits from the arm-soc tree.

On Russell's advise, I just removed those two directories completely.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-03-16  6:49 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-03-16  8:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-03-16  8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next, linux-kernel,
	Stephen Boyd, Marc Zyngier, Russell King

On Friday 16 March 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c between commit f8e56c42e4e3 ("msm: timer:
> Support sched_clock()") from the arm tree and commit 5ca709c16d0f ("ARM:
> local timers: convert MSM to runtime registration interface") from the
> arm-soc tree.

We've had a few conflicts with localtimer patches already and the
solution might be very different and nonobvious. Stephen B, please
check if linux-next still works for you with localtimer enabled.

The fix does look correct to me though.

> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fax as necessary.

The fax? I think email will do fine ;-)

Thanks Stephen R,

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-03-16  6:49 Stephen Rothwell
  2012-03-16  8:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-16  6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Stephen Boyd, Marc Zyngier, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3692 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c between commit f8e56c42e4e3 ("msm: timer:
Support sched_clock()") from the arm tree and commit 5ca709c16d0f ("ARM:
local timers: convert MSM to runtime registration interface") from the
arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fax as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c
index 61983da,75f4be4..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c
@@@ -128,11 -127,45 +128,50 @@@ static struct clocksource msm_clocksour
  	.flags	= CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS,
  };
  
 +static notrace u32 msm_sched_clock_read(void)
 +{
 +	return msm_clocksource.read(&msm_clocksource);
 +}
 +
+ #ifdef CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS
+ static int __cpuinit msm_local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
+ {
+ 	/* Use existing clock_event for cpu 0 */
+ 	if (!smp_processor_id())
+ 		return 0;
+ 
+ 	writel_relaxed(0, event_base + TIMER_ENABLE);
+ 	writel_relaxed(0, event_base + TIMER_CLEAR);
+ 	writel_relaxed(~0, event_base + TIMER_MATCH_VAL);
+ 	evt->irq = msm_clockevent.irq;
+ 	evt->name = "local_timer";
+ 	evt->features = msm_clockevent.features;
+ 	evt->rating = msm_clockevent.rating;
+ 	evt->set_mode = msm_timer_set_mode;
+ 	evt->set_next_event = msm_timer_set_next_event;
+ 	evt->shift = msm_clockevent.shift;
+ 	evt->mult = div_sc(GPT_HZ, NSEC_PER_SEC, evt->shift);
+ 	evt->max_delta_ns = clockevent_delta2ns(0xf0000000, evt);
+ 	evt->min_delta_ns = clockevent_delta2ns(4, evt);
+ 
+ 	*__this_cpu_ptr(msm_evt.percpu_evt) = evt;
+ 	clockevents_register_device(evt);
+ 	enable_percpu_irq(evt->irq, 0);
+ 	return 0;
+ }
+ 
+ static void msm_local_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *evt)
+ {
+ 	evt->set_mode(CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED, evt);
+ 	disable_percpu_irq(evt->irq);
+ }
+ 
+ static struct local_timer_ops msm_local_timer_ops __cpuinitdata = {
+ 	.setup	= msm_local_timer_setup,
+ 	.stop	= msm_local_timer_stop,
+ };
+ #endif /* CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS */
+ 
  static void __init msm_timer_init(void)
  {
  	struct clock_event_device *ce = &msm_clockevent;
@@@ -195,44 -232,8 +238,10 @@@ err
  	res = clocksource_register_hz(cs, dgt_hz);
  	if (res)
  		pr_err("clocksource_register failed\n");
 +	setup_sched_clock(msm_sched_clock_read,
 +			cpu_is_msm7x01() ? 32 - MSM_DGT_SHIFT : 32, dgt_hz);
  }
  
- #ifdef CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS
- int __cpuinit local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
- {
- 	/* Use existing clock_event for cpu 0 */
- 	if (!smp_processor_id())
- 		return 0;
- 
- 	writel_relaxed(0, event_base + TIMER_ENABLE);
- 	writel_relaxed(0, event_base + TIMER_CLEAR);
- 	writel_relaxed(~0, event_base + TIMER_MATCH_VAL);
- 	evt->irq = msm_clockevent.irq;
- 	evt->name = "local_timer";
- 	evt->features = msm_clockevent.features;
- 	evt->rating = msm_clockevent.rating;
- 	evt->set_mode = msm_timer_set_mode;
- 	evt->set_next_event = msm_timer_set_next_event;
- 	evt->shift = msm_clockevent.shift;
- 	evt->mult = div_sc(GPT_HZ, NSEC_PER_SEC, evt->shift);
- 	evt->max_delta_ns = clockevent_delta2ns(0xf0000000, evt);
- 	evt->min_delta_ns = clockevent_delta2ns(4, evt);
- 
- 	*__this_cpu_ptr(msm_evt.percpu_evt) = evt;
- 	clockevents_register_device(evt);
- 	enable_percpu_irq(evt->irq, 0);
- 	return 0;
- }
- 
- void local_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *evt)
- {
- 	evt->set_mode(CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED, evt);
- 	disable_percpu_irq(evt->irq);
- }
- #endif /* CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS */
- 
  struct sys_timer msm_timer = {
  	.init = msm_timer_init
  };

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-03-15  7:06 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-15  7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Russell King, Magnus Damm,
	Rafael J. Wysocki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1417 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh7377.c between commit 250a27237e0e ("ARM:
shmobile: remove NR_IRQS") from the arm tree and commit bfc46f3ef838
("ARM: mach-shmobile: sh7377 map_io and init_early update") from the
arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh7377.c
index 747ed8e,9f14609..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh7377.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh7377.c
@@@ -30,9 -30,28 +30,29 @@@
  #include <linux/sh_intc.h>
  #include <linux/sh_timer.h>
  #include <mach/hardware.h>
 +#include <mach/irqs.h>
+ #include <mach/common.h>
+ #include <asm/mach/map.h>
  #include <asm/mach-types.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
+ #include <asm/mach/time.h>
+ 
+ static struct map_desc sh7377_io_desc[] __initdata = {
+ 	/* create a 1:1 entity map for 0xe6xxxxxx
+ 	 * used by CPGA, INTC and PFC.
+ 	 */
+ 	{
+ 		.virtual	= 0xe6000000,
+ 		.pfn		= __phys_to_pfn(0xe6000000),
+ 		.length		= 256 << 20,
+ 		.type		= MT_DEVICE_NONSHARED
+ 	},
+ };
+ 
+ void __init sh7377_map_io(void)
+ {
+ 	iotable_init(sh7377_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(sh7377_io_desc));
+ }
  
  /* SCIFA0 */
  static struct plat_sci_port scif0_platform_data = {

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-03-15  7:06 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-15  7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Russell King, Magnus Damm,
	Rafael J. Wysocki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1421 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh7367.c between commit 250a27237e0e ("ARM:
shmobile: remove NR_IRQS") from the arm tree and commit 237caf9e6b0c
("ARM: mach-shmobile: sh7367 map_io and init_early update") from the
arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh7367.c
index 8e848198,a51e1a1..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh7367.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh7367.c
@@@ -29,9 -29,28 +29,29 @@@
  #include <linux/serial_sci.h>
  #include <linux/sh_timer.h>
  #include <mach/hardware.h>
 +#include <mach/irqs.h>
+ #include <mach/common.h>
  #include <asm/mach-types.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
+ #include <asm/mach/map.h>
+ #include <asm/mach/time.h>
+ 
+ static struct map_desc sh7367_io_desc[] __initdata = {
+ 	/* create a 1:1 entity map for 0xe6xxxxxx
+ 	 * used by CPGA, INTC and PFC.
+ 	 */
+ 	{
+ 		.virtual	= 0xe6000000,
+ 		.pfn		= __phys_to_pfn(0xe6000000),
+ 		.length		= 256 << 20,
+ 		.type		= MT_DEVICE_NONSHARED
+ 	},
+ };
+ 
+ void __init sh7367_map_io(void)
+ {
+ 	iotable_init(sh7367_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(sh7367_io_desc));
+ }
  
  /* SCIFA0 */
  static struct plat_sci_port scif0_platform_data = {

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-03-15  6:56 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-15  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Russell King, Magnus Damm,
	Rafael J. Wysocki

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1709 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c between commit 250a27237e0e ("ARM:
shmobile: remove NR_IRQS") from the arm tree and commit d3ab7221489f
("ARM: mach-shmobile: r8a7740 map_io and init_early update") from the
arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c
index fa15d81,74e5234..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7740.c
@@@ -25,9 -25,41 +25,42 @@@
  #include <linux/serial_sci.h>
  #include <linux/sh_timer.h>
  #include <mach/r8a7740.h>
 +#include <mach/irqs.h>
+ #include <mach/common.h>
  #include <asm/mach-types.h>
+ #include <asm/mach/map.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
+ #include <asm/mach/time.h>
+ 
+ static struct map_desc r8a7740_io_desc[] __initdata = {
+ 	 /*
+ 	  * for CPGA/INTC/PFC
+ 	  * 0xe6000000-0xefffffff -> 0xe6000000-0xefffffff
+ 	  */
+ 	{
+ 		.virtual	= 0xe6000000,
+ 		.pfn		= __phys_to_pfn(0xe6000000),
+ 		.length		= 160 << 20,
+ 		.type		= MT_DEVICE_NONSHARED
+ 	},
+ #ifdef CONFIG_CACHE_L2X0
+ 	/*
+ 	 * for l2x0_init()
+ 	 * 0xf0100000-0xf0101000 -> 0xf0002000-0xf0003000
+ 	 */
+ 	{
+ 		.virtual	= 0xf0002000,
+ 		.pfn		= __phys_to_pfn(0xf0100000),
+ 		.length		= PAGE_SIZE,
+ 		.type		= MT_DEVICE_NONSHARED
+ 	},
+ #endif
+ };
+ 
+ void __init r8a7740_map_io(void)
+ {
+ 	iotable_init(r8a7740_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(r8a7740_io_desc));
+ }
  
  /* SCIFA0 */
  static struct plat_sci_port scif0_platform_data = {

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-03-13  8:47 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-13  8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Marc Zyngier

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 537 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/plat-versatile/localtimer.c between commit e9f07fbc5f5b ("ARM:
plat-versatile: convert to twd_local_timer_register() interface") from
the arm tree and commit e129440af638 ("ARM: versatile: Map local timers
using Device Tree when possible") from the arm-soc tree.

I did the obvious thing and removed the file (as the former does), but
there is probably more to be fixed up.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-03-13  8:42 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-13  8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Pawel Moll, Marc Zyngier, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2102 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/ct-ca9x4.c between commit e9f07fbc5f5b ("ARM:
plat-versatile: convert to twd_local_timer_register() interface") from
the arm tree and commit 98ed4ceb93ba ("ARM: vexpress: Get rid of
MMIO_P2V") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-vexpress/ct-ca9x4.c
index b391538,73791f0..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/ct-ca9x4.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/ct-ca9x4.c
@@@ -54,44 -42,17 +42,28 @@@ static struct map_desc ct_ca9x4_io_desc
  static void __init ct_ca9x4_map_io(void)
  {
  	iotable_init(ct_ca9x4_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(ct_ca9x4_io_desc));
 -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS
 -	twd_base = ioremap(A9_MPCORE_TWD, SZ_32);
 -#endif
  }
  
 +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_TWD
 +static DEFINE_TWD_LOCAL_TIMER(twd_local_timer, A9_MPCORE_TWD, IRQ_LOCALTIMER);
 +
 +static void __init ca9x4_twd_init(void)
 +{
 +	int err = twd_local_timer_register(&twd_local_timer);
 +	if (err)
 +		pr_err("twd_local_timer_register failed %d\n", err);
 +}
 +#else
 +#define ca9x4_twd_init()	do {} while(0)
 +#endif
 +
  static void __init ct_ca9x4_init_irq(void)
  {
- 	gic_init(0, 29, MMIO_P2V(A9_MPCORE_GIC_DIST),
- 		 MMIO_P2V(A9_MPCORE_GIC_CPU));
+ 	gic_init(0, 29, ioremap(A9_MPCORE_GIC_DIST, SZ_4K),
+ 		 ioremap(A9_MPCORE_GIC_CPU, SZ_256));
 +	ca9x4_twd_init();
  }
  
- #if 0
- static void __init ct_ca9x4_timer_init(void)
- {
- 	writel(0, MMIO_P2V(CT_CA9X4_TIMER0) + TIMER_CTRL);
- 	writel(0, MMIO_P2V(CT_CA9X4_TIMER1) + TIMER_CTRL);
- 
- 	sp804_clocksource_init(MMIO_P2V(CT_CA9X4_TIMER1), "ct-timer1");
- 	sp804_clockevents_init(MMIO_P2V(CT_CA9X4_TIMER0), IRQ_CT_CA9X4_TIMER0,
- 		"ct-timer0");
- }
- 
- static struct sys_timer ct_ca9x4_timer = {
- 	.init	= ct_ca9x4_timer_init,
- };
- #endif
- 
  static void ct_ca9x4_clcd_enable(struct clcd_fb *fb)
  {
  	v2m_cfg_write(SYS_CFG_MUXFPGA | SYS_CFG_SITE_DB1, 0);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-03-13  8:36 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-03-13  8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Marc Zyngier, Linus Walleij, linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2307 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-ux500/timer.c between commit 8eed6eac103b ("ARM: ux500:
convert to twd_local_timer_register() interface") from the arm tree and
commit b9576623c421 ("ARM: plat-nomadik: get rid of global mtu base
pointer") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-ux500/timer.c
index cadf982,fd00024..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/timer.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/timer.c
@@@ -15,38 -15,22 +15,39 @@@
  #include <mach/setup.h>
  #include <mach/hardware.h>
  
 +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_TWD
 +static DEFINE_TWD_LOCAL_TIMER(u5500_twd_local_timer,
 +			      U5500_TWD_BASE, IRQ_LOCALTIMER);
 +static DEFINE_TWD_LOCAL_TIMER(u8500_twd_local_timer,
 +			      U8500_TWD_BASE, IRQ_LOCALTIMER);
 +
 +static void __init ux500_twd_init(void)
 +{
 +	struct twd_local_timer *twd_local_timer;
 +	int err;
 +
 +	twd_local_timer = cpu_is_u5500() ? &u5500_twd_local_timer :
 +					   &u8500_twd_local_timer;
 +
 +	err = twd_local_timer_register(twd_local_timer);
 +	if (err)
 +		pr_err("twd_local_timer_register failed %d\n", err);
 +}
 +#else
 +#define ux500_twd_init()	do { } while(0)
 +#endif
 +
  static void __init ux500_timer_init(void)
  {
+ 	void __iomem *mtu_timer_base;
  	void __iomem *prcmu_timer_base;
 +	int err;
  
  	if (cpu_is_u5500()) {
- 		mtu_base = __io_address(U5500_MTU0_BASE);
 -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS
 -		twd_base = __io_address(U5500_TWD_BASE);
 -#endif
+ 		mtu_timer_base = __io_address(U5500_MTU0_BASE);
  		prcmu_timer_base = __io_address(U5500_PRCMU_TIMER_3_BASE);
  	} else if (cpu_is_u8500()) {
- 		mtu_base = __io_address(U8500_MTU0_BASE);
 -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS
 -		twd_base = __io_address(U8500_TWD_BASE);
 -#endif
+ 		mtu_timer_base = __io_address(U8500_MTU0_BASE);
  		prcmu_timer_base = __io_address(U8500_PRCMU_TIMER_4_BASE);
  	} else {
  		ux500_unknown_soc();
@@@ -69,9 -53,8 +70,9 @@@
  	 *
  	 */
  
- 	nmdk_timer_init();
+ 	nmdk_timer_init(mtu_timer_base);
  	clksrc_dbx500_prcmu_init(prcmu_timer_base);
 +	ux500_twd_init();
  }
  
  static void ux500_timer_reset(void)

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-02-29  5:16 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-02-29  5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Jett.Zhou, Haojian Zhuang,
	Marc Zyngier, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 825 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/Kconfig between commit 6905a65879b5 ("ARM: Make the sched_clock
framework mandatory") from the arm tree and commit 4a8f83409da6 ("ARM:
sa1100: clean up clock support") from the arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig
index 5130989,9f134c4..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@@ -753,7 -760,8 +753,7 @@@ config ARCH_SA110
  	select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
  	select CPU_FREQ
  	select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
- 	select HAVE_CLK
+ 	select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
 -	select HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK
  	select TICK_ONESHOT
  	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
  	select HAVE_IDE

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-02-09 23:50 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-02-10  0:25 ` Olof Johansson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Olof Johansson @ 2012-02-10  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next, linux-kernel,
	Russell King, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:50:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c between commit fa23e771d863 ("Merge branch
> 'fixes' into for-next") from the arm tree and commit 9918ceafd4a9 ("ARM:
> at91: code removal of CAP9 SoC") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> The latter removes the file, so I did that.

Yep, that's the correct fixup.


Thanks,

-Olof

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-02-09 23:50 Stephen Rothwell
  2012-02-10  0:25 ` Olof Johansson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-02-09 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 399 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c between commit fa23e771d863 ("Merge branch
'fixes' into for-next") from the arm tree and commit 9918ceafd4a9 ("ARM:
at91: code removal of CAP9 SoC") from the arm-soc tree.

The latter removes the file, so I did that.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-01-24  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-24  1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Boojin Kim, Kukjin Kim

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5910 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c between commit 20df8641cc1a ("ARM: amba:
samsung: get rid of NO_IRQ initializers") from the arm tree and commits
2b7841baf665 ("ARM: EXYNOS: Enable MDMA driver") and  bf2f272ad446 ("ARM:
EXYNOS: Support DMA for EXYNOS4X12 SoCs") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (there may be more required - see below) and can carry the
fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c
index 91370de,ce645ba..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/dma.c
@@@ -69,15 -70,60 +70,47 @@@ u8 exynos4210_pdma0_peri[] = 
  	DMACH_AC97_PCMOUT,
  };
  
- struct dma_pl330_platdata exynos4_pdma0_pdata = {
- 	.nr_valid_peri = ARRAY_SIZE(pdma0_peri),
- 	.peri_id = pdma0_peri,
+ u8 exynos4212_pdma0_peri[] = {
+ 	DMACH_PCM0_RX,
+ 	DMACH_PCM0_TX,
+ 	DMACH_PCM2_RX,
+ 	DMACH_PCM2_TX,
+ 	DMACH_MIPI_HSI0,
+ 	DMACH_MIPI_HSI1,
+ 	DMACH_SPI0_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SPI0_TX,
+ 	DMACH_SPI2_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SPI2_TX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S0S_TX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S0_RX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S0_TX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S2_RX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S2_TX,
+ 	DMACH_UART0_RX,
+ 	DMACH_UART0_TX,
+ 	DMACH_UART2_RX,
+ 	DMACH_UART2_TX,
+ 	DMACH_UART4_RX,
+ 	DMACH_UART4_TX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS0_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS0_TX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS2_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS2_TX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS4_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS4_TX,
+ 	DMACH_AC97_MICIN,
+ 	DMACH_AC97_PCMIN,
+ 	DMACH_AC97_PCMOUT,
+ 	DMACH_MIPI_HSI4,
+ 	DMACH_MIPI_HSI5,
  };
  
+ struct dma_pl330_platdata exynos4_pdma0_pdata;
+ 
 -struct amba_device exynos4_device_pdma0 = {
 -	.dev = {
 -		.init_name = "dma-pl330.0",
 -		.dma_mask = &dma_dmamask,
 -		.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
 -		.platform_data = &exynos4_pdma0_pdata,
 -	},
 -	.res = {
 -		.start = EXYNOS4_PA_PDMA0,
 -		.end = EXYNOS4_PA_PDMA0 + SZ_4K,
 -		.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
 -	},
 -	.irq = {IRQ_PDMA0, NO_IRQ},
 -	.periphid = 0x00041330,
 -};
 +AMBA_AHB_DEVICE(exynos4_pdma0, "dma-pl330.0", 0x00041330, EXYNOS4_PA_PDMA0,
 +	{IRQ_PDMA0}, &exynos4_pdma0_pdata);
  
- u8 pdma1_peri[] = {
+ u8 exynos4210_pdma1_peri[] = {
  	DMACH_PCM0_RX,
  	DMACH_PCM0_TX,
  	DMACH_PCM1_RX,
@@@ -105,27 -151,121 +138,108 @@@
  	DMACH_SLIMBUS5_TX,
  };
  
- struct dma_pl330_platdata exynos4_pdma1_pdata = {
- 	.nr_valid_peri = ARRAY_SIZE(pdma1_peri),
- 	.peri_id = pdma1_peri,
+ u8 exynos4212_pdma1_peri[] = {
+ 	DMACH_PCM0_RX,
+ 	DMACH_PCM0_TX,
+ 	DMACH_PCM1_RX,
+ 	DMACH_PCM1_TX,
+ 	DMACH_MIPI_HSI2,
+ 	DMACH_MIPI_HSI3,
+ 	DMACH_SPI1_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SPI1_TX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S0S_TX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S0_RX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S0_TX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S1_RX,
+ 	DMACH_I2S1_TX,
+ 	DMACH_UART0_RX,
+ 	DMACH_UART0_TX,
+ 	DMACH_UART1_RX,
+ 	DMACH_UART1_TX,
+ 	DMACH_UART3_RX,
+ 	DMACH_UART3_TX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS1_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS1_TX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS3_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS3_TX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS5_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS5_TX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS0AUX_RX,
+ 	DMACH_SLIMBUS0AUX_TX,
+ 	DMACH_SPDIF,
+ 	DMACH_MIPI_HSI6,
+ 	DMACH_MIPI_HSI7,
  };
  
+ struct dma_pl330_platdata exynos4_pdma1_pdata;
+ 
 -struct amba_device exynos4_device_pdma1 = {
 -	.dev = {
 -		.init_name = "dma-pl330.1",
 -		.dma_mask = &dma_dmamask,
 -		.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
 -		.platform_data = &exynos4_pdma1_pdata,
 -	},
 -	.res = {
 -		.start = EXYNOS4_PA_PDMA1,
 -		.end = EXYNOS4_PA_PDMA1 + SZ_4K,
 -		.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
 -	},
 -	.irq = {IRQ_PDMA1, NO_IRQ},
 -	.periphid = 0x00041330,
 -};
 +AMBA_AHB_DEVICE(exynos4_pdma1,  "dma-pl330.1", 0x00041330, EXYNOS4_PA_PDMA1,
 +	{IRQ_PDMA1}, &exynos4_pdma1_pdata);
  
+ u8 mdma_peri[] = {
+ 	DMACH_MTOM_0,
+ 	DMACH_MTOM_1,
+ 	DMACH_MTOM_2,
+ 	DMACH_MTOM_3,
+ 	DMACH_MTOM_4,
+ 	DMACH_MTOM_5,
+ 	DMACH_MTOM_6,
+ 	DMACH_MTOM_7,
+ };
+ 
+ struct dma_pl330_platdata exynos4_mdma_pdata = {
+ 	.nr_valid_peri = ARRAY_SIZE(mdma_peri),
+ 	.peri_id = mdma_peri,
+ };
+ 
+ struct amba_device exynos4_device_mdma = {
+ 	.dev = {
+ 		.init_name = "dma-pl330.2",
+ 		.dma_mask = &dma_dmamask,
+ 		.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
+ 		.platform_data = &exynos4_mdma_pdata,
+ 	},
+ 	.res = {
+ 		.start = EXYNOS4_PA_MDMA1,
+ 		.end = EXYNOS4_PA_MDMA1 + SZ_4K,
+ 		.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
+ 	},
 -	.irq = {IRQ_MDMA1, NO_IRQ},
++	.irq = {IRQ_MDMA1},
+ 	.periphid = 0x00041330,
+ };
+ 
  static int __init exynos4_dma_init(void)
  {
  	if (of_have_populated_dt())
  		return 0;
  
+ 	if (soc_is_exynos4210()) {
+ 		exynos4_pdma0_pdata.nr_valid_peri =
+ 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_pdma0_peri);
+ 		exynos4_pdma0_pdata.peri_id = exynos4210_pdma0_peri;
+ 		exynos4_pdma1_pdata.nr_valid_peri =
+ 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_pdma1_peri);
+ 		exynos4_pdma1_pdata.peri_id = exynos4210_pdma1_peri;
+ 	} else if (soc_is_exynos4212() || soc_is_exynos4412()) {
+ 		exynos4_pdma0_pdata.nr_valid_peri =
+ 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4212_pdma0_peri);
+ 		exynos4_pdma0_pdata.peri_id = exynos4212_pdma0_peri;
+ 		exynos4_pdma1_pdata.nr_valid_peri =
+ 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4212_pdma1_peri);
+ 		exynos4_pdma1_pdata.peri_id = exynos4212_pdma1_peri;
+ 	}
+ 
  	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, exynos4_pdma0_pdata.cap_mask);
  	dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, exynos4_pdma0_pdata.cap_mask);
 -	amba_device_register(&exynos4_device_pdma0, &iomem_resource);
 +	amba_device_register(&exynos4_pdma0_device, &iomem_resource);
  
  	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, exynos4_pdma1_pdata.cap_mask);
  	dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, exynos4_pdma1_pdata.cap_mask);
 -	amba_device_register(&exynos4_device_pdma1, &iomem_resource);
 +	amba_device_register(&exynos4_pdma1_device, &iomem_resource);
  
+ 	dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, exynos4_mdma_pdata.cap_mask);
+ 	amba_device_register(&exynos4_device_mdma, &iomem_resource);
+ 
  	return 0;
  }
  arch_initcall(exynos4_dma_init);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-01-07  4:44 ` Shawn Guo
@ 2012-01-07  6:53   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-07  6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shawn Guo
  Cc: Nicolas Pitre, Hui Wang, Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel, linux-next,
	Russell King, Olof Johansson, linux-arm-kernel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1841 bytes --]

Hi Shawn,

On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 12:44:42 +0800 Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:03:45PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > diff --cc arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c
> > index 65139a6,bc17dfe..0000000
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c
> > @@@ -21,9 -22,27 +22,24 @@@
> >   #include <mach/devices-common.h>
> >   #include <mach/iomux-v3.h>
> >   
> > + static struct clk *gpc_dvfs_clk;
> > + 
> >   static void imx5_idle(void)
> >   {
> >  -	if (!need_resched()) {
> >  -		/* gpc clock is needed for SRPG */
> >  -		if (gpc_dvfs_clk == NULL) {
> >  -			gpc_dvfs_clk = clk_get(NULL, "gpc_dvfs");
> >  -			if (IS_ERR(gpc_dvfs_clk))
> >  -				goto err0;
> >  -		}
> >  -		clk_enable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
> >  -		mx5_cpu_lp_set(WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF);
> >  -		if (tzic_enable_wake())
> >  -			goto err1;
> >  -		cpu_do_idle();
> >  -err1:
> >  -		clk_disable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
> > ++	/* gpc clock is needed for SRPG */
> > ++	if (gpc_dvfs_clk == NULL) {
> > ++		gpc_dvfs_clk = clk_get(NULL, "gpc_dvfs");
> > ++		if (IS_ERR(gpc_dvfs_clk))
> > ++			goto err0;
> > + 	}
> > ++	clk_enable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
> >  +	mx5_cpu_lp_set(WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF);
> > ++	if (tzic_enable_wake())
> > ++		goto err1;
> > ++	cpu_do_idle();
> > ++err1:
> > ++	clk_disable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
> > + err0:
> >  -	local_irq_enable();
> 
> This results in a compile error.
> 
>   CC      arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.o
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c: In function ‘imx5_idle’:
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:42:1: error: label at end of compound statement

Ooops.  Sorry about that.  Just remove the label and turn the "goto err0"
into "return".

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-01-07  5:48 ` Shawn Guo
@ 2012-01-07  6:48   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-07  6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shawn Guo
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Hui Wang, Russell King, Nicolas Pitre

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1437 bytes --]

Hi Shawn,

On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 13:48:31 +0800 Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:03:45PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c between commit 9bdd46257ab3 ("ARM: plat-mxc:
> > hook special idle handlers to arm_pm_idle") from the arm tree and commit
> > 010dc8af8f28 ("ARM: mx5: use generic irq chip pm interface for pm
> > functions on") from the arm-soc tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> 
> When I was testing this fix on next-20120106, I spotted another compile
> error from this file.
> 
>   CC      arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.o
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:58:24: error: redefinition of ‘mx50_io_desc’
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:48:24: note: previous definition of ‘mx50_io_desc’ was here
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:48:24: warning: ‘mx50_io_desc’ defined but not used
> 
> The fix could just be removing the duplication.

Yeah, sometimes (I think it has happened to me about 3 times over the
last 2.5 years) both sides of a merge will insert the same function and
git does not notice (they are to far apart or the context is not unique)
and inserts them both as part of the automatic merge.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-01-06  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
  2012-01-07  4:44 ` Shawn Guo
@ 2012-01-07  5:48 ` Shawn Guo
  2012-01-07  6:48   ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2012-01-07  5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Hui Wang, Russell King, Nicolas Pitre

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:03:45PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c between commit 9bdd46257ab3 ("ARM: plat-mxc:
> hook special idle handlers to arm_pm_idle") from the arm tree and commit
> 010dc8af8f28 ("ARM: mx5: use generic irq chip pm interface for pm
> functions on") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Hi Stephen,

When I was testing this fix on next-20120106, I spotted another compile
error from this file.

  CC      arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.o
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:58:24: error: redefinition of ‘mx50_io_desc’
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:48:24: note: previous definition of ‘mx50_io_desc’ was here
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:48:24: warning: ‘mx50_io_desc’ defined but not used

The fix could just be removing the duplication.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn


8<----
@@ -53,16 +54,6 @@ static struct map_desc mx50_io_desc[] __initdata = {
 };

 /*
- * Define the MX50 memory map.
- */
-static struct map_desc mx50_io_desc[] __initdata = {
-       imx_map_entry(MX50, TZIC, MT_DEVICE),
-       imx_map_entry(MX50, SPBA0, MT_DEVICE),
-       imx_map_entry(MX50, AIPS1, MT_DEVICE),
-       imx_map_entry(MX50, AIPS2, MT_DEVICE),
-};
-
-/*

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-01-06  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-01-07  4:44 ` Shawn Guo
  2012-01-07  6:53   ` Stephen Rothwell
  2012-01-07  5:48 ` Shawn Guo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2012-01-07  4:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Hui Wang, Russell King, Nicolas Pitre

Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:03:45PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c
> index 65139a6,bc17dfe..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c
> @@@ -21,9 -22,27 +22,24 @@@
>   #include <mach/devices-common.h>
>   #include <mach/iomux-v3.h>
>   
> + static struct clk *gpc_dvfs_clk;
> + 
>   static void imx5_idle(void)
>   {
>  -	if (!need_resched()) {
>  -		/* gpc clock is needed for SRPG */
>  -		if (gpc_dvfs_clk == NULL) {
>  -			gpc_dvfs_clk = clk_get(NULL, "gpc_dvfs");
>  -			if (IS_ERR(gpc_dvfs_clk))
>  -				goto err0;
>  -		}
>  -		clk_enable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
>  -		mx5_cpu_lp_set(WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF);
>  -		if (tzic_enable_wake())
>  -			goto err1;
>  -		cpu_do_idle();
>  -err1:
>  -		clk_disable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
> ++	/* gpc clock is needed for SRPG */
> ++	if (gpc_dvfs_clk == NULL) {
> ++		gpc_dvfs_clk = clk_get(NULL, "gpc_dvfs");
> ++		if (IS_ERR(gpc_dvfs_clk))
> ++			goto err0;
> + 	}
> ++	clk_enable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
>  +	mx5_cpu_lp_set(WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF);
> ++	if (tzic_enable_wake())
> ++		goto err1;
> ++	cpu_do_idle();
> ++err1:
> ++	clk_disable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
> + err0:
>  -	local_irq_enable();

This results in a compile error.

  CC      arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.o
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c: In function ‘imx5_idle’:
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c:42:1: error: label at end of compound statement

Regards,
Shawn

>   }
>   
>   /*

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-01-06  8:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2012-01-06 10:31   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-06 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King - ARM Linux
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Nicolas Pitre, Govindraj.R, Kevin Hilman

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 728 bytes --]

Hi Russell,

On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:48:41 +0000 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:03:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c between commit e6ab10af962d ("ARM: OMAP:
> > convert idle handlers from pm_idle to arm_pm_idle") from the arm tree and
> > commit 2fd149645eb4 ("") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> Err, there's an empty description of a commit in the arm-soc tree?

Sorry about that:

ARM: OMAP2+: UART: Remove omap_uart_can_sleep and add pm_qos

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2012-01-06  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-01-06  8:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2012-01-06 10:31   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2012-01-06  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Nicolas Pitre, Govindraj.R, Kevin Hilman

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:03:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c between commit e6ab10af962d ("ARM: OMAP:
> convert idle handlers from pm_idle to arm_pm_idle") from the arm tree and
> commit 2fd149645eb4 ("") from the arm-soc tree.

Err, there's an empty description of a commit in the arm-soc tree?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-01-06  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
  2012-01-07  4:44 ` Shawn Guo
  2012-01-07  5:48 ` Shawn Guo
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-06  1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Hui Wang, Shawn Guo, Russell King,
	Nicolas Pitre

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1583 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c between commit 9bdd46257ab3 ("ARM: plat-mxc:
hook special idle handlers to arm_pm_idle") from the arm tree and commit
010dc8af8f28 ("ARM: mx5: use generic irq chip pm interface for pm
functions on") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c
index 65139a6,bc17dfe..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c
@@@ -21,9 -22,27 +22,24 @@@
  #include <mach/devices-common.h>
  #include <mach/iomux-v3.h>
  
+ static struct clk *gpc_dvfs_clk;
+ 
  static void imx5_idle(void)
  {
 -	if (!need_resched()) {
 -		/* gpc clock is needed for SRPG */
 -		if (gpc_dvfs_clk == NULL) {
 -			gpc_dvfs_clk = clk_get(NULL, "gpc_dvfs");
 -			if (IS_ERR(gpc_dvfs_clk))
 -				goto err0;
 -		}
 -		clk_enable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
 -		mx5_cpu_lp_set(WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF);
 -		if (tzic_enable_wake())
 -			goto err1;
 -		cpu_do_idle();
 -err1:
 -		clk_disable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
++	/* gpc clock is needed for SRPG */
++	if (gpc_dvfs_clk == NULL) {
++		gpc_dvfs_clk = clk_get(NULL, "gpc_dvfs");
++		if (IS_ERR(gpc_dvfs_clk))
++			goto err0;
+ 	}
++	clk_enable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
 +	mx5_cpu_lp_set(WAIT_UNCLOCKED_POWER_OFF);
++	if (tzic_enable_wake())
++		goto err1;
++	cpu_do_idle();
++err1:
++	clk_disable(gpc_dvfs_clk);
+ err0:
 -	local_irq_enable();
  }
  
  /*

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-01-06  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-06  1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, Nicolas Pitre

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7245 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got conflicts in
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c, arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c,
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c, arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c and arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c
between commits 1b2073e77894 ("ARM: restart: at91: use new restart hook")
and 8994cb50fee0 ("ARM: mach-at91: move special idle code out of line")
from the arm tree and commit f22deee523e0 ("ARM: at91: make shutdown
controler soc independent") from the arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c
index f1c829f,506a26c..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c
@@@ -13,9 -13,7 +13,8 @@@
   */
  
  #include <linux/module.h>
- #include <linux/pm.h>
  
 +#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
  #include <asm/irq.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
  #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@@ -340,11 -328,16 +335,17 @@@ static void __init at91cap9_map_io(void
  	at91_init_sram(0, AT91CAP9_SRAM_BASE, AT91CAP9_SRAM_SIZE);
  }
  
+ static void __init at91cap9_ioremap_registers(void)
+ {
+ 	at91_ioremap_shdwc(AT91CAP9_BASE_SHDWC);
+ 	at91sam926x_ioremap_pit(AT91CAP9_BASE_PIT);
+ 	at91sam9_ioremap_smc(0, AT91CAP9_BASE_SMC);
+ }
+ 
  static void __init at91cap9_initialize(void)
  {
 -	at91_arch_reset = at91cap9_reset;
 +	arm_pm_idle = at91cap9_idle;
 +	arm_pm_restart = at91cap9_restart;
- 	pm_power_off = at91cap9_poweroff;
  	at91_extern_irq = (1 << AT91CAP9_ID_IRQ0) | (1 << AT91CAP9_ID_IRQ1);
  
  	/* Register GPIO subsystem */

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c
index f2237ac,3a960d2..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c
@@@ -11,9 -11,7 +11,8 @@@
   */
  
  #include <linux/module.h>
- #include <linux/pm.h>
  
 +#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
  #include <asm/irq.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
  #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@@ -326,17 -320,16 +321,23 @@@ static void __init at91sam9260_map_io(v
  	}
  }
  
 +static void at91sam9260_idle(void)
 +{
 +	at91_sys_write(AT91_PMC_SCDR, AT91_PMC_PCK);
 +	cpu_do_idle();
 +}
 +
+ static void __init at91sam9260_ioremap_registers(void)
+ {
+ 	at91_ioremap_shdwc(AT91SAM9260_BASE_SHDWC);
+ 	at91sam926x_ioremap_pit(AT91SAM9260_BASE_PIT);
+ 	at91sam9_ioremap_smc(0, AT91SAM9260_BASE_SMC);
+ }
+ 
  static void __init at91sam9260_initialize(void)
  {
 -	at91_arch_reset = at91sam9_alt_reset;
 +	arm_pm_idle = at91sam9260_idle;
 +	arm_pm_restart = at91sam9_alt_restart;
- 	pm_power_off = at91sam9260_poweroff;
  	at91_extern_irq = (1 << AT91SAM9260_ID_IRQ0) | (1 << AT91SAM9260_ID_IRQ1)
  			| (1 << AT91SAM9260_ID_IRQ2);
  
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c
index 40ac620,a0538c5..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c
@@@ -11,9 -11,7 +11,8 @@@
   */
  
  #include <linux/module.h>
- #include <linux/pm.h>
  
 +#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
  #include <asm/irq.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
  #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@@ -286,17 -278,16 +279,23 @@@ static void __init at91sam9261_map_io(v
  		at91_init_sram(0, AT91SAM9261_SRAM_BASE, AT91SAM9261_SRAM_SIZE);
  }
  
 +static void at91sam9261_idle(void)
 +{
 +	at91_sys_write(AT91_PMC_SCDR, AT91_PMC_PCK);
 +	cpu_do_idle();
 +}
 +
+ static void __init at91sam9261_ioremap_registers(void)
+ {
+ 	at91_ioremap_shdwc(AT91SAM9261_BASE_SHDWC);
+ 	at91sam926x_ioremap_pit(AT91SAM9261_BASE_PIT);
+ 	at91sam9_ioremap_smc(0, AT91SAM9261_BASE_SMC);
+ }
+ 
  static void __init at91sam9261_initialize(void)
  {
 -	at91_arch_reset = at91sam9_alt_reset;
 +	arm_pm_idle = at91sam9261_idle;
 +	arm_pm_restart = at91sam9_alt_restart;
- 	pm_power_off = at91sam9261_poweroff;
  	at91_extern_irq = (1 << AT91SAM9261_ID_IRQ0) | (1 << AT91SAM9261_ID_IRQ1)
  			| (1 << AT91SAM9261_ID_IRQ2);
  
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c
index 5e2485b,5ffbbb0..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c
@@@ -11,9 -11,7 +11,8 @@@
   */
  
  #include <linux/module.h>
- #include <linux/pm.h>
  
 +#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
  #include <asm/irq.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
  #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@@ -304,17 -298,17 +299,24 @@@ static void __init at91sam9263_map_io(v
  	at91_init_sram(1, AT91SAM9263_SRAM1_BASE, AT91SAM9263_SRAM1_SIZE);
  }
  
 +static void at91sam9263_idle(void)
 +{
 +	at91_sys_write(AT91_PMC_SCDR, AT91_PMC_PCK);
 +	cpu_do_idle();
 +}
 +
+ static void __init at91sam9263_ioremap_registers(void)
+ {
+ 	at91_ioremap_shdwc(AT91SAM9263_BASE_SHDWC);
+ 	at91sam926x_ioremap_pit(AT91SAM9263_BASE_PIT);
+ 	at91sam9_ioremap_smc(0, AT91SAM9263_BASE_SMC0);
+ 	at91sam9_ioremap_smc(1, AT91SAM9263_BASE_SMC1);
+ }
+ 
  static void __init at91sam9263_initialize(void)
  {
 -	at91_arch_reset = at91sam9_alt_reset;
 +	arm_pm_idle = at91sam9263_idle;
 +	arm_pm_restart = at91sam9_alt_restart;
- 	pm_power_off = at91sam9263_poweroff;
  	at91_extern_irq = (1 << AT91SAM9263_ID_IRQ0) | (1 << AT91SAM9263_ID_IRQ1);
  
  	/* Register GPIO subsystem */
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
index e3a0f0c,f61eb64..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c
@@@ -344,11 -333,16 +339,17 @@@ static void __init at91sam9g45_map_io(v
  	init_consistent_dma_size(SZ_4M);
  }
  
+ static void __init at91sam9g45_ioremap_registers(void)
+ {
+ 	at91_ioremap_shdwc(AT91SAM9G45_BASE_SHDWC);
+ 	at91sam926x_ioremap_pit(AT91SAM9G45_BASE_PIT);
+ 	at91sam9_ioremap_smc(0, AT91SAM9G45_BASE_SMC);
+ }
+ 
  static void __init at91sam9g45_initialize(void)
  {
 -	at91_arch_reset = at91sam9g45_reset;
 +	arm_pm_idle = at91sam9g45_idle;
 +	arm_pm_restart = at91sam9g45_restart;
- 	pm_power_off = at91sam9g45_poweroff;
  	at91_extern_irq = (1 << AT91SAM9G45_ID_IRQ0);
  
  	/* Register GPIO subsystem */
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c
index 5309b44,96247f6..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c
@@@ -10,9 -10,7 +10,8 @@@
   */
  
  #include <linux/module.h>
- #include <linux/pm.h>
  
 +#include <asm/proc-fns.h>
  #include <asm/irq.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
  #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@@ -291,17 -283,16 +284,23 @@@ static void __init at91sam9rl_map_io(vo
  	at91_init_sram(0, AT91SAM9RL_SRAM_BASE, sram_size);
  }
  
 +static void at91sam9rl_idle(void)
 +{
 +	at91_sys_write(AT91_PMC_SCDR, AT91_PMC_PCK);
 +	cpu_do_idle();
 +}
 +
+ static void __init at91sam9rl_ioremap_registers(void)
+ {
+ 	at91_ioremap_shdwc(AT91SAM9RL_BASE_SHDWC);
+ 	at91sam926x_ioremap_pit(AT91SAM9RL_BASE_PIT);
+ 	at91sam9_ioremap_smc(0, AT91SAM9RL_BASE_SMC);
+ }
+ 
  static void __init at91sam9rl_initialize(void)
  {
 -	at91_arch_reset = at91sam9_alt_reset;
 +	arm_pm_idle = at91sam9rl_idle;
 +	arm_pm_restart = at91sam9_alt_restart;
- 	pm_power_off = at91sam9rl_poweroff;
  	at91_extern_irq = (1 << AT91SAM9RL_ID_IRQ0);
  
  	/* Register GPIO subsystem */

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-01-06  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
  2012-01-06  8:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-06  1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Nicolas Pitre, Russell King,
	Govindraj.R, Kevin Hilman

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1068 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c between commit e6ab10af962d ("ARM: OMAP:
convert idle handlers from pm_idle to arm_pm_idle") from the arm tree and
commit 2fd149645eb4 ("") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index df5c6bf,fc69875..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@@ -485,21 -416,12 +416,11 @@@ void omap_sram_idle(void
  	clkdm_allow_idle(mpu_pwrdm->pwrdm_clkdms[0]);
  }
  
- int omap3_can_sleep(void)
- {
- 	if (!omap_uart_can_sleep())
- 		return 0;
- 	return 1;
- }
- 
  static void omap3_pm_idle(void)
  {
 -	local_irq_disable();
  	local_fiq_disable();
  
- 	if (!omap3_can_sleep())
- 		goto out;
- 
 -	if (omap_irq_pending() || need_resched())
 +	if (omap_irq_pending())
  		goto out;
  
  	trace_power_start(POWER_CSTATE, 1, smp_processor_id());

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-01-05  0:27 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-05  0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Thomas Abraham

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1461 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile between commit cc511b8d84d8 ("ARM: 7257/1:
EXYNOS: introduce arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.[ch]") from the arm tree
and commit fca3de6ab9bf ("ARM: EXYNOS: Limit usage of pl330 device
instance to non-dt build") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
index bcb9efc,db527ab..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile
@@@ -19,8 -19,6 +19,8 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4212)	+= clock-e
  obj-$(CONFIG_PM)		+= pm.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE)		+= cpuidle.o
  
- obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4)	+= dma.o pmu.o
++obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4)	+= pmu.o
 +
  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)		+= platsmp.o headsmp.o
  
  obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_MCT)	+= mct.o
@@@ -46,8 -46,9 +48,10 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_DEV_AHCI)		+= dev-
  obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_DEV_PD)		+= dev-pd.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_DEV_SYSMMU)	+= dev-sysmmu.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_DEV_DWMCI)		+= dev-dwmci.o
+ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_DEV_DMA)		+= dma.o
+ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_DEV_USB_OHCI)	+= dev-ohci.o
  
 +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS4)		+= setup-i2c0.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_FIMC)	+= setup-fimc.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_FIMD0)	+= setup-fimd0.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4_SETUP_I2C1)	+= setup-i2c1.o

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2012-01-02 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-01-02 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Kukjin Kim, Russell King,
	Rajeshwari Shinde, Padmavathi Venna

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2027 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile between commit b024043b6d0d ("ARM: 7245/1:
S3C64XX: introduce arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/common.[ch]") from the arm tree
and commits a60879e7ca17 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Remove SDHCI bus clocks from
platform data"), 875a59374cd1 ("ARM: SAMSUNG: Consolidation of SPI
platform devices to plat-samsung") and 4566c7f7612f ("ARM: S3C64XX:
Modified files for SPI consolidation work") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile
index f37016c,d7d9bb5..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/Makefile
@@@ -27,21 -26,21 +27,20 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_PM)		+= pm.o irq-pm.o slee
  
  obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_DMA)	+= dma.o
  
 -# Device setup
 +# Device support
  
 -obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_I2C0) += setup-i2c0.o
 -obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_I2C1) += setup-i2c1.o
 -obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_IDE) += setup-ide.o
 -obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_KEYPAD) += setup-keypad.o
 -obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_FB_24BPP) += setup-fb-24bpp.o
 -obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_SDHCI_GPIO) += setup-sdhci-gpio.o
 -obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_SPI) += setup-spi.o
 +obj-y				+= dev-uart.o
 +obj-y				+= dev-audio.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_DEV_SPI)	+= dev-spi.o
  
 -# PM
 +# Device setup
  
 -obj-$(CONFIG_PM)		+= pm.o
 -obj-$(CONFIG_PM)		+= sleep.o
 -obj-$(CONFIG_PM)		+= irq-pm.o
 +obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_FB_24BPP)	+= setup-fb-24bpp.o
 +obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_I2C0)	+= setup-i2c0.o
 +obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_I2C1)	+= setup-i2c1.o
 +obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_IDE)		+= setup-ide.o
 +obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_KEYPAD)	+= setup-keypad.o
- obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_SDHCI)	+= setup-sdhci.o
 +obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_SDHCI_GPIO)	+= setup-sdhci-gpio.o
++obj-$(CONFIG_S3C64XX_SETUP_SPI)		+= setup-spi.o
  
  # Machine support
  

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-12-18 23:55 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-12-19  1:32 ` Shawn Guo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-12-19  1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Shawn Guo, Russell King, Richard Zhao

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:55:48AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
Hi Stephen,

> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c between commit 1237f0f6ecf6 ("ARM: 7198/1:
> arm/imx6: add restart support for imx6q") from the arm tree and commit
> 477fce49aef4 ("arm/imx6q-sabrelite: add enet phy ksz9021rn fixup") from
> the arm-soc tree.
> 
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

It looks all right.  Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-12-18 23:55 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-12-19  1:32 ` Shawn Guo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-12-18 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Shawn Guo, Russell King, Richard Zhao

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2584 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c between commit 1237f0f6ecf6 ("ARM: 7198/1:
arm/imx6: add restart support for imx6q") from the arm tree and commit
477fce49aef4 ("arm/imx6q-sabrelite: add enet phy ksz9021rn fixup") from
the arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
index 05b49bb,bee6334..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
@@@ -16,9 -14,10 +16,11 @@@
  #include <linux/irq.h>
  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
  #include <linux/of.h>
 +#include <linux/of_address.h>
  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
+ #include <linux/phy.h>
+ #include <linux/micrel_phy.h>
  #include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
  #include <asm/hardware/gic.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@@ -26,38 -25,27 +28,57 @@@
  #include <mach/common.h>
  #include <mach/hardware.h>
  
 +void imx6q_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
 +{
 +	struct device_node *np;
 +	void __iomem *wdog_base;
 +
 +	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx6q-wdt");
 +	wdog_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
 +	if (!wdog_base)
 +		goto soft;
 +
 +	imx_src_prepare_restart();
 +
 +	/* enable wdog */
 +	writew_relaxed(1 << 2, wdog_base);
 +	/* write twice to ensure the request will not get ignored */
 +	writew_relaxed(1 << 2, wdog_base);
 +
 +	/* wait for reset to assert ... */
 +	mdelay(500);
 +
 +	pr_err("Watchdog reset failed to assert reset\n");
 +
 +	/* delay to allow the serial port to show the message */
 +	mdelay(50);
 +
 +soft:
 +	/* we'll take a jump through zero as a poor second */
 +	soft_restart(0);
 +}
 +
+ /* For imx6q sabrelite board: set KSZ9021RN RGMII pad skew */
+ static int ksz9021rn_phy_fixup(struct phy_device *phydev)
+ {
+ 	/* min rx data delay */
+ 	phy_write(phydev, 0x0b, 0x8105);
+ 	phy_write(phydev, 0x0c, 0x0000);
+ 
+ 	/* max rx/tx clock delay, min rx/tx control delay */
+ 	phy_write(phydev, 0x0b, 0x8104);
+ 	phy_write(phydev, 0x0c, 0xf0f0);
+ 	phy_write(phydev, 0x0b, 0x104);
+ 
+ 	return 0;
+ }
+ 
  static void __init imx6q_init_machine(void)
  {
+ 	if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx6q-sabrelite"))
+ 		phy_register_fixup_for_uid(PHY_ID_KSZ9021, MICREL_PHY_ID_MASK,
+ 					   ksz9021rn_phy_fixup);
+ 
  	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
  
  	imx6q_pm_init();

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-12-18 23:55 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-12-18 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Olof Johansson, Arnd Bergmann, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1498 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8168evm.c between commit fae51fbd5b0b ("ARM:
restart: omap: use new restart hook") from the arm tree and commit
a890b6760d97 ("ARM: OMAP: TI814X: Create board support and enable build
for TI8148 EVM") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8168evm.c
index 74713e3,5b6ad6e..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8168evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ti8168evm.c
@@@ -43,10 -47,19 +47,21 @@@ static void __init ti81xx_evm_init(void
  MACHINE_START(TI8168EVM, "ti8168evm")
  	/* Maintainer: Texas Instruments */
  	.atag_offset	= 0x100,
- 	.map_io		= ti8168_evm_map_io,
- 	.init_early	= ti816x_init_early,
- 	.init_irq	= ti816x_init_irq,
+ 	.map_io		= ti81xx_map_io,
+ 	.init_early	= ti81xx_init_early,
+ 	.init_irq	= ti81xx_init_irq,
+ 	.timer		= &omap3_timer,
+ 	.init_machine	= ti81xx_evm_init,
++	.restart	= omap_prcm_restart,
+ MACHINE_END
+ 
+ MACHINE_START(TI8148EVM, "ti8148evm")
+ 	/* Maintainer: Texas Instruments */
+ 	.atag_offset	= 0x100,
+ 	.map_io		= ti81xx_map_io,
+ 	.init_early	= ti81xx_init_early,
+ 	.init_irq	= ti81xx_init_irq,
  	.timer		= &omap3_timer,
- 	.init_machine	= ti8168_evm_init,
+ 	.init_machine	= ti81xx_evm_init,
 +	.restart	= omap_prcm_restart,
  MACHINE_END

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-11-29  8:06   ` Tomi Valkeinen
@ 2011-12-07 19:28     ` Tony Lindgren
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Tony Lindgren @ 2011-12-07 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tomi Valkeinen
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King

* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> [111128 23:31]:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 19:11 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 November 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/common.h between commit 4e65331c6bb4
> > > ("ARM: 7159/1: OMAP: Introduce local common.h files") from the  tree and
> > > commit 13662dc5b177 ("ARM: OMAP: HWMOD: Unify DSS resets for OMAPs") from
> > > the arm-soc tree.
> > > 
> > > I did the obvious fixup (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > 
> > Your fix looks technically correct, thanks!
> > 
> > Tony, I believe what you actually want here is to move omap_dss_reset
> > into mach-omap2/common.h, right?
> 
> omap_dss_reset will never be used by omap1 boards, so I think
> mach-omap2/common.h would be a good place for it.

Sorry for the delay. Yes mach-omap2/common.h is the way to go. That
comes from Russells devel-stable branch and was needed for the ARM
restart changes.

Tomi, if you need to, you can base your branch on commit
deee6d5359969a0ce4e2760cfd7b9f379bd5698a in Russell's devel-stable
branch.

Regards,

Tony

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-12-06 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-12-07  2:59 ` Shawn Guo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-12-07  2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Dong Aisheng

Hi Stephen,

On 7 December 2011 07:53, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/common.h between commit d4e717535e94
> ("ARM: restart: mxs: use new restart hook") from the arm tree and commit
> 4e1b4ecaa231 ("ARM: mxs: add saif clkmux functions") from the arm-soc
> tree.
>
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

The fix looks right.

Regards,
Shawn

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-12-06 23:52 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-12-07  2:57 ` Shawn Guo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-12-07  2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Lauri Hintsala

Hi Stephen,

On 7 December 2011 07:52, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got conflicts in
> arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-m28evk.c and
> arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-stmp378x_devb.c between commit d4e717535e94 ("ARM:
> restart: mxs: use new restart hook") from the arm tree and commit
> 8d2d2d1d7e96 ("ARM: mxs: fix machines' initializers order") from the
> arm-soc tree.
>
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

The fix looks right.

Regards,
Shawn

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-12-06 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-12-07  2:59 ` Shawn Guo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-12-06 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Dong Aisheng, Shawn Guo

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1004 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/common.h between commit d4e717535e94
("ARM: restart: mxs: use new restart hook") from the arm tree and commit
4e1b4ecaa231 ("ARM: mxs: add saif clkmux functions") from the arm-soc
tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/common.h
index 1388485,3bbb94f..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/common.h
@@@ -16,7 -16,7 +16,8 @@@ struct clk
  extern const u32 *mxs_get_ocotp(void);
  extern int mxs_reset_block(void __iomem *);
  extern void mxs_timer_init(struct clk *, int);
 +extern void mxs_restart(char, const char *);
+ extern int mxs_saif_clkmux_select(unsigned int clkmux);
  
  extern int mx23_register_gpios(void);
  extern int mx23_clocks_init(void);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-12-06 23:52 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-12-07  2:57 ` Shawn Guo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-12-06 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Lauri Hintsala, Shawn Guo

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1461 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got conflicts in
arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-m28evk.c and
arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-stmp378x_devb.c between commit d4e717535e94 ("ARM:
restart: mxs: use new restart hook") from the arm tree and commit
8d2d2d1d7e96 ("ARM: mxs: fix machines' initializers order") from the
arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-m28evk.c
index 7799cd9,6b00577..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-m28evk.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-m28evk.c
@@@ -361,7 -361,6 +361,7 @@@ static struct sys_timer m28evk_timer = 
  MACHINE_START(M28EVK, "DENX M28 EVK")
  	.map_io		= mx28_map_io,
  	.init_irq	= mx28_init_irq,
- 	.init_machine	= m28evk_init,
  	.timer		= &m28evk_timer,
+ 	.init_machine	= m28evk_init,
 +	.restart	= mxs_restart,
  MACHINE_END
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-stmp378x_devb.c
index 857e857,6834dea..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-stmp378x_devb.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-stmp378x_devb.c
@@@ -115,7 -115,6 +115,7 @@@ static struct sys_timer stmp378x_dvb_ti
  MACHINE_START(STMP378X, "STMP378X")
  	.map_io		= mx23_map_io,
  	.init_irq	= mx23_init_irq,
- 	.init_machine	= stmp378x_dvb_init,
  	.timer		= &stmp378x_dvb_timer,
+ 	.init_machine	= stmp378x_dvb_init,
 +	.restart	= mxs_restart,
  MACHINE_END

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-11-28 19:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2011-11-29  8:06   ` Tomi Valkeinen
  2011-12-07 19:28     ` Tony Lindgren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Valkeinen @ 2011-11-29  8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Tony Lindgren, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 815 bytes --]

Hi,

On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 19:11 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 27 November 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/common.h between commit 4e65331c6bb4
> > ("ARM: 7159/1: OMAP: Introduce local common.h files") from the  tree and
> > commit 13662dc5b177 ("ARM: OMAP: HWMOD: Unify DSS resets for OMAPs") from
> > the arm-soc tree.
> > 
> > I did the obvious fixup (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> 
> Your fix looks technically correct, thanks!
> 
> Tony, I believe what you actually want here is to move omap_dss_reset
> into mach-omap2/common.h, right?

omap_dss_reset will never be used by omap1 boards, so I think
mach-omap2/common.h would be a good place for it.

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-11-27 23:56 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-11-28 19:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
  2011-11-29  8:06   ` Tomi Valkeinen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-11-28 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Tony Lindgren, Russell King, Tomi Valkeinen

On Sunday 27 November 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/common.h between commit 4e65331c6bb4
> ("ARM: 7159/1: OMAP: Introduce local common.h files") from the  tree and
> commit 13662dc5b177 ("ARM: OMAP: HWMOD: Unify DSS resets for OMAPs") from
> the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I did the obvious fixup (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Your fix looks technically correct, thanks!

Tony, I believe what you actually want here is to move omap_dss_reset
into mach-omap2/common.h, right?

I guess that I will at some point pull in the first commit from
Russell's stable devel branch, so I can do that fixup instead.

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-11-27 23:56 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-11-28 19:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-11-27 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Tony Lindgren, Russell King, Tomi Valkeinen

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3977 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/common.h between commit 4e65331c6bb4
("ARM: 7159/1: OMAP: Introduce local common.h files") from the  tree and
commit 13662dc5b177 ("ARM: OMAP: HWMOD: Unify DSS resets for OMAPs") from
the arm-soc tree.

I did the obvious fixup (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/common.h
index 346098f,3ff3e36..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/common.h
@@@ -27,12 -27,97 +27,16 @@@
  #ifndef __ARCH_ARM_MACH_OMAP_COMMON_H
  #define __ARCH_ARM_MACH_OMAP_COMMON_H
  
 -#include <linux/delay.h>
 -
  #include <plat/i2c.h>
+ #include <plat/omap_hwmod.h>
  
 -struct sys_timer;
 -
 -extern void omap_map_common_io(void);
 -extern struct sys_timer omap1_timer;
 -extern struct sys_timer omap2_timer;
 -extern struct sys_timer omap3_timer;
 -extern struct sys_timer omap3_secure_timer;
 -extern struct sys_timer omap4_timer;
 -extern bool omap_32k_timer_init(void);
  extern int __init omap_init_clocksource_32k(void);
  extern unsigned long long notrace omap_32k_sched_clock(void);
  
  extern void omap_reserve(void);
+ 
 -void omap2420_init_early(void);
 -void omap2430_init_early(void);
 -void omap3430_init_early(void);
 -void omap35xx_init_early(void);
 -void omap3630_init_early(void);
 -void omap3_init_early(void);	/* Do not use this one */
 -void am35xx_init_early(void);
 -void ti816x_init_early(void);
 -void omap4430_init_early(void);
 -
+ extern int omap_dss_reset(struct omap_hwmod *);
+ 
  void omap_sram_init(void);
  
 -/*
 - * IO bases for various OMAP processors
 - * Except the tap base, rest all the io bases
 - * listed are physical addresses.
 - */
 -struct omap_globals {
 -	u32		class;		/* OMAP class to detect */
 -	void __iomem	*tap;		/* Control module ID code */
 -	void __iomem	*sdrc;           /* SDRAM Controller */
 -	void __iomem	*sms;            /* SDRAM Memory Scheduler */
 -	void __iomem	*ctrl;           /* System Control Module */
 -	void __iomem	*ctrl_pad;	/* PAD Control Module */
 -	void __iomem	*prm;            /* Power and Reset Management */
 -	void __iomem	*cm;             /* Clock Management */
 -	void __iomem	*cm2;
 -};
 -
 -void omap2_set_globals_242x(void);
 -void omap2_set_globals_243x(void);
 -void omap2_set_globals_3xxx(void);
 -void omap2_set_globals_443x(void);
 -void omap2_set_globals_ti816x(void);
 -
 -/* These get called from omap2_set_globals_xxxx(), do not call these */
 -void omap2_set_globals_tap(struct omap_globals *);
 -void omap2_set_globals_sdrc(struct omap_globals *);
 -void omap2_set_globals_control(struct omap_globals *);
 -void omap2_set_globals_prcm(struct omap_globals *);
 -
 -void omap242x_map_io(void);
 -void omap243x_map_io(void);
 -void omap3_map_io(void);
 -void omap4_map_io(void);
 -
 -
 -/**
 - * omap_test_timeout - busy-loop, testing a condition
 - * @cond: condition to test until it evaluates to true
 - * @timeout: maximum number of microseconds in the timeout
 - * @index: loop index (integer)
 - *
 - * Loop waiting for @cond to become true or until at least @timeout
 - * microseconds have passed.  To use, define some integer @index in the
 - * calling code.  After running, if @index == @timeout, then the loop has
 - * timed out.
 - */
 -#define omap_test_timeout(cond, timeout, index)			\
 -({								\
 -	for (index = 0; index < timeout; index++) {		\
 -		if (cond)					\
 -			break;					\
 -		udelay(1);					\
 -	}							\
 -})
 -
 -extern struct device *omap2_get_mpuss_device(void);
 -extern struct device *omap2_get_iva_device(void);
 -extern struct device *omap2_get_l3_device(void);
 -extern struct device *omap4_get_dsp_device(void);
 -
  #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_MACH_OMAP_COMMON_H */

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-11-24 22:25   ` Shawn Guo
@ 2011-11-25 17:08     ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-11-25 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Shawn Guo, Magnus Damm
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Paul Mundt

On Thursday 24 November 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 23:54, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 November 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Arnd,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> >> arch/arm/tools/mach-types between commit bb9b25f923fc ("ARM: Update
> >> mach-types") from the arm tree and commit 9b7c547f7747 ("ARM: Update
> >> mach-types to fix mxs build breakage") from the arm-soc tree.
> >>
> >> The arm tree version is a superset of the arm-soc version, so I used that.
> >
> > Thanks for catching this!
> >
> > Shawn, please make sure that any updates to mach-types go only through
> > Russell's tree. Unfortunately I did not realize that this was out of
> > scope when I merged it, otherwise I would have complained yesterday.
> >
> Sorry if I have misunderstood Russell's comment below.
> 
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/139196/focus=140505
> 
> But I thought he would not send patch on mach-types for -rc series.
> That's why I came up with this patch and sent it to you.  After all,
> we do not want to see mxs build breakage in a release.

What Russell said was that he would not send a full update of
the mach-types file during -rc, because that would remove lots
of (broken) entries and consequently cause build regressions.

He did already send a patch 628e1110 "ARM: Add a few machine types
to mach-types" with a manual update, and normally I'd say your patch
should go the same way.

We also still need to sort out the underlying problem that Russell
mentioned in the thread, which is that he doesn't want to add any 
entries that are not used, while I don't want to add any code that
doesn't build (which a machine definition doesn't without the
mach-types entry).

The best solution I can think of is if I ask people to manually
add a line for their machines when a new one gets added (this
should be getting rarer in the future) and I check that the
line is identical to the one that we get after Russell does the
next update. The main disadvantage with this approach is that
it generates a lot of trivial merge conflicts that the database
was originally meant to avoid.

I also noticed that there is a second missing entry for a board
that Paul Mundt added recently:

$ git grep ^MACHINE_START arch/arm/ | cut -f 2 -d \( | cut -f 1 -d, | \
    while read i ; do 	\
	if ! git grep -qw "$i" arch/arm/tools/mach-types ; then echo $i ; fi ;\
    done
M28EVK
KOTA2

The patch that Magnus did for the KOTA2  mach-types entry is currently
in the same state, waiting for an Ack from Russell.

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-11-24 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2011-11-24 22:25   ` Shawn Guo
  2011-11-25 17:08     ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-11-24 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King

On 24 November 2011 23:54, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 24 November 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>> arch/arm/tools/mach-types between commit bb9b25f923fc ("ARM: Update
>> mach-types") from the arm tree and commit 9b7c547f7747 ("ARM: Update
>> mach-types to fix mxs build breakage") from the arm-soc tree.
>>
>> The arm tree version is a superset of the arm-soc version, so I used that.
>
> Thanks for catching this!
>
> Shawn, please make sure that any updates to mach-types go only through
> Russell's tree. Unfortunately I did not realize that this was out of
> scope when I merged it, otherwise I would have complained yesterday.
>
Sorry if I have misunderstood Russell's comment below.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/139196/focus=140505

But I thought he would not send patch on mach-types for -rc series.
That's why I came up with this patch and sent it to you.  After all,
we do not want to see mxs build breakage in a release.

> Russell, is it ok for you if the patch (see below for reference)
> goes into 3.2-rc4 through the arm-soc tree? I can remove if if you
> think that's better, but I have a lot of fixes stacked on top now
> that I'd prefer not to rebase.
>

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-11-24  0:52 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-11-24 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
  2011-11-24 22:25   ` Shawn Guo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-11-24 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Shawn Guo

On Thursday 24 November 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/tools/mach-types between commit bb9b25f923fc ("ARM: Update
> mach-types") from the arm tree and commit 9b7c547f7747 ("ARM: Update
> mach-types to fix mxs build breakage") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> The arm tree version is a superset of the arm-soc version, so I used that.

Thanks for catching this!

Shawn, please make sure that any updates to mach-types go only through
Russell's tree. Unfortunately I did not realize that this was out of
scope when I merged it, otherwise I would have complained yesterday.

Russell, is it ok for you if the patch (see below for reference)
goes into 3.2-rc4 through the arm-soc tree? I can remove if if you
think that's better, but I have a lot of fixes stacked on top now
that I'd prefer not to rebase.

	Arnd

---
commit 9b7c547f7747991fe62f622698ea1bf470f256f4
Author: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed Nov 16 21:44:33 2011 +0800

    ARM: Update mach-types to fix mxs build breakage
    
    Add entry m28evk to fix the following mxs build breakage.
    
      CHK     include/generated/compile.h
      CC      arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.o
    arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c: In function 'clk_misc_init':
    arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.c:748: error: implicit declaration of
    function 'machine_is_m28evk'
    make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-mxs/clock-mx28.o] Error 1
    make: *** [arch/arm/mach-mxs] Error 2
    
    Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
    Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K<C3><B6>nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

diff --git a/arch/arm/tools/mach-types b/arch/arm/tools/mach-types
index 5bdeef9..ccbe16f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/tools/mach-types
+++ b/arch/arm/tools/mach-types
@@ -1123,5 +1123,6 @@ blissc                    MACH_BLISSC             BLISSC                  3491
 thales_adc             MACH_THALES_ADC         THALES_ADC              3492
 ubisys_p9d_evp         MACH_UBISYS_P9D_EVP     UBISYS_P9D_EVP          3493
 atdgp318               MACH_ATDGP318           ATDGP318                3494
+m28evk                 MACH_M28EVK             M28EVK                  3613
 smdk4212               MACH_SMDK4212           SMDK4212                3638
 smdk4412               MACH_SMDK4412           SMDK4412                3765

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-11-24  0:52 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-11-24 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-11-24  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Shawn Guo

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 463 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/tools/mach-types between commit bb9b25f923fc ("ARM: Update
mach-types") from the arm tree and commit 9b7c547f7747 ("ARM: Update
mach-types to fix mxs build breakage") from the arm-soc tree.

The arm tree version is a superset of the arm-soc version, so I used that.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-11-03  2:22       ` David Brown
@ 2011-11-03 15:10         ` Linus Torvalds
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2011-11-03 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Brown
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Arnd Bergmann, Stephen Boyd, linux-next,
	linux-kernel, Russell King

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:22 PM, David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> I think I'm just going to have to convince our bootloader people to
> actually pass in the right memory information in the first place.

I have to say that it would be a wonderful change of pace to see fixes
at that level instead of the continual horrible platform hacks.

So an enthusiastic "yes please" from me on that subject,

                  Linus

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-11-03  2:09     ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-11-03  2:22       ` David Brown
  2011-11-03 15:10         ` Linus Torvalds
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: David Brown @ 2011-11-03  2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Linus, Stephen Boyd, linux-next, linux-kernel,
	David Brown, Russell King

On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 01:09:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:55:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:18:53 -0700 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > The device tree machine description also needs to have the .fixup and
> > > .reserve callbacks added to it so that the device tree machines boot
> > > properly. Perhaps the soc tree needs to pull in Russell's tree at some
> > > point to resolve this subtle logical conflict or when the trees are
> > > merged together someone will need to do an evil merge and add the
> > > callbacks in the merge commit.
> > 
> > Ah, right.  I have added this merge fixup for today and can carry it as
> > necessary.
> 
> I am still applying this patch to the arm-soc merge.  I assume that it is
> needed in Linus' tree now.

I can look more into this tomorrow.  When I was testing linux-next
last week, the fixups weren't working with device tree anyway, so I
might need to come up with another solution.

The fixups are called with the ATAGS, which aren't available with DT.
The meminfo is passed to the fixup, but it hasn't been initialized
from the old ATAG information, so there isn't anything to fix up.

I think I'm just going to have to convince our bootloader people to
actually pass in the right memory information in the first place.

David

> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:51:48 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] arm-soc: merge fixup for fixup/reserve being added to MACHINE descriptions
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
> index 328df27..4ad2afb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ MACHINE_END
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>  /* TODO: General device tree support for all MSM. */
>  DT_MACHINE_START(MSM_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
> +	.fixup = msm8x60_fixup,
> +	.reserve = msm8x60_reserve,
>  	.map_io = msm8x60_map_io,
>  	.init_irq = msm8x60_init_irq,
>  	.init_machine = msm8x60_dt_init,
> -- 
> 1.7.5.4
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/



-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-09-13  1:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
  2011-09-14 22:58     ` David Brown
@ 2011-11-03  2:09     ` Stephen Rothwell
  2011-11-03  2:22       ` David Brown
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-11-03  2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Linus, Stephen Boyd, linux-next, linux-kernel, David Brown, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1782 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:55:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:18:53 -0700 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > The device tree machine description also needs to have the .fixup and
> > .reserve callbacks added to it so that the device tree machines boot
> > properly. Perhaps the soc tree needs to pull in Russell's tree at some
> > point to resolve this subtle logical conflict or when the trees are
> > merged together someone will need to do an evil merge and add the
> > callbacks in the merge commit.
> 
> Ah, right.  I have added this merge fixup for today and can carry it as
> necessary.

I am still applying this patch to the arm-soc merge.  I assume that it is
needed in Linus' tree now.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:51:48 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] arm-soc: merge fixup for fixup/reserve being added to MACHINE descriptions

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
index 328df27..4ad2afb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ MACHINE_END
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 /* TODO: General device tree support for all MSM. */
 DT_MACHINE_START(MSM_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
+	.fixup = msm8x60_fixup,
+	.reserve = msm8x60_reserve,
 	.map_io = msm8x60_map_io,
 	.init_irq = msm8x60_init_irq,
 	.init_machine = msm8x60_dt_init,
-- 
1.7.5.4


-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-24 20:45 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-10-24 20:51 ` Russell King
  2011-10-25  8:04 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2011-10-25 12:12 ` Marc Zyngier
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2011-10-25 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King,
	Changhwan Youn, Kukjin Kim

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:45:32 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/entry-macro.S between commit
> 292b293ceef2 ("ARM: gic: consolidate PPI handling") from the arm tree and
> commit 3a0622811292 ("ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support MCT PPI for EXYNOS4212")
> from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> Again, I hacked it up (again probably incorrectly - I kept both
> additions).

Here's the patch I've applied to my local copy of next-20111025.
Compile-tested only.

>From bb5510b2bf42bece7f8b27fff05e8841c5832cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:42:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS4: convert MCT to percpu interrupt API

MCT recently gained per cpu interrupts, and missed the fact that
ARM has moved to a genirq based implementation.

This patch converts the driver to the new API.

Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c |   40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c
index f191608..4764c5d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct mct_clock_event_device {
 	char name[10];
 };
 
-struct mct_clock_event_device mct_tick[NR_CPUS];
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mct_clock_event_device, percpu_mct_tick);
 
 static void exynos4_mct_write(unsigned int value, void *addr)
 {
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static void exynos4_mct_tick_start(unsigned long cycles,
 static int exynos4_tick_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
 				       struct clock_event_device *evt)
 {
-	struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = &mct_tick[smp_processor_id()];
+	struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
 
 	exynos4_mct_tick_start(cycles, mevt);
 
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int exynos4_tick_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
 static inline void exynos4_tick_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
 					 struct clock_event_device *evt)
 {
-	struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = &mct_tick[smp_processor_id()];
+	struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
 
 	exynos4_mct_tick_stop(mevt);
 
@@ -376,14 +376,16 @@ static struct irqaction mct_tick1_event_irq = {
 
 static void exynos4_mct_tick_init(struct clock_event_device *evt)
 {
+	struct mct_clock_event_device *mevt;
 	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
-	mct_tick[cpu].evt = evt;
+	mevt = this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_mct_tick);
+	mevt->evt = evt;
 
-	mct_tick[cpu].base = EXYNOS4_MCT_L_BASE(cpu);
-	sprintf(mct_tick[cpu].name, "mct_tick%d", cpu);
+	mevt->base = EXYNOS4_MCT_L_BASE(cpu);
+	sprintf(mevt->name, "mct_tick%d", cpu);
 
-	evt->name = mct_tick[cpu].name;
+	evt->name = mevt->name;
 	evt->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
 	evt->set_next_event = exynos4_tick_set_next_event;
 	evt->set_mode = exynos4_tick_set_mode;
@@ -398,21 +400,21 @@ static void exynos4_mct_tick_init(struct clock_event_device *evt)
 
 	clockevents_register_device(evt);
 
-	exynos4_mct_write(0x1, mct_tick[cpu].base + MCT_L_TCNTB_OFFSET);
+	exynos4_mct_write(0x1, mevt->base + MCT_L_TCNTB_OFFSET);
 
 	if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_SPI) {
 		if (cpu == 0) {
-			mct_tick0_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
+			mct_tick0_event_irq.dev_id = mevt;
 			evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L0;
 			setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L0, &mct_tick0_event_irq);
 		} else {
-			mct_tick1_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
+			mct_tick1_event_irq.dev_id = mevt;
 			evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L1;
 			setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L1, &mct_tick1_event_irq);
 			irq_set_affinity(IRQ_MCT_L1, cpumask_of(1));
 		}
 	} else {
-		gic_enable_ppi(IRQ_MCT_LOCALTIMER);
+		enable_percpu_irq(IRQ_MCT_LOCALTIMER, 0);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -427,9 +429,11 @@ int __cpuinit local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
 void local_timer_stop(struct clock_event_device *evt)
 {
 	evt->set_mode(CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED, evt);
-	disable_irq(evt->irq);
+	if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_SPI)
+		disable_irq(evt->irq);
+	else
+		disable_percpu_irq(IRQ_MCT_LOCALTIMER);
 }
-
 #endif /* CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS */
 
 static void __init exynos4_timer_resources(void)
@@ -438,6 +442,16 @@ static void __init exynos4_timer_resources(void)
 	mct_clk = clk_get(NULL, "xtal");
 
 	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(mct_clk);
+
+	if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_PPI) {
+		int err;
+
+		err = request_percpu_irq(IRQ_MCT_LOCALTIMER,
+					 exynos4_mct_tick_isr, "MCT",
+					 &percpu_mct_tick);
+		WARN(err, "MCT: can't request IRQ %d (%d)\n",
+		     IRQ_MCT_LOCALTIMER, err);
+	}		
 }
 
 static void __init exynos4_timer_init(void)
-- 
1.7.7


-- 
I'm the slime oozin' out from your TV set...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-24 20:45 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-10-24 20:51 ` Russell King
@ 2011-10-25  8:04 ` Marc Zyngier
  2011-10-25 12:12 ` Marc Zyngier
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2011-10-25  8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Changhwan Youn

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 07:45:32 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/entry-macro.S between commit
> 292b293ceef2 ("ARM: gic: consolidate PPI handling") from the arm tree and
> commit 3a0622811292 ("ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support MCT PPI for EXYNOS4212")
> from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> Again, I hacked it up (again probably incorrectly - I kept both
> additions).

I'll cook a patch for this shortly.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
I'm the slime oozin' out from your TV set...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-24 21:09   ` Sascha Hauer
@ 2011-10-24 21:16     ` Russell King
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2011-10-24 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sascha Hauer
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Nicolas Pitre

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:09:52PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:30:41PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:20:13AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Arnd,
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/memory.h between commit c039bad00f21
> > > ("ARM: plat-mxc: remove mach/memory.h") from the arm tree and commits
> > > ae4fa7f66e54 ("ARM i.MX: allow to compile together ARMv4 and ARMv5 based
> > > SoCs") and 7409cd1cd554 ("ARM i.MX: allow to compile together all i.MX5
> > > based SoCs") from the arm-soc tree.
> > > 
> > > The former removed the file, so I did that.
> > 
> > Stephen - thanks.
> > 
> > ARM guys, we need to be smarter about this stuff - if we're consolidating
> > code across the ARM tree, committing changes to files which we're going
> > to remove really isn't a good idea.  It probably means something else has
> > changed elsewhere to accomodate the deletion of the file, which this
> > kind of resolution won't fix up.
> 
> In this case deleting the file is the correct solution. I removed some
> definitions of PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET which got unused due to "ARM i.MX: allow
> to compile together..." and Nicolas removed the need for PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET
> at all.

Ok, at least this one is trivial.  Thanks for the confirmation.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-24 20:30 ` Russell King
@ 2011-10-24 21:09   ` Sascha Hauer
  2011-10-24 21:16     ` Russell King
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Sascha Hauer @ 2011-10-24 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Nicolas Pitre

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:30:41PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:20:13AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/memory.h between commit c039bad00f21
> > ("ARM: plat-mxc: remove mach/memory.h") from the arm tree and commits
> > ae4fa7f66e54 ("ARM i.MX: allow to compile together ARMv4 and ARMv5 based
> > SoCs") and 7409cd1cd554 ("ARM i.MX: allow to compile together all i.MX5
> > based SoCs") from the arm-soc tree.
> > 
> > The former removed the file, so I did that.
> 
> Stephen - thanks.
> 
> ARM guys, we need to be smarter about this stuff - if we're consolidating
> code across the ARM tree, committing changes to files which we're going
> to remove really isn't a good idea.  It probably means something else has
> changed elsewhere to accomodate the deletion of the file, which this
> kind of resolution won't fix up.

In this case deleting the file is the correct solution. I removed some
definitions of PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET which got unused due to "ARM i.MX: allow
to compile together..." and Nicolas removed the need for PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET
at all.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-24 20:48 ` Russell King
@ 2011-10-24 21:08   ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-10-24 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King, Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Marc Zyngier

On 10/24/2011 03:48 PM, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:39:46AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>> arch/arm/common/gic.c between commits 292b293ceef2 ("ARM: gic:
>> consolidate PPI handling") and 28af690a284d ("ARM: gic, local timers: use
>> the request_percpu_irq() interface") from the arm tree and commits
>> 2071a2a4b8ed ("ARM: gic: add irq_domain support") and e3f14d321b34 ("ARM:
>> gic: add OF based initialization") from the arm-soc tree.
>>
>> I hacked it up (almost certainly incorrectly - see below). Someone will
>> have to provide Linus with a fix for this.
> 
> Yes, this looks quite wrong:
> 
>> @@@ -332,29 -304,12 +325,22 @@@
>>   		writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
>>   
>>   	/*
>> - 	 * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
>> - 	 */
>> - 	irq_limit = gic->irq_offset + gic_irqs;
>> - 	if (WARN_ON(irq_limit > NR_IRQS))
>> - 		irq_limit = NR_IRQS;
>> - 
>> - 	/*
>>   	 * Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
>>   	 */
>>  +	for (i = 0; i < nrppis; i++) {
>>  +		int ppi = i + ppi_base;
>>  +
>>  +		irq_set_percpu_devid(ppi);
>>  +		irq_set_chip_and_handler(ppi, &gic_chip,
>>  +					 handle_percpu_devid_irq);
>>  +		irq_set_chip_data(ppi, gic);
>>  +		set_irq_flags(ppi, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_NOAUTOEN);
>>  +	}
>>  +
>> - 	for (i = irq_start + nrppis; i < irq_limit; i++) {
>> - 		irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
>> - 		irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
>> - 		set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
>> + 	irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, i, irq) {
>> + 		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
>> + 		irq_set_chip_data(irq, gic);
>> + 		set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> 
> We definitely need to sort this out before either tree gets pushed to
> Linus, otherwise we're going to end up annoying Linus... even if we
> provide a resolution.
> 
> I suspect I should've taken the GIC OF stuff via my tree...

Yes, as it turns out to be pretty dependent on your tree.

I'm testing the fix for this and will send a new pull request.

Rob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-10-24 20:52 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-10-24 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Marc Zyngier, Russell King, Changhwan Youn

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1629 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c between commit 28af690a284d ("ARM: gic, local
timers: use the request_percpu_irq() interface") from the arm tree and
commit 3a0622811292 ("ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support MCT PPI for EXYNOS4212")
from the arm-soc tree.

I hacked it up (probably incorrectly - see below and dropping the
local_timer_ack() change from the latter, since the former removed that
function).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c
index 582b874,eb182f2..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mct.c
@@@ -384,15 -400,17 +400,19 @@@ static void exynos4_mct_tick_init(struc
  
  	exynos4_mct_write(0x1, mct_tick[cpu].base + MCT_L_TCNTB_OFFSET);
  
- 	if (cpu == 0) {
- 		mct_tick0_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
- 		evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L0;
- 		setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L0, &mct_tick0_event_irq);
+ 	if (mct_int_type == MCT_INT_SPI) {
+ 		if (cpu == 0) {
+ 			mct_tick0_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
++			evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L0;
+ 			setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L0, &mct_tick0_event_irq);
+ 		} else {
+ 			mct_tick1_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
++			evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L1;
+ 			setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L1, &mct_tick1_event_irq);
+ 			irq_set_affinity(IRQ_MCT_L1, cpumask_of(1));
+ 		}
  	} else {
- 		mct_tick1_event_irq.dev_id = &mct_tick[cpu];
- 		evt->irq = IRQ_MCT_L1;
- 		setup_irq(IRQ_MCT_L1, &mct_tick1_event_irq);
- 		irq_set_affinity(IRQ_MCT_L1, cpumask_of(1));
+ 		gic_enable_ppi(IRQ_MCT_LOCALTIMER);
  	}
  }
  

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-24 20:45 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-10-24 20:51 ` Russell King
  2011-10-25  8:04 ` Marc Zyngier
  2011-10-25 12:12 ` Marc Zyngier
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2011-10-24 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Thomas Glexiner
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Marc Zyngier, Changhwan Youn

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:45:32AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/entry-macro.S between commit
> 292b293ceef2 ("ARM: gic: consolidate PPI handling") from the arm tree and
> commit 3a0622811292 ("ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support MCT PPI for EXYNOS4212")
> from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> Again, I hacked it up (again probably incorrectly - I kept both
> additions).

Argh, noooo, not another conflict.

It looks like merging the PPI stuff was a bad move (despite pressure from
tglx to do so.)  Unfortunately, it's in my published stable branch so it
can't be dropped.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-24 20:39 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-10-24 20:48 ` Russell King
  2011-10-24 21:08   ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2011-10-24 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Marc Zyngier

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:39:46AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/common/gic.c between commits 292b293ceef2 ("ARM: gic:
> consolidate PPI handling") and 28af690a284d ("ARM: gic, local timers: use
> the request_percpu_irq() interface") from the arm tree and commits
> 2071a2a4b8ed ("ARM: gic: add irq_domain support") and e3f14d321b34 ("ARM:
> gic: add OF based initialization") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> I hacked it up (almost certainly incorrectly - see below). Someone will
> have to provide Linus with a fix for this.

Yes, this looks quite wrong:

> @@@ -332,29 -304,12 +325,22 @@@
>   		writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
>   
>   	/*
> - 	 * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
> - 	 */
> - 	irq_limit = gic->irq_offset + gic_irqs;
> - 	if (WARN_ON(irq_limit > NR_IRQS))
> - 		irq_limit = NR_IRQS;
> - 
> - 	/*
>   	 * Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
>   	 */
>  +	for (i = 0; i < nrppis; i++) {
>  +		int ppi = i + ppi_base;
>  +
>  +		irq_set_percpu_devid(ppi);
>  +		irq_set_chip_and_handler(ppi, &gic_chip,
>  +					 handle_percpu_devid_irq);
>  +		irq_set_chip_data(ppi, gic);
>  +		set_irq_flags(ppi, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_NOAUTOEN);
>  +	}
>  +
> - 	for (i = irq_start + nrppis; i < irq_limit; i++) {
> - 		irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> - 		irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
> - 		set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
> + 	irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, i, irq) {
> + 		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> + 		irq_set_chip_data(irq, gic);
> + 		set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
>   	}
>   
>   	writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);

We definitely need to sort this out before either tree gets pushed to
Linus, otherwise we're going to end up annoying Linus... even if we
provide a resolution.

I suspect I should've taken the GIC OF stuff via my tree...

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-10-24 20:45 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-10-24 20:51 ` Russell King
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-10-24 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Marc Zyngier, Russell King, Changhwan Youn

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 466 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/include/mach/entry-macro.S between commit
292b293ceef2 ("ARM: gic: consolidate PPI handling") from the arm tree and
commit 3a0622811292 ("ARM: EXYNOS4: Add support MCT PPI for EXYNOS4212")
from the arm-soc tree.

Again, I hacked it up (again probably incorrectly - I kept both
additions).
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-10-24 20:39 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-10-24 20:48 ` Russell King
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-10-24 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Rob Herring, Russell King, Marc Zyngier

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3774 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/common/gic.c between commits 292b293ceef2 ("ARM: gic:
consolidate PPI handling") and 28af690a284d ("ARM: gic, local timers: use
the request_percpu_irq() interface") from the arm tree and commits
2071a2a4b8ed ("ARM: gic: add irq_domain support") and e3f14d321b34 ("ARM:
gic: add OF based initialization") from the arm-soc tree.

I hacked it up (almost certainly incorrectly - see below). Someone will
have to provide Linus with a fix for this.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/common/gic.c
index 016c1ae,65cf39d..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@@ -29,9 -29,10 +29,13 @@@
  #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
  #include <linux/io.h>
 +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
 +#include <linux/percpu.h>
 +#include <linux/slab.h>
+ #include <linux/of.h>
+ #include <linux/of_address.h>
+ #include <linux/of_irq.h>
+ #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
  
  #include <asm/irq.h>
  #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
@@@ -259,14 -259,14 +262,15 @@@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned in
  	irq_set_chained_handler(irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq);
  }
  
- static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
- 	unsigned int irq_start)
+ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
  {
- 	unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;
+ 	unsigned int i, irq;
  	u32 cpumask;
+ 	unsigned int gic_irqs = gic->gic_irqs;
+ 	struct irq_domain *domain = &gic->domain;
  	void __iomem *base = gic->dist_base;
  	u32 cpu = 0;
 +	u32 nrppis = 0, ppi_base = 0;
  
  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
  	cpu = cpu_logical_map(smp_processor_id());
@@@ -279,34 -279,6 +283,23 @@@
  	writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
  
  	/*
- 	 * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
- 	 * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
- 	 */
- 	gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
- 	gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
- 	if (gic_irqs > 1020)
- 		gic_irqs = 1020;
- 
- 	gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
- 
- 	/*
 +	 * Nobody would be insane enough to use PPIs on a secondary
 +	 * GIC, right?
 +	 */
 +	if (gic == &gic_data[0]) {
 +		nrppis = (32 - irq_start) & 31;
 +
 +		/* The GIC only supports up to 16 PPIs. */
 +		if (nrppis > 16)
 +			BUG();
 +
 +		ppi_base = gic->irq_offset + 32 - nrppis;
 +	}
 +
 +	pr_info("Configuring GIC with %d sources (%d PPIs)\n",
 +		gic_irqs, (gic == &gic_data[0]) ? nrppis : 0);
 +
 +	/*
  	 * Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low.
  	 */
  	for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 16)
@@@ -332,29 -304,12 +325,22 @@@
  		writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
  
  	/*
- 	 * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
- 	 */
- 	irq_limit = gic->irq_offset + gic_irqs;
- 	if (WARN_ON(irq_limit > NR_IRQS))
- 		irq_limit = NR_IRQS;
- 
- 	/*
  	 * Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
  	 */
 +	for (i = 0; i < nrppis; i++) {
 +		int ppi = i + ppi_base;
 +
 +		irq_set_percpu_devid(ppi);
 +		irq_set_chip_and_handler(ppi, &gic_chip,
 +					 handle_percpu_devid_irq);
 +		irq_set_chip_data(ppi, gic);
 +		set_irq_flags(ppi, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_NOAUTOEN);
 +	}
 +
- 	for (i = irq_start + nrppis; i < irq_limit; i++) {
- 		irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
- 		irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
- 		set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+ 	irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, i, irq) {
+ 		irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
+ 		irq_set_chip_data(irq, gic);
+ 		set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
  	}
  
  	writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-24 20:20 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-10-24 20:30 ` Russell King
  2011-10-24 21:09   ` Sascha Hauer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2011-10-24 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Nicolas Pitre, Sascha Hauer

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:20:13AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/memory.h between commit c039bad00f21
> ("ARM: plat-mxc: remove mach/memory.h") from the arm tree and commits
> ae4fa7f66e54 ("ARM i.MX: allow to compile together ARMv4 and ARMv5 based
> SoCs") and 7409cd1cd554 ("ARM i.MX: allow to compile together all i.MX5
> based SoCs") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> The former removed the file, so I did that.

Stephen - thanks.

ARM guys, we need to be smarter about this stuff - if we're consolidating
code across the ARM tree, committing changes to files which we're going
to remove really isn't a good idea.  It probably means something else has
changed elsewhere to accomodate the deletion of the file, which this
kind of resolution won't fix up.

It's a recipe for creating unnecessary build failures when these trees
get merged together.

It probably means that those two commits need to be postponed and
updated for the changes already queued by other people.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-10-24 20:20 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-10-24 20:30 ` Russell King
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-10-24 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Nicolas Pitre, Sascha Hauer

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 554 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/memory.h between commit c039bad00f21
("ARM: plat-mxc: remove mach/memory.h") from the arm tree and commits
ae4fa7f66e54 ("ARM i.MX: allow to compile together ARMv4 and ARMv5 based
SoCs") and 7409cd1cd554 ("ARM i.MX: allow to compile together all i.MX5
based SoCs") from the arm-soc tree.

The former removed the file, so I did that.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-13  0:11 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-10-13  0:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-10-13  0:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Nicolas Pitre, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 996 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:11:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/Kconfig between commit d0ee9f404f42 ("ARM: limit CONFIG_HAVE_IDE
> to platforms that do") from the arm tree and commit 06a4eada6a73 ("ARM:
> switch from NO_MACH_MEMORY_H to NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H") from the arm-soc
> tree.
> 
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

This also affected arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
index 5b605a9,6d49d2f1d..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig
@@@ -14,7 -14,7 +14,8 @@@ config ARCH_OMAP
  	select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
  	select CLKSRC_MMIO
  	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
 +	select HAVE_IDE
+ 	select HAVE_MACH_MEMORY_H
  	help
  	  "Systems based on omap7xx, omap15xx or omap16xx"
  

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-10-13  0:15 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-10-13  0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Sascha Hauer, Russell King, Nicolas Pitre

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 532 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Makefile.boot between commit 86783a0c544d ("ARM:
7022/1: allow to detect conflicting zreladdrs") from the arm tree and
commit 758ab7e2046d ("ARM: mach-ep93xx: remove mach/memory.h and Kconfig
selection of SDRAM bank") from the arm-soc tree.

The latter commit just emptied the file (without deleteing it), so I did
that.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-10-13  0:11 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-10-13  0:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-10-13  0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Nicolas Pitre, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2508 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/Kconfig between commit d0ee9f404f42 ("ARM: limit CONFIG_HAVE_IDE
to platforms that do") from the arm tree and commit 06a4eada6a73 ("ARM:
switch from NO_MACH_MEMORY_H to NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H") from the arm-soc
tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig
index bb2b5ba,c1c9dc0..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@@ -212,11 -212,20 +212,24 @@@ config ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIR
  	  this feature (eg, building a kernel for a single machine) and
  	  you need to shrink the kernel to the minimal size.
  
+ config NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H
+ 	bool
+ 	help
+ 	  Select this when mach/memory.h is required to provide special
+ 	  definitions for this platform.  The need for mach/memory.h should
+ 	  be avoided when possible.
+ 
+ config PHYS_OFFSET
+ 	hex "Physical address of main memory"
+ 	depends on !ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT && !NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H
+ 	help
+ 	  Please provide the physical address corresponding to the
+ 	  location of main memory in your system.
  
 +config GENERIC_BUG
 +	def_bool y
 +	depends on BUG
 +
  source "init/Kconfig"
  
  source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer"
@@@ -386,7 -400,7 +404,8 @@@ config ARCH_FOOTBRIDG
  	select CPU_SA110
  	select FOOTBRIDGE
  	select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
 +	select HAVE_IDE
+ 	select NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H
  	help
  	  Support for systems based on the DC21285 companion chip
  	  ("FootBridge"), such as the Simtec CATS and the Rebel NetWinder.
@@@ -675,7 -703,7 +710,8 @@@ config ARCH_RP
  	select NO_IOPORT
  	select ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
  	select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
 +	select HAVE_IDE
+ 	select NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H
  	help
  	  On the Acorn Risc-PC, Linux can support the internal IDE disk and
  	  CD-ROM interface, serial and parallel port, and the floppy drive.
@@@ -694,7 -722,7 +730,8 @@@ config ARCH_SA110
  	select HAVE_SCHED_CLOCK
  	select TICK_ONESHOT
  	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
 +	select HAVE_IDE
+ 	select NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H
  	help
  	  Support for StrongARM 11x0 based boards.
  
@@@ -841,7 -873,7 +882,8 @@@ config ARCH_U30
  	select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
  	select HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV
  	select GENERIC_GPIO
 +	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
+ 	select NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H
  	help
  	  Support for ST-Ericsson U300 series mobile platforms.
  

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-04 15:48 ` Stephen Warren
@ 2011-10-04 19:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-10-04 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Warren
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Olof Johansson

On Tuesday 04 October 2011 08:48:33 Stephen Warren wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote at Monday, October 03, 2011 6:09 PM:
> > Hi Arnd,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-seaboard.h between commit ea5abbd215b7 ("ARM:
> > 7101/1: arm/tegra: Replace <mach/gpio.h> with <mach/gpio-tegra.h>") from
> > the arm tree and commit a697e694aeb8 ("ARM: Tegra: Seaboard board updates
> > for audio") from the arm-soc tree.
> > 
> > Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
> 
> Both this and the similar fixup in the other email look fine to me.
> 
> For my education, how does this get resolved; presumably neither Russell's
> tree nor arm-soc can take a patch that fixes this right now, so does one of
> the trees get rebased after the merge of the other but before being pulled
> by Linus, or does Linus do this merge fixup when he pulls?
> 
> Thanks for cluing me in!

Stephen resolves it using git rerere for now, which automatically remembers
the fix. When I start sending patches to Linus, I have the choice to
either do the fixup myself or let Linus do it.

Linus generally wants to see the conflicts and fix them on his own, so that
is the default. If there are complicated merges, I provide another branch
that has the solution so he can compare it with the solution he came up with,
or just take it.

Last time, there was one pull request I sent to Linus that had lots of trivial
conflicts with another branch that I also sent him. Given the same situation,
I would probably just do the merge before I send the pull request.

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* RE: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-10-04  0:08 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-10-04 15:48 ` Stephen Warren
  2011-10-04 19:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Warren @ 2011-10-04 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Olof Johansson

Stephen Rothwell wrote at Monday, October 03, 2011 6:09 PM:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-seaboard.h between commit ea5abbd215b7 ("ARM:
> 7101/1: arm/tegra: Replace <mach/gpio.h> with <mach/gpio-tegra.h>") from
> the arm tree and commit a697e694aeb8 ("ARM: Tegra: Seaboard board updates
> for audio") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

Both this and the similar fixup in the other email look fine to me.

For my education, how does this get resolved; presumably neither Russell's
tree nor arm-soc can take a patch that fixes this right now, so does one of
the trees get rebased after the merge of the other but before being pulled
by Linus, or does Linus do this merge fixup when he pulls?

Thanks for cluing me in!

-- 
nvpublic

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-10-04  0:08 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-10-04 15:48 ` Stephen Warren
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-10-04  0:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Stephen Warren, Russell King, Olof Johansson

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-seaboard.h between commit ea5abbd215b7 ("ARM:
7101/1: arm/tegra: Replace <mach/gpio.h> with <mach/gpio-tegra.h>") from
the arm tree and commit a697e694aeb8 ("ARM: Tegra: Seaboard board updates
for audio") from the arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-seaboard.h
index 15b6c57,d06c334..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-seaboard.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-seaboard.h
@@@ -17,8 -17,9 +17,11 @@@
  #ifndef _MACH_TEGRA_BOARD_SEABOARD_H
  #define _MACH_TEGRA_BOARD_SEABOARD_H
  
 +#include <mach/gpio-tegra.h>
 +
+ #define SEABOARD_GPIO_TPS6586X(_x_)	(TEGRA_NR_GPIOS + (_x_))
+ #define SEABOARD_GPIO_WM8903(_x_)	(SEABOARD_GPIO_TPS6586X(4) + (_x_))
+ 
  #define TEGRA_GPIO_SD2_CD		TEGRA_GPIO_PI5
  #define TEGRA_GPIO_SD2_WP		TEGRA_GPIO_PH1
  #define TEGRA_GPIO_SD2_POWER		TEGRA_GPIO_PI6

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-10-04  0:05 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-10-04  0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Stephen Warren,
	Marc Dietrich, Olof Johansson

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.h between commit ea5abbd215b7 ("ARM:
7101/1: arm/tegra: Replace <mach/gpio.h> with <mach/gpio-tegra.h>") from
the arm tree and commit 9aaa15a739a0 ("ARM: tegra: paz00: enable rfkill
for internal wifi card") from the arm-soc tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.h
index 42ce863,86057c3..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-paz00.h
@@@ -17,12 -17,18 +17,20 @@@
  #ifndef _MACH_TEGRA_BOARD_PAZ00_H
  #define _MACH_TEGRA_BOARD_PAZ00_H
  
 +#include <mach/gpio-tegra.h>
 +
- #define TEGRA_GPIO_SD1_CD		TEGRA_GPIO_PV5
- #define TEGRA_GPIO_SD1_WP		TEGRA_GPIO_PH1
- #define TEGRA_GPIO_SD1_POWER		TEGRA_GPIO_PT3
- #define TEGRA_ULPI_RST			TEGRA_GPIO_PV0
+ /* SDCARD */
+ #define TEGRA_GPIO_SD1_CD	TEGRA_GPIO_PV5
+ #define TEGRA_GPIO_SD1_WP	TEGRA_GPIO_PH1
+ #define TEGRA_GPIO_SD1_POWER	TEGRA_GPIO_PT3
+ 
+ /* ULPI */
+ #define TEGRA_ULPI_RST		TEGRA_GPIO_PV0
+ 
+ /* WIFI */
+ #define TEGRA_WIFI_PWRN		TEGRA_GPIO_PK5
+ #define TEGRA_WIFI_RST		TEGRA_GPIO_PD1
+ #define TEGRA_WIFI_LED		TEGRA_GPIO_PD0
  
  void paz00_pinmux_init(void);
  

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-09-27 15:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2011-09-27 21:23     ` Russell King
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2011-09-27 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas,
	Jon Medhurst

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Do you generally send one pull request for each branch you have
> in the for-next branch, or do you send a single request for something
> that roughly resembles the for-next branch at the time of the merge
> window?

It depends how much is queued and how I feel towards the stuff which
is queued.  I've tended to send initially a big pull request of 'ARM
updates' which contains mostly everything, though I've also sent
pull requests for individual topic branches when it makes more sense.

At the moment, the diffstat summary says:

 423 files changed, 3054 insertions(+), 2855 deletions(-)

but there's quite a spread outside arch/arm this time around due to
the GPIO stuff I'm carrying (mostly the change of mach/gpio.h to
asm/gpio.h).

So, at least the GPIO stuff will be a completely separate pull request
from the rest of the ARM stuff.  The 'amba' (primecell) changes will
probably also be a separate pull request because it touches stuff
outside of the arch/arm sub-tree (even though its ARM related.)

What I term 'devel-stable' (iow, stuff I've pulled in from other people
and a few bits of my own stuff which others are using) won't be split
up (that'd negate the point of devel-stable being... stable as it'd
mean there's commits in there which can't be relied upon.)

That leaves 'the rest' which I'll make a decision nearer the time,
along with deciding whether devel-stable ends up being part of
'the rest' or not.

What I will try to do is get the bulk of it in fairly early in the
merge cycle as normal.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-09-27  7:25 ` Russell King
@ 2011-09-27 15:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
  2011-09-27 21:23     ` Russell King
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-09-27 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas,
	Jon Medhurst

On Tuesday 27 September 2011, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:25:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> > 
> > [I have a feeling that I may have reported this previously]
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> > arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c between commit e73fc88e19d7 ("ARM: 7059/1:
> > LPAE: Use PMD_(SHIFT|SIZE|MASK) instead of PGDIR_*") from the arm tree
> > and commit 99d1717dd7fe ("ARM: Add init_consistent_dma_size()") from the
> > arm-soc tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Ok, looks good.

> This has happened because I've dropped a large chunk of my tree from the
> for-next branch due to some horrible conflicts and some bad workflow
> practice in a git tree I recently merged (so this merge which I'd
> normally do has been exposed.)

Since we have a few conflicts already, I think I'll wait for your
tree to go in first and then send my pull requests with the proper
fixups. I could already pull in some branches that I know I will
have to wait for.

Do you generally send one pull request for each branch you have
in the for-next branch, or do you send a single request for something
that roughly resembles the for-next branch at the time of the merge
window?

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-09-27  1:25 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-09-27  6:20 ` Tixy
@ 2011-09-27  7:25 ` Russell King
  2011-09-27 15:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2011-09-27  7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Jon Medhurst

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:25:24AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> [I have a feeling that I may have reported this previously]
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c between commit e73fc88e19d7 ("ARM: 7059/1:
> LPAE: Use PMD_(SHIFT|SIZE|MASK) instead of PGDIR_*") from the arm tree
> and commit 99d1717dd7fe ("ARM: Add init_consistent_dma_size()") from the
> arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

This has happened because I've dropped a large chunk of my tree from the
for-next branch due to some horrible conflicts and some bad workflow
practice in a git tree I recently merged (so this merge which I'd
normally do has been exposed.)

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-09-27  1:25 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-09-27  6:20 ` Tixy
  2011-09-27  7:25 ` Russell King
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Tixy @ 2011-09-27  6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Russell King

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 11:25 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> [I have a feeling that I may have reported this previously]
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c between commit e73fc88e19d7 ("ARM: 7059/1:
> LPAE: Use PMD_(SHIFT|SIZE|MASK) instead of PGDIR_*") from the arm tree
> and commit 99d1717dd7fe ("ARM: Add init_consistent_dma_size()") from
> the
> arm-soc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

The fixup looks correct to me.

-- 
Jon Medhurst (usually known as Tixy)

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 235eb77,50be842..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@@ -117,14 -119,10 +119,9 @@@ static void __dma_free_buffer(struct pa
>   }
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> - /* Sanity check size */
> - #if (CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE % SZ_2M)
> - #error "CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE must be multiple of 2MiB"
> - #endif
>   
> - #define CONSISTENT_OFFSET(x)  (((unsigned long)(x) - CONSISTENT_BASE) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> - #define CONSISTENT_PTE_INDEX(x) (((unsigned long)(x) - CONSISTENT_BASE) >> PMD_SHIFT)
> - #define NUM_CONSISTENT_PTES (CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE >> PMD_SHIFT)
>  -
> + #define CONSISTENT_OFFSET(x)  (((unsigned long)(x) - consistent_base) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
>  -#define CONSISTENT_PTE_INDEX(x) (((unsigned long)(x) - consistent_base) >> PGDIR_SHIFT)
> ++#define CONSISTENT_PTE_INDEX(x) (((unsigned long)(x) - consistent_base) >> PMD_SHIFT)
>   
>   /*
>    * These are the page tables (2MB each) covering uncached, DMA consistent allocations 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-09-27  1:25 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-09-27  6:20 ` Tixy
  2011-09-27  7:25 ` Russell King
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-27  1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Catalin Marinas, Russell King, Jon Medhurst

Hi Arnd,

[I have a feeling that I may have reported this previously]

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c between commit e73fc88e19d7 ("ARM: 7059/1:
LPAE: Use PMD_(SHIFT|SIZE|MASK) instead of PGDIR_*") from the arm tree
and commit 99d1717dd7fe ("ARM: Add init_consistent_dma_size()") from the
arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 235eb77,50be842..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@@ -117,14 -119,10 +119,9 @@@ static void __dma_free_buffer(struct pa
  }
  
  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
- /* Sanity check size */
- #if (CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE % SZ_2M)
- #error "CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE must be multiple of 2MiB"
- #endif
  
- #define CONSISTENT_OFFSET(x)	(((unsigned long)(x) - CONSISTENT_BASE) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
- #define CONSISTENT_PTE_INDEX(x) (((unsigned long)(x) - CONSISTENT_BASE) >> PMD_SHIFT)
- #define NUM_CONSISTENT_PTES (CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE >> PMD_SHIFT)
 -
+ #define CONSISTENT_OFFSET(x)	(((unsigned long)(x) - consistent_base) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
 -#define CONSISTENT_PTE_INDEX(x) (((unsigned long)(x) - consistent_base) >> PGDIR_SHIFT)
++#define CONSISTENT_PTE_INDEX(x) (((unsigned long)(x) - consistent_base) >> PMD_SHIFT)
  
  /*
   * These are the page tables (2MB each) covering uncached, DMA consistent allocations

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-09-22  1:49 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-09-22  2:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pitre @ 2011-09-22  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Sascha Hauer, Russell King

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-nuc93x/Makefile.boot between commit 86783a0c544d ("ARM:
> 7022/1: allow to detect conflicting zreladdrs") from the arm tree and
> commit 6adc1e7ff19d ("ARM: mach-nuc93x: delete") from the arm-soc tree.
> 
> The latter removes the file that the former updates, so i did that.

That is correct.


Nicolas

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-09-22  1:49 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-09-22  2:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-22  1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Sascha Hauer, Nicolas Pitre, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 469 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-nuc93x/Makefile.boot between commit 86783a0c544d ("ARM:
7022/1: allow to detect conflicting zreladdrs") from the arm tree and
commit 6adc1e7ff19d ("ARM: mach-nuc93x: delete") from the arm-soc tree.

The latter removes the file that the former updates, so i did that.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-09-13  1:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-09-14 22:58     ` David Brown
  2011-11-03  2:09     ` Stephen Rothwell
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: David Brown @ 2011-09-14 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Stephen Boyd, linux-next, linux-kernel,
	David Brown, Russell King

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:55:33AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:18:53 -0700 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > The device tree machine description also needs to have the .fixup and
> > .reserve callbacks added to it so that the device tree machines boot
> > properly. Perhaps the soc tree needs to pull in Russell's tree at some
> > point to resolve this subtle logical conflict or when the trees are
> > merged together someone will need to do an evil merge and add the
> > callbacks in the merge commit.
> 
> Ah, right.  I have added this merge fixup for today and can carry it as
> necessary.

Arnd, how do you want to handle this?  It's a simple patch, but only
applies to the merge of Russell's tree and the soc tree.

Thanks,
David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-09-12  2:18 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2011-09-13  1:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
  2011-09-14 22:58     ` David Brown
  2011-11-03  2:09     ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-13  1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Boyd
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, David Brown, Russell King

Hi Stephen,

On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:18:53 -0700 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> The device tree machine description also needs to have the .fixup and
> .reserve callbacks added to it so that the device tree machines boot
> properly. Perhaps the soc tree needs to pull in Russell's tree at some
> point to resolve this subtle logical conflict or when the trees are
> merged together someone will need to do an evil merge and add the
> callbacks in the merge commit.

Ah, right.  I have added this merge fixup for today and can carry it as
necessary.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:51:48 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] arm-soc: merge fixup for fixup/reserve being added to
 MACHINE descriptions

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
index 328df27..4ad2afb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ MACHINE_END
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 /* TODO: General device tree support for all MSM. */
 DT_MACHINE_START(MSM_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
+	.fixup = msm8x60_fixup,
+	.reserve = msm8x60_reserve,
 	.map_io = msm8x60_map_io,
 	.init_irq = msm8x60_init_irq,
 	.init_machine = msm8x60_dt_init,
-- 
1.7.5.4

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-09-12  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-09-12  2:18 ` Stephen Boyd
  2011-09-13  1:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2011-09-12  2:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linux-next, linux-kernel, David Brown, Russell King

On 09/11/11 19:05, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c between commit 9e775ad19f52 ("ARM:
> 7012/1: Set proper TEXT_OFFSET for newer MSMs") from the arm tree and
> commit 56e2d8a68803 ("ARM: msm: Add devicetree support for msm8660-surf")
> from the arm-soc tree.
>
> Just overlapping additions.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the
> fix as necessary.

The device tree machine description also needs to have the .fixup and
.reserve callbacks added to it so that the device tree machines boot
properly. Perhaps the soc tree needs to pull in Russell's tree at some
point to resolve this subtle logical conflict or when the trees are
merged together someone will need to do an evil merge and add the
callbacks in the merge commit.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-09-12  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-12  2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Nico Erfurth,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, Nicolas Ferre

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 498 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-at91/board-usb-a9260.c between commit 2f8163baada3 ("ARM:
gpio: convert includes of mach/gpio.h and asm/gpio.h to linux/gpio.h")
from the arm tree and commit 6939fd49787e ("at91: merge board USB-A9260
and USB-A9263 together") from the arm-soc tree.

The latter removes this file, so I did that.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-09-12  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-12  2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/gpio.h between commits 22fe67837614 ("ARM:
gpio: consolidate trivial gpiolib implementations") and 8f3c4537bb08
("ARM: gpio: make trivial GPIOLIB implementation the default") from the
arm tree and commits df1bac2e2f18 ("arm/mxc: use gpiolib helper for
gpio_to_irq"), a4395612290c ("gpio/mxc: move irq_to_gpio() into gpio-mxc
driver") and 1dfa86bb9d3f ("arm/mxc: move IMX_GPIO_NR into
mach/hardware.h")  from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (which leaves this file essentially empty - see below) anc
can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/gpio.h
index 3e1ffc8,44af006..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/gpio.h
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/gpio.h
@@@ -21,13 -21,12 +21,5 @@@
  
  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
  #include <mach/hardware.h>
 -#include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
 -
 -/* use gpiolib dispatchers */
 -#define gpio_get_value		__gpio_get_value
 -#define gpio_set_value		__gpio_set_value
 -#define gpio_cansleep		__gpio_cansleep
 -#define gpio_to_irq		__gpio_to_irq
  
- 
- /* There's a off-by-one betweem the gpio bank number and the gpiochip */
- /* range e.g. GPIO_1_5 is gpio 5 under linux */
- #define IMX_GPIO_NR(bank, nr)		(((bank) - 1) * 32 + (nr))
- 
- #define gpio_to_irq(gpio)	(MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START + (gpio))
- #define irq_to_gpio(irq)	((irq) - MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START)
- 
  #endif

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-09-12  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-12  2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King, Shawn Guo, Sascha Hauer

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/gpio.h between commit 22fe67837614 ("ARM:
gpio: consolidate trivial gpiolib implementations") and later ones from
the arm tree and commit 7e6c53aac38e ("gpio/mxs: move irq_to_gpio() into
gpio-mxs driver") and a579cebd76d8 ("arm/mxs: move MXS_GPIO_NR into
mach/mxs.h") from the arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (which leaves this file essentailly empty - see below) and
can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/gpio.h
index bb11e63,56025aa..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/gpio.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/include/mach/gpio.h
@@@ -20,8 -20,12 +20,4 @@@
  #ifndef __MACH_MXS_GPIO_H__
  #define __MACH_MXS_GPIO_H__
  
- #define MXS_GPIO_NR(bank, nr)	((bank) * 32 + (nr))
- 
- #define irq_to_gpio(irq)	((irq) - MXS_GPIO_IRQ_START)
- 
 -#include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
 -
 -/* use gpiolib dispatchers */
 -#define gpio_get_value		__gpio_get_value
 -#define gpio_set_value		__gpio_set_value
 -#define gpio_cansleep		__gpio_cansleep
 -#define gpio_to_irq		__gpio_to_irq
 -
  #endif /* __MACH_MXS_GPIO_H__ */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-09-12  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-09-12  2:18 ` Stephen Boyd
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-09-12  2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, David Brown, Stephen Boyd, Russell King

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c between commit 9e775ad19f52 ("ARM:
7012/1: Set proper TEXT_OFFSET for newer MSMs") from the arm tree and
commit 56e2d8a68803 ("ARM: msm: Add devicetree support for msm8660-surf")
from the arm-soc tree.

Just overlapping additions.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the
fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
index 9221f54,10fa8f6..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8x60.c
@@@ -20,7 -14,10 +14,11 @@@
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
  #include <linux/io.h>
  #include <linux/irq.h>
 +#include <linux/memblock.h>
+ #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+ #include <linux/of.h>
+ #include <linux/of_address.h>
+ #include <linux/of_platform.h>
  
  #include <asm/mach-types.h>
  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@@ -81,9 -62,42 +79,44 @@@ static void __init msm8x60_init(void
  {
  }
  
+ #ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ static struct of_dev_auxdata msm_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
+ 	{}
+ };
+ 
+ static struct of_device_id msm_dt_gic_match[] __initdata = {
+ 	{ .compatible = "qcom,msm-8660-qgic", },
+ 	{}
+ };
+ 
+ static void __init msm8x60_dt_init(void)
+ {
+ 	struct device_node *node;
+ 
+ 	node = of_find_matching_node_by_address(NULL, msm_dt_gic_match,
+ 			MSM8X60_QGIC_DIST_PHYS);
+ 	if (node)
+ 		irq_domain_add_simple(node, GIC_SPI_START);
+ 
+ 	if (of_machine_is_compatible("qcom,msm8660-surf")) {
+ 		printk(KERN_INFO "Init surf UART registers\n");
+ 		msm8x60_init_uart12dm();
+ 	}
+ 
+ 	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table,
+ 			msm_auxdata_lookup, NULL);
+ }
+ 
+ static const char *msm8x60_fluid_match[] __initdata = {
+ 	"qcom,msm8660-fluid",
+ 	"qcom,msm8660-surf",
+ 	NULL
+ };
+ #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
+ 
  MACHINE_START(MSM8X60_RUMI3, "QCT MSM8X60 RUMI3")
 +	.fixup = msm8x60_fixup,
 +	.reserve = msm8x60_reserve,
  	.map_io = msm8x60_map_io,
  	.init_irq = msm8x60_init_irq,
  	.init_machine = msm8x60_init,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-08-29  1:04 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-08-29  9:17 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2011-08-29  9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-next, linux-kernel, Sascha Hauer, Russell King

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Arnd,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-u300/Makefile.boot between commit 74b84ad6c1a5 ("ARM:
> 7022/1: allow to detect conflicting zreladdrs") from the arm tree and
> commit 732851465445 ("mach-u300: retire odd singlemem variant") from the
> arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.

Looks correct, and it's one of the unavoidable things as we clean up
the ARM tree, thanks a lot Stephen!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-08-29  1:04 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-08-29  9:17 ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-08-29  1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Sascha Hauer, Russell King, Linus Walleij

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-u300/Makefile.boot between commit 74b84ad6c1a5 ("ARM:
7022/1: allow to detect conflicting zreladdrs") from the arm tree and
commit 732851465445 ("mach-u300: retire odd singlemem variant") from the
arm-soc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc arch/arm/mach-u300/Makefile.boot
index 69357af,a06bb0d..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-u300/Makefile.boot
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-u300/Makefile.boot
@@@ -1,15 -1,4 +1,4 @@@
- # Note: the following conditions must always be true:
- #   ZRELADDR == virt_to_phys(TEXTADDR)
- #   PARAMS_PHYS must be within 4MB of ZRELADDR
- #   INITRD_PHYS must be in RAM
- 
- ifdef CONFIG_MACH_U300_SINGLE_RAM
-      zreladdr-y	+= 0x28E08000
-   params_phys-y	:= 0x28E00100
- else
-      zreladdr-y	+= 0x48008000
-   params_phys-y	:= 0x48000100
- endif
- 
 -   zreladdr-y	:= 0x48008000
++   zreladdr-y	+= 0x48008000
+ params_phys-y	:= 0x48000100
  # This isn't used.
- #initrd_phys-y	:= 0x29800000
+ #initrd_phys-y	:= 0x48800000

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  2011-07-16  5:07 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-07-17 21:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 122+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2011-07-17 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King

On Saturday 16 July 2011 07:07:41 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got conflicts in lots of
> files due to commit 7712eeac230b ("arm-soc: remove rmk/for-next merge")
> from the arm-soc tree (and maybe some others).
> 
> Arnd, is there some way that you can rebuild (rebase) your tree without
> the merge of Russell's tree and the consequent revert of that merge?  It
> is likely to revert a whole swath of changes from Russell's tree :-(
> 
> I have dropped the arm-soc tree for today.

I've done a new branch 'for-next' now to replace the 'master' branch, and
it does not contain the broken merge any more. Please change your list
of branches accordingly.

There are three other conflicts that I found when test-merging the arm-soc
tree with the current linux-next tree. I've already written about the
omap_dss2 mismerge, which is a huge mess and I've resolved that conflict
on my end for now. There is a simpler conflict with the gpio tree, which
I've also resolved in a similar way by adding a dependency here.

The third conflict in arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx27_3ds.c is much simpler, so
I assume you will do the obvious hand-merge.

Thanks,

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

* linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
@ 2011-07-16  5:07 Stephen Rothwell
  2011-07-17 21:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 122+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-07-16  5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Russell King

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 576 bytes --]

Hi Arnd,

Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got conflicts in lots of
files due to commit 7712eeac230b ("arm-soc: remove rmk/for-next merge")
from the arm-soc tree (and maybe some others).

Arnd, is there some way that you can rebuild (rebase) your tree without
the merge of Russell's tree and the consequent revert of that merge?  It
is likely to revert a whole swath of changes from Russell's tree :-(

I have dropped the arm-soc tree for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 122+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-28  0:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-05 23:20 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-02-28  0:16 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-01 22:01 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-14 22:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-20 19:45   ` Alain Volmat
2021-02-21  0:28     ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-21 22:03   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-29 23:27 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-30 12:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-05-29 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-23 12:25 Mark Brown
2017-01-17 22:49 Stephen Rothwell
2017-01-17 22:53 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-08-11 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-11 23:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-09-02  0:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-01 22:47 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-29 22:55 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-29 23:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-26  1:23 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-26  8:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-26  9:27   ` Daniel Thompson
2014-09-26 13:52     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-26  8:19 ` Carlo Caione
2014-09-26  8:39   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-25  0:13 Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-02  0:49 Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-02  3:28 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-27  0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-27  0:48 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-23  0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-23  0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-23 13:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-08-15  4:36 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-01  6:44 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-26 10:31 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-26 10:39 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-09-27  5:48 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-20  6:03 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-20  7:04 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-16  8:50 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-16  9:36 ` Haojian Zhuang
2012-05-14  8:39 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-03  5:35 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-16  6:49 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-16  8:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-15  7:06 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-15  7:06 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-15  6:56 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-13  8:47 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-13  8:42 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-13  8:36 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-29  5:16 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-09 23:50 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-10  0:25 ` Olof Johansson
2012-01-24  1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-06  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-07  4:44 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-07  6:53   ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-07  5:48 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-07  6:48   ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-06  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-06  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-06  8:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-06 10:31   ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-05  0:27 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-02 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-18 23:55 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-19  1:32 ` Shawn Guo
2011-12-18 23:55 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-06 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-07  2:59 ` Shawn Guo
2011-12-06 23:52 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-07  2:57 ` Shawn Guo
2011-11-27 23:56 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-28 19:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-29  8:06   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2011-12-07 19:28     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-11-24  0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-24 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-24 22:25   ` Shawn Guo
2011-11-25 17:08     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-10-24 20:52 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-24 20:45 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-24 20:51 ` Russell King
2011-10-25  8:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-10-25 12:12 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-10-24 20:39 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-24 20:48 ` Russell King
2011-10-24 21:08   ` Rob Herring
2011-10-24 20:20 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-24 20:30 ` Russell King
2011-10-24 21:09   ` Sascha Hauer
2011-10-24 21:16     ` Russell King
2011-10-13  0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-13  0:11 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-13  0:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-04  0:08 Stephen Rothwell
2011-10-04 15:48 ` Stephen Warren
2011-10-04 19:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-10-04  0:05 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27  1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27  6:20 ` Tixy
2011-09-27  7:25 ` Russell King
2011-09-27 15:24   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-27 21:23     ` Russell King
2011-09-22  1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-22  2:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-12  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-12  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-12  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-12  2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-12  2:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-09-13  1:55   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-14 22:58     ` David Brown
2011-11-03  2:09     ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-03  2:22       ` David Brown
2011-11-03 15:10         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-29  1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29  9:17 ` Linus Walleij
2011-07-16  5:07 Stephen Rothwell
2011-07-17 21:44 ` Arnd Bergmann

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).