From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:00:02 -0400 Message-ID: <20140314130002.GB12613@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20140312005152.9ac4063f65dbd233f5d50b4d@kernel.org> <20140312015021.GC10106@kroah.com> <1394596541.4840.70.camel@pasglop> <20140312113742.GM28112@sirena.org.uk> <1394654396.4840.94.camel@pasglop> <20140312200232.GA22332@htj.dyndns.org> <1394655292.4840.97.camel@pasglop> <20140312202102.GB22332@htj.dyndns.org> <1394671056.4840.103.camel@pasglop> <1394748895.15098.16.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]:46879 "EHLO mail-qa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754051AbaCNNAF (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:00:05 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1394748895.15098.16.camel@pasglop> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Mark Brown , Greg KH , Stewart Smith , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:14:55AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 11:37 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 16:21 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > It's a series of rather complex patches. I really don't think > > > duplicating them is a good idea. We can either resurrect the old API > > > to kill it again or set up a merge branch which I don't think is too > > > unusual in situations like this. > > > > Right, a topic branch that gets merged in both driver-core-next and > > powerpc-next. > > Just want to make sure we agree ... ie, the offending commit is already > in powerpc-next on my side and I can't really back it out (I could > revert it though). Hmmm... reverting may be an option too but I don't think fixing it retroactively in a new branch should be okay too. Thanks. -- tejun